Common Law Duties and Liability to Client's and Third Parties Flashcards
Under a common law negligence suit
CPA escapes liability by showing that the audit was conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
To prove common law fraud
a purchaser has to prove scienter/knowledge of the misstatements
CPA Defenses to common law negligence to avoid liability are
1) The CPA was not negligent or fraudulent.
2) Contributory negligence of the client caused the loss.
3) The CPA adhered to GAAS and planned audit examination to search for material fraud.
4) The error was immaterial.
5) The proximate cause of loss was not the erroneous financial statements
If financial reports are primarily for the benefit of a third party and the CPA is negligent in preparing the reports
The CPA may be held liable to Any foreseen or known third party who relied on the report
Lack of privity is a viable defense in most jurisdictions
if the plantiff is a creditor of the client. Privity is not needed in fraud or negligence
Audit workpapers
are not protected as privileged communication and may be subpoenaed
A CPA may be held liable to clients for
fraud, negligence, or breach of contract
In an Ultramares case
a third party who proves gross negligence will be able to prove that the CPA is guilty of fraud
To establish negligence against the CPA, a client must show that
1) CPA owed a legal duty,
2) CPA breached that duty,
3) CPA’s action was the proximate cause of the resulting injury to the client
4) CPA’s actions caused the damage or loss