Cognitive Psychology - Studies Flashcards

1
Q

What was the aim of Baddeley’s study in 1966?

A

To find out if long term memory encodes acoustically or semantically.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the type of experiment that Baddeley carried out?

A

It was a lab experiment designed to test the recall of acoustically and semantically similar words.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What type of design was Baddeley’s study?

A

Independent groups design.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In Baddeley’s study (1966), what were the 4 lists?

A

There were 4 lists comprising of acoustically similar, acoustically dissimilar, semantically similar and semantically dissimilar words and each list were made up of 10 words.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How were the participants of Baddeley’s study given the words?

A

Each list was presented aloud, on tape, and the participants were given a word every 3 seconds and were given 40 seconds to remember them. They then had to spend time doing a certain task that was unrelated.
They then had to recall the 10 words in the correct order.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were the results of Baddeley’s study?

A

The recall of acoustically similar sounding words was worse than the dissimilar words during the initial trials. However, the recall of the acoustically similar lists after 20 mins was better and there was no significant forgetting. This demonstrates that acoustic encoding was difficult but didn’t affect the long-term recall. There was a significant amount of forgetting on the lists of semantically similar and dissimilar.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the conclusion that Baddeley came to?

A

The list of acoustically similar words was the only list to show no forgetting in LTM. This suggests that encoding in LTM is acoustic rather than semantic which contradicts earlier studies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Generalisability of Baddeley’s study

A

Not generalisable as large sample was split into 4 groups.
Volunteer sample meant that more people with a good memory who would enjoy these tests might join in.
Sample was mostly students.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Reliability of Baddeley’s study

A

Standardised procedures that can be replicated - same word, same amount of time to memorise and recall.
Improved reliability for displaying the words for hard-of-hearing ppts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Applicability of Baddeley’s study

A

Use of interference task to test the STM has been influential in cognitive psychology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Validity of Baddeley’s study

A

High internal validity due to the degree of control - the recall of word order avoids potential confounding variables that would lower internal validity.

Low ecological validity due to artificial nature of study - tightly controlled; not realistic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ethics of Baddeley’s study

A

All ethics were read out to the participants so it was highly ethical. However it could be argued that the participants were deceived when they were asked to recall 15 minutes after the tests without being told they would have to do this.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the aim of Schmolck et al
(2002)’s study?

A

To investigate if there was a link between damage to the anterolateral temporal cortex of the brain and performance on tests of semantic memory in people with amnesia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the procedure of Schmolck et al
(2002)’s study?

A

Researchers studied 6 amnesiacs; 1 female, 5 males.
3 had large lesions to medial temporal lobe (MTL), 2 had damage to the hippocampus (HF) and HM had hippocampal and MTL damage.
Each ppt completed nine main tests of semantic memory, on 3 to 5 occasions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the results of Schmolck et al
(2002)’s study?

A

Pointing and naming tests: HF patients and control patients made almost no errors but MTL patients showed significant impairments.
HM performed closely on the same level as the control patients on 3 tests.

Yes/no tests: HF patients performed on the same level, MTL patients showed significant impairments.

Categorizing tests: Controls produced more examples (mean was 128.8) compared to HLT (112) and MTL patients (75.7)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What were the conclusions of Schmolck et al
(2002)’s study?

A

Overall HF patients performed better than the other participants. This study confirms previous studies of semantic dementia showing a link between impaired semantic memory and damage to the anterolateral temporal cortex.

17
Q

Generalisability of Schmolck et al
(2002)’s study?

A

Not generalisable; only used a small sample. HM suffered from epilepsy and MTL patients had STDs. Unsure about cognitive function of the patients before brain injury.

18
Q

Reliability of Schmolck et al
(2002)’s study?

A

Standardised procedures; can be replicated and Schmolck used 14 raters to check the participants’ scores.

19
Q

Application of Schmolck et al
(2002)’s study?

A

Helps us understand the brain’s function in memory and understand the risks of brain surgery and injury

20
Q

Validity of Schmolck et al
(2002)’s study?

A

Use of healthy controls and matched pairs design which increases validity.
(Not all participants were matched; MTL and control ppts were but not HM ppts)

Low ecological validity; artificial tasks.

21
Q

Ethics of Schmolck et al
(2002)’s study?

A

No informed/valid consent; they were amnesiac patients so had to obtain presumptive consent.

22
Q

What was the aim of Sebastian and Hernandez-Gil’s study (2012)?

A

To investigate the development of phonological loop in children between the ages of 5-17 years old.

23
Q

What was the procedure of Sebastian and Hernandez-Gil’s study?

A

575 children (volunteer participants) aged between 5-17 years old from various in Madrid.
Each participant was tested individually in the school break time using sequences of random digits that gradually increased by one in length each time.
They were read aloud to each participant.
The task began with three sequences of three digits and then increased by one digit each time (3 sequences of 4 digits and so on.)
The ppts listened to the sequences and were told to repeat them in order.
Digit span was defined as the longest sequence the child could recall, two times out of the three presented, in order and without error.

24
Q

Results of Sebastian and Hernandez-Gil’s study?

A

The results clearly showed that the digit span increased with age.
The pre-school children had a very low digit span that rises up until the age of 11, where it shows. The rate of increase slowed and stabilised up to 17 years old.

25
Q

Conclusion of Sebastian and Hernandez-Gil’s study?

A

Digit span increases with age from 5-17 years old. Comparing these findings with research from Alzheimer’s patients, it is possible to speculate that from this research that poor digit span is a result of aging rather than dementia or deteriorating brain function.

26
Q

Generalisability of Sebastian and Hernandez-Gil’s study?

A

575 ppts were used; more representative, larger sample.

Only Spanish students used, cannot be generalized to whole population.

27
Q

Reliability of Sebastian and Hernandez-Gil’s study?

A

Standardised procedure; same digit span given to all children and was conducted in a lab so no external variables.

28
Q

Application of Sebastian and Hernandez-Gil’s study?

A

Can be applied and used by schools in order to work out whether or not a child has a verbal impairment and provide the right help for them.

29
Q

Validity of Sebastian and Hernandez-Gil’s study?

A

Ecologically valid; involved children in their classes where they would usually sit tests.

Lacks internal validity as other factors, like word length, affected the results

30
Q

Ethical issues of Sebastian and Hernandez-Gil’s study?

A

No ethical issues.