Cognitive: Moray on Auditory Attention Flashcards

core study

1
Q

key theme for moray

A

attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

context: what are the 2 main methods of studying attention

A

selective attention
divided attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

context: selective attention

A

presented with 2 or more ‘simultaneous’ messages, and instructed to process and respond to only one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

context: divided attention

A

dual-task technique where expected to respond to both or all messages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

context: Cherry’s study 1953

A

‘shadowing’ method showed that ptcpts had no recall of message contents from the ‘rejected’ ear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

context: shadowing

A

playing 2 messages to someone at the same time, one to each ear.
listener has to pay attention to one message and repeat it out loud, to ensure it has been heard.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

1st experiment aim

A

to test Cherry’s original results more rigorously

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

2nd experiment aim

A

to see if some kinds of messages break through the attentional block to the rejected ear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

3rd experiment aim

A

to see if expectations set may affect the way the message to the rejected ear is processed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

1st experiment: design and method

A

laboratory
repeated measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

1st experiment: IV

A

the message played to shadowed and rejected ears

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

1st experiment: DV

A

recall of words in rejected message

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

1st experiment: control

A

list of words not included in either message

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

1st experiment: sample

A

male and female undergraduates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

1st experiment: procedure (5 steps)

A
  1. Before each experiment, ptcpts given 4 passages to shadow for practice
  2. A short list of simple words presented to ptcpts rejected ear 35 times, whilst a passage of prose presented to shadowed ear and ptcpts had to verbally repeat shadowed message
  3. ptcpt then given a recognition test where they were shown a list of words and had to pick out the words that they recognised from both the shadowed and rejected ears. Test included some words from control list to ensure ptcpts weren’t making wild guesses about the words they heard.
    5.The gap between the end of shadowing and the beginning of the recognition test was about 30 seconds.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

1st experiment: results

A

ptcpts recalled less words from rejected message than from shadowed

17
Q

2nd experiment: design and method

A

laboratory
repeated measures

18
Q

2nd experiment: sample

A

male and female undergraduates
12 ptcpts

19
Q

2nd experiment: procedure (3 steps)

A
  1. Ptcpts shadowed 10 prose passages in one ear, and had one passage playing to rejected ear, simultaneously.
  2. The rejected message included instructions for the ptcpt to change ears as well as occasionally including their name. Instructions were inserted randomly “Listen to your right ear: You will receive instructions to change ears.”
  3. Ptcpts attention measured by how successfully they heard the instruction and shadowing message in the ear that they were instructed to change to.
20
Q

2nd experiment: results

A
  1. When ptcpts heard their name in the instruction, they were able to hear and follow the instructions 20 out of 39 times.
  2. When participants had instructions with no name, they were able to hear and follow the instructions only 4 times.
21
Q

3rd experiment: method and design

A

laboratory
independent measures

22
Q

3rd experiment: IV 1

A

whether digits inserted into 1 or 2 messages

23
Q

3rd experiment: IV 2

A

whether ptcpts told would be asked questions about just rejected message or remember all digits heard

24
Q

3rd experiment: DV

A

number of digits correctly recalled

25
Q

3rd experiment: sample

A

male and female undergraduates
28 ptcpts

26
Q

3rd experiment: procedure (3 steps)

A
  1. Two groups of 14 ptcpts shadowed one of two simultaneous messages, just like in the first 2 experiments.
  2. Digits were inserted to each passage in a random way
    3.One group of ptcpts was provided no instruction and told that they would be asked questions about the content of the rejected message at the end, the other group was specifically instructed to remember all the numbers/ digits that they could.
27
Q

3rd experiment: results

A

results showed no difference in the mean number of digits recalled correctly between the two set conditions
(This was concluded to be due to the fact that numbers are less important than a persons own name, therefore not strong enough to break though the block.)