Cognitive explanations: Kohlberg's theory Flashcards

1
Q

What is Kohlbergs theory based on?

A

The idea that a childs understanding of gender becomes more sophisticated with age - biological maturation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How many stages are there to gender development in his theory?

A

3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are those stages called?

A

Stage 1: Gender identity
Stage 2: Gender stability
Stage 3: Gender constancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the ages for stage 1?

A

2 - 3 years old

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the first stage - gender identity?

A

children can correctly identify themselves as a boy or girl at around 2 years of age
- at 3 years, most children can identify other people as boys/men and women/girls
- gender isn’t fixed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the ages for stage 2?

A

4 years old

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is stage 2 - gender stability?

A

Realization that they’ll stay the same gender
- Cannot apply the same logic to others
- Often confused by external changes in appearance
- EG: man with long hair = woman
- Believe that people change genders if they engage in activities associated with the opposite gender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the age for stage 3?

A

6 years old

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is stage 3 - gender constancy?

A
  • recognize that gender stays constant across time and situations
  • Applied to other peoples gender too
  • No longer fooled by outward changes to appearance
  • Begin to seek out gender appropriate role models
  • Once the concept has been fully developed and internalized, seek evidence that confirms it
  • A tendency towards gender stereotyping begins to emerge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are strengths of this theory?

A
  • Evidence suggests gender stereotyping does occur around the age of 6
  • Kohlbergs stage are influenced by changes in the developing brain and increased intellectual capacity that comes with age
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What evidence supports stage 3?

A

Damon told children a story of George
- George liked to play with dolls
- Children were asked to comment on the story
- 4 year olds said it was fine for him to play with dolls
- 6 year olds thought it was wrong
- Had gone beyond understanding what boys and girls do, to developing rules that they should obey
- Suggests children who have reached constancy have formed rigid stereotypes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why is ‘Kohlbergs stage are influenced by changes in the developing brain and increased intellectual capacity that comes with age’ a strength?

A
  • A ‘nature’ approach
  • Supported by cross cultural research (munroe et al)
  • Suggested that the cognitive changes described may be universal
  • Means they may be biological
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are limitations to the theory?

A
  • Some research challenges the idea of gender constancy at age 6
  • Supporting research relies on unsatisfactory methods to assess gender constancy
  • Other researchers suggest different degrees of gender constancy
  • Kohlberg fails to properly account for the socialization process in the development of gender early on
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How is ‘- Some research challenges the idea that an interest in gender appropriate behavior only develops around age 6’ a limitation?

A

Bussey and Bandura found that children as young as 4 ‘feel good’ about playing with gender appropriate toys
- They ‘feel bad’ about doing the opposite
- Suggests children are able to absorb gender appropriate info as soon as they identify themselves as either male or female

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How is ‘Supporting research relies on unsatisfactory methods to assess gender constancy’ a limitation?

A

Bem criticised the methodology in many studies trying to link gender and cognitive development
- Key test of gender constancy is whether a child understands that gender stays the same despite changes in appearance and context
- Bem argued children are confused by this as this is how we separate one gender from another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Further explain Bem’s argument?

A
  • Identify men and women by their clothes and hair
  • Best way to identify genders through physical appearance (genitalia)
  • Something younger children dont understand
  • Bem shown that 40% of children aged 3-5 were able to demonstrate constancy if shown a naked photo of children
17
Q

What does Bem’s argument and findings suggest?

A

The typical way of testing constancy may misrepresent what younger children actually know

18
Q

How is ‘Other researchers suggest different degrees of gender constancy’ a limitation?

A

Martin et al praise Kohlberg’s theory for suggesting childrens understanding of their own and others genders guides their thoughts and behaviours
- Point out that when and how this affects childrens gender related behaviour is unclear
- May be different degree of gender constancy

19
Q

Further explain Martin et al’s argument

A

An initial degree may orient children to the importance of gender in choosing friends or seeking info
- May develop before the age 6
- A second degree of constancy may heighten children’s responsiveness to gender norms, esp under conditions of conflict
> like choosing appropriate clothes

20
Q

What does Martin et al’s argument suggest?

A

Acquiring constancy may be a more gradual process and may begin earlier than Kohlberg thought

21
Q

How is ‘Kohlberg fails to properly account for the socialization process in the development of gender early on’ a limitation?

A

Bussey and Bandura claim that social processes of observation, imitation and identification plays a more important role than cognitive structures