Cognitive Development Flashcards

1
Q

Assimilation

A

adding new information to one’s cognitive structure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Accommodation

A

modifying existing structures or replacing old structures with new structures (if new way of seeing the world are in conflict with existing structures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Equilibrium

A

a balance between assimilation and accommodation that facilitates interaction within a particular environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Disequilibrium

A

cognitive dissonance or anxiety occurring from conflicts between current cognitive structures and experiences – stimulates development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Transition

A

where cognitive development occurs (between positions and stages); prompted by dissonance or disequilibrium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

a/Authorities

A

those assumed to have access to “truth” and the “right” answers (people and books) absolute truths vs. expertise – capital A can’t be questioned authorities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Self-Authorship

A

the internal capacity to make meaning of one’s beliefs, knowledge, identity, and relationships to others → bringing one’s internal sense of self to the foreground and moving external influences to the background

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Critical Thinking

A

the ability to define one’s own beliefs int eh context of existing knowledge. In college: exploring multiple perspectives, respecting diverse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Reflective Judgment

A

a process reflecting one’s capacity to engage in increasingly complex problem-solving and judgment-making in uncertain situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Perry’s Intellectual Scheme

A

9 positions, not stages → categorized into 4 categories – elementary to more advanced- simple to contextual sense making- understanding what makes sense in one context doesn’t work in another context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dualism (position 1) Perry’s Intellectual Scheme

A

tendency to view the world dichotomously and knowledge as absolute – “good or bad” “right and wrong” “black or white” “either/or”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Multiplicity (position 2-4) Perry’s Intellectual Scheme

A

honoring diverse views when the “right” answers are unknown- take ownership for constructing knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Relativism (position 5) Perry’s Intellectual Scheme

A

accepting multiple perspectives while recognizing that all options are not equally valid. Knowledge is contextual and based on evidence and supporting arguments. Difference from multiplicity – assumes that there is a right answer when it is unknown- whereas all knowledge is contextual and there are no right/wrongs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Commitment (position 6-9) Perry’s Intellectual Scheme

A

affirming one’s values, choices, priorities, and decisions in a relativistic world. A shift from cognitive to ethical development.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The Developmental Instruction Model (DIM)

A

one way of designing student learning experiences - model developed by PERRY

•	Structure- the amount of scaffolding and direction provided to students. 
o	Detailed instructions and examples reflecting student’s experiences
o	Viewed as important at earlier stages
•	Diversity- exposure to multiple perspectives through readings, class assignments, speakers, ect.  
•	Experiential learning- opportunities to apply and test knowledge, and to learn vicariously by observing more competent models and interacting with peers
•	Personalism- having access to safe learning environments and instructors who are accessible, approachable, and provide helpful feedback
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Baxter Magolda’s Theory of Self-Authorship

A

Miami (Ohio) Students

3 central questions- white, women, advanced degrees, moms
• How do I know? (epistemological)
• Who am I? (intrapersonal)
• How do I want to construct relationships with others? (interpersonal)

College environments are not conducive to facilitating self-authorship because…
• Acquisition of knowledge > understanding how knowledge is constructed
• Choosing a major > exploring interests in determining skills and talents
• Political correctness > understanding one’s sense of self in relation to and with

17
Q

Phase 1: Following Formulas, Self-Authorship

A

following the plans that are laid out by external authorities (parents, significant others, mentors, ect.)

18
Q

Phase 2: Crossroads, Self-Authorship

A

recognition that plans laid out by authorities are not personally rewarding or self-fulfilling – dissatisfaction – paritularly with careers and relationships

19
Q

Phase 3: Becoming the Author of One’s Life

A
  • assuming ownership of one’s own beliefs, following them, and staying true to them in the face of conflict, opposition, and disapproval – seem themselves as a work in progress
20
Q

Phase 4: Internal Foundation

A

being firmly grounded in one’s self-determined belief system. Life decisions are guided by this system. Primary source of information and decision making- decisions are guided by core values- one can successfully integrate their internal values with the external pressures that will always be present

21
Q

Learning Partnerships Model

Baxter Magolda I think…

A

Key Assumptions
1. knowledge is complex and socially constructed
a. co-constructors of knowledge- teacher has to get in their on their level- validate the student as a learner and as someone capable of constructing knowledge
2. the self is central to knowledge construction
3. authority and expertise are share in the mutual construction of knowledge
Core principles: “Educational practice must…
… validate the learner’s capacity to know”
…situate learning in the learner’s experience”
…mutually construct meaning.”