cognitive development Flashcards

paper 3

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

define cognitive development

A

process which human beings acquire, organise and use knowledge
explores the ability to think and reason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define a schema

A

web of information collected to help you navigate new experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what was Piaget’s ideas with schemas?

A

thought children were born with a small number of schemas (me-schema)
cognitive development found to be the development of complex schemas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

outline Piaget’s theory of the role of schema within motivation to learn

A

a new experience is encountered, if it appears similar to something a child already has a schema for (e.g. schema of a cat but seeing a dog for the first time) the child will assimilate and add to their existing schema
if someone corrects them or explains what the new experience is (e.g. an adult correcting a child that the animal they see is a dog), the child will go through disequilibrium and will have to equilibrate and adapt their understanding to create a new schema for this experience through accommodation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

define disequilibrium

A

an uncomfortable feeling being put in a position of unknowing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

define equilibration

A

adapting by exploring understanding of schema

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

define assimilation

A

adding new info to an existing schema

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

define accommodation

A

making a new schema to process the new information gained

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

evaluate Piaget’s theory of the role of schema in motivation to learn

A

A: Howe studied children by making them watch and discuss movements of objects falling down a slope- had increased understanding of what happened but all came to different conclusions -> supports idea
C: Lazonder + Harmsen reviewed popular learning styles inspired by Piaget (discover learning) + found no firm evidence that learning styles were effective without input from others -> lacked validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are Piaget’s 4 stages of cognitive development

A

sensorimotor, pre-operational, concrete operational, formal operational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

define Piaget’s sensorimotor stage in his theory of cognitive development

A

focus on physical sensations and babies not being able to see outside of object permanence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

define object permanence

A

understanding object continues outside of visual field

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

define Piaget’s pre-operational stage in his theory of cognitive development

A

demonstrating errors in reasoning regarding conservation, egocentrism and class inclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

define conservation

A

quantity remaining constant despite change in appearance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

define egocentrism

A

only seeing word from own point of view

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

define class inclusion

A

understanding categories but not subsections

17
Q

define Piaget’s concrete operational stage in his theory of cognitive development

A

performing better on tasks relating to conservation, egocentrism and class inclusion but bearer at looking into concrete situations (e.g. things they can physically see and interact with)

18
Q

define Piaget’s formal operational stage in his theory of cognitive development

A

capable of formal reasoning (focus on form of argument and not content)

19
Q

evaluate Piaget’s theory of the stages of cognitive development

A

C: 72% accuracy in conservation task during pre-operational ages (McGarrigle + Donaldson)
understood class inclusion when given feedback on choices made during study overtime (Siegler + Svetina)
90% accuracy in egocentrism task with 4yr olds when asked to move doll where the ‘police’ doll couldn’t see it
-> finding don’t align with Piaget’s theory as he says children should not be able to comprehend this at the stages- suggests maybe explaining the situation to the child in a better way produces a better outcome

20
Q

outline Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development

A
  • social mediated process- development happens with help of others
  • children aquire knowledge through collaborative dialogues with MKO (more knowledgable other)
  • Vygotsky thinks learning proceeds development- if you are taught the knowledge earlier, you can develop earlier
21
Q

define scaffolding in Vygotsky’s theory

A

help that MKO gives to support child to cross ZPD (zone of proximal development)

22
Q

outline the zones of Vygotsky’s scaffolding theory

A

ZAD (zone of actual development)- can do alone once gained knowledge
ZPD (zone of proximal development) -can do with help from MKO
out of reach- can’t do at all

23
Q

outline Wood, Burner and Ross’ further research into Vygotsky’s scaffolding theory

A

levels of help and nature of prompt: |
level 5- demonstration \/
level 4- preperation
level 3- indication of materials
level 2- specific verbal instructions
level 1- general prompts

24
Q

evaluate Vygotsky’s theory into cognitive development

A

A: Roazzi + Bryant: gave 4-5 year olds task of estimating number of sweets in a box (one condition alone, other had MKO)- MKO condition had more help and therefore were more accurate
A: Conner + Cross: observed 45 children doing problem solving task with help of mothers- mothers used less direct help overtime by giving prompts and children gained good experience from it
C: Howe: studied children watching and discussing movements of objects down slope- increased understanding by all but made different conclusions with what happened -> disagrees with theory by needing a MKO to learn