Cognitive area - Moray and Loftus and Palmer Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Whats the background to Moray’s study

A

More wanted to test Colin cherry’s theory of the cocktail party effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the aim of Moray’s study

A

To test cherry’s findings of the cocktail party effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the cocktail party effect referred to in Moray’s study

A

If your deep in conversation you will still be able to respond when someone mentions your name

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Outline the sample of the 3 experiments in Moray’s study.

A
  • Did not provide sample size for experiment 1
  • 12 participants in experiment 2
  • 2 groups of 14 participants in experiment 3 (28)
  • Made up of uni students and research workers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the procedure for experiment 1 (Moray)?

A
  • Short list of words spoken 35 times as rejected message
  • At the end of shadowing, participant asked to recall anything from the rejected message
  • 30 seconds later participants given recognition test of 21 words - 7 from shadowed passage, 7 from rejected and 7 random
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were the findings from experiment 1(Moray)?

A
  • 7 words taken from shadowed passage - average of 4.9/7
  • 7 words taken from rejected message - average of 1.9/7
  • 7 words similar but random - average 2.6/7
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the conclusions of experiment 1(Moray)?

A

When someone directs their attention to one thing, almost none of the ‘rejected’ message can be recalled.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a dichotic listening task(Moray)?

A

When two different auditory stimuli are presented into each ear through headphones.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the findings from experiment 2(Moray)?

A
  • When name was mentioned, participants heard instructions 20/39 times
  • When name was not mentioned, participants heard instructions 4/36 times
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the conclusions of experiment 2(Moray)?

A

That participants are more likely to hear something if something of relevance is said such as a name - breaks through ‘the block’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the procedure for experiment 2(Moray)?

A
  • 2 passages of light fiction in each ear - instructions at start to listen to right ear and make no mistakes
  • Participants name mentioned 3 times out of 10 passages - 36 affective cues (12 participants x 3)
  • Counted number of times participants heard the instructions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the procedure for experiment 3(Moray)?

A
  • Numbers put into the message towards the end -sometimes numbers were in both messages, sometimes in shadowed, sometimes in rejected
  • IV was the group - 1 group told at start they would be asked about shadowed message, 1 group told to remember as many numbers heard as possible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were the findings from experiment 3(Moray)?

A
  • Showed no significant difference between groups

- Concluded that this was because numbers are not important enough to break through the ‘block’, unlike a name

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How many participants in experiment one and two (Loftus and Palmer)?

A

Experiment one = 45

Experiment two = 150

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Where did the videos come from! (Loftus and Palmer)

A

Seattle police dept

Evergreen road safety council

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the general aim (Loftus and Palmer) ?

A

To test whether the phrasing of questions about a car accident could alter participants memory of an event

17
Q

What was the aim of experiment one? (Loftus and Palmer)

A

To see whether using different verbs to describe a collision between two cars would effect estimates of the speed at which they are travelling when the crash took place

18
Q

What was the experimental design (Loftus and Palmer) ? (1&2)

A

Independent measures design

19
Q

What was the process for Loftus and Palmers experiment 1 ?

A
  1. Shown 7 clips from Seattle road accident
  2. Asked how fast they where going as well as other questions
  3. Different words where used to describe the crash
20
Q

Identify all 5 conditions in Loftus and palmer experiment 1

A
Contact 
Hit 
Bumped 
Collided
Smashed
21
Q

What was the procedure for experiment 2 Loftus and Palmer

A
.Participants watched 1 min crash vid 
.2 groups asked critical question 
.one group used word smashed other hit 
.third group control group 
.week later asked if they saw glass
22
Q

What where the results for the broken glass question in Loftus and palmer experiment 2 ?

A

Smashed - 16/50 Yes
Hit -7/50 Yes
Control Group - 6/50 Yes