Cognitive Approach - Cognitive Processing - Models of Memory - Multi-Store Model Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Memory

A

A cognitive process that allows us to record, store and later retrieve experiences and information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Model

A

A physical representation of what a psychological phenomenon could look like (mostly based on a theory).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Multi-Store Model of Memory

A

By Atkinson & Shiffrin (1968)

Claims that information passes through different kinds of stores in order to become permanent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Multi-Store Model of Memory - Sensory Store

A

Information from the 5 senses

Duration < 1 sec

Capacity unlimited

Encoding modal specific

  • iconic
  • echoic
  • haptic
  • gustatory
  • smells
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Multi-Store Model of Memory - Short Term Memory

A

Duration max 20-30 seconds

Capacity 7±2 items

Encoding verbal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Multi-Store Model of Memory - Long Term Memory

A

Duration unlimited

Capacity unlimited

Encoding semantic (the meaning is encoded)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Multi-Store Model of Memory - Evaluation - Strengths

A

Numerous studies have supported the mode

The model broke memory into components that coudl be studied individually.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Multi-Store Model of Memory - Evaluation - Limitations

A

Descriptions of the STM & LTM are too simplistic

Effort of rehearsal is ignored
- Maintenance rather than elaborative rehearsal

Role of emotions are neglected

Information only flows in one direction

Lack description
- How does information go from acoustic to semantic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Serial Position Curve

A

Primacy effect
- Enhanced memory for items presented first (LTM)

Asympote

Recency effect
- Enhanced memory for items presented last (STM)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Glanzer & Cunitz (1966)

A

Aim:
- To investigate the recency effect in free recall (i.e. any order)

Pps:
- 46 army enlisted men

Procedure:
Each shown 15, 15-word lists
- 1 work appeared at a time, for 1 sec
- 2 secs interval
- each word read by the experimenter
- all monosyllabic nouns

After the last word in each list, the symbol # or a digit from 0-9 was shown

  • If the # symbol appeared, the pps were told to write immediately
  • If a nb appeared, the pps were to count from that number until the experimenter said “write”
  • Measured 10 or 30 seconds before syaing “write”
  • Each conditions were tested with 5 of the lists
  • Words & order of the delay conditions assigned at random
  • Pps tested individually
  • Each pp recieved a different set of lists and a different sequence of delay conditions
  • Pps given 1-5 min to complete recall of the list

Results

  • Mean nb of recalled words calculated
  • 10 secs delay reduced the recency effect
  • 30 secs delay eliminated the recency effect
  • 10 secs & 30 secs delays - still clear primacy effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Glanzer & Cunitz (1966) - Evaluation

A

True experiment

Strengths
Offers evidence for two separate stores of memory ∴ supporting the MSM

High reliability

Many controlled variables

Limitations
Low ecological validity

Low generalisability (only men)
- Only one culture (some culture could teach children to memorise well) 

Ignored pps understanding of the world

Applications
Lawyers scheduling witnesses

Managers scheduling a list of speakers at a conference

Teachers

Politicians

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

HM: Milner (1966)

A

Aim:
- To study the biological reasons for anterograde amnesia in patient HM

Procedure:
- Psychometric testing: IQ testing was given to HM. His results were above average

  • Direct observation of his behaviour
  • Interviews with HM and his family members
  • Cognitive testing: memory recall tests and learning tasks (reverse mirror drawing)
  • MRI scan to determine the extent of the damage done to HM’s brain

Results:

  • HM could not acquire new episodic knowledge (memory of events) and new semantic knowledge (general knowledge about the world)
  • The brain structures that were removed from his brain are important for long-term explicit memory
  • He was able to remember his house and could draw picture of the floor plan of his new home
  • HM had a capacity for working memory, because he was able to carry on a normal conversation
  • HM was able to recall the number 584, 15 minutes later, apparently by means of constant verbal rehearsal.
  • After the task was over, the number and HM’s strategy in remembering it were lost
  • Memories in the form of motor skills (i.e. procedural memories) were well maintained
  • He know how to mow a lawn
  • He showed improvements on the performance of new skills such as reverse mirror-drawing in which he had to acquire new eye-hand coordination
  • MRI scan showed that parts of HM’s temporal lobe, including the hippocampus, had the most damage.
  • Damage to hippocampus explains the problem of transferring short-term memory to long-term memory as this is the area where the neurotransmitter acetylcholine is believed to play an important role in learning and formation of explicitly memories
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly