Cognitive Approach Flashcards

1
Q

Define Memory

A

Memory is a fundamental cognitive process that allows individuals to encode, store, and retrieve information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who proposed the Multi Store Model of Memory (MSM)

A

Atkinson and Shiffrin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define MSM

A

The Multi-Store Model is a cognitive theory that explains how memory is structured. It suggests that memory is made up of three separate stores: sensory memory, short-term memory (STM), and long-term memory (LTM). IInformation first enters sensory memory, and if attended to, it moves into STM, where it remains for a short duration unless rehearsed. Through rehearsal, information is transferred to LTM for long-term storage; otherwise, it is lost. Each store has its own capacity, duration, and coding system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Glanzer and Cunitz investigate

A

Glanzer and Cunitz (1966) investigated the serial position effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define serial position effect

A

One effect that supports the Multi-Store Model of Memory (MSM) is the serial position effect, which shows that people tend to remember the first and last items in a list better than those in the middle. This includes the primacy effect (where early items are rehearsed and stored in long-term memory) and the recency effect (where later items are still held in short-term memory).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Aim of Glanzer & Cunitz (1966)

A

Glanzer & Cunitz aimed to investigate the serial position effect. The researchers wanted to see whether the position of a word in a list would affect the likelihood of it being recalled, and whether this would support the idea of distinct memory systems.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Glanzer & Cunitz procedure (1966)

A

In the procedure, participants were read a list of 15 words, one at a time, and then asked to recall as many of the words as they could in any order, a method known as free recall. The experiment included two main conditions. In the first condition, participants recalled the words immediately after hearing the list. In the second condition, there was a 30-second delay before recall, during which participants had to complete a distractor task, such as counting backwards, to prevent rehearsal of the words.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Findings of Glanzer & Cunitz (1966)

A

The findings showed that in the immediate recall condition, participants were most likely to remember words from the beginning and the end of the list. This created what is known as the serial position curve, demonstrating the primacy effect for words at the beginning (suggesting they were stored in LTM) and the recency effect for words at the end (suggesting they were still in STM).
However, in the delayed recall condition, the recency effect disappeared, while the primacy effect remained. This indicated that the words at the end of the list had not been transferred to long-term memory and were lost once short-term memory faded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evaluation of Glanzer & Cunitz (1966)

A

-high level of control.
By using word lists of equal length and including a distractor task in the delayed condition, the researchers were able to isolate the influence of rehearsal and short-term memory on recall. This increases the internal validity of the experiment, making it easier to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between the timing of recall and memory performance.

-lack of ecological validity. Remembering a list of unrelated words in a lab setting does reflect how we use memory in real life, which means the findings may not generalize well to everyday memory situations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

HM-Milner procedure

A

Milner conducted a longitudinal case study on a patient known as H.M. (Henry Molaison), who had undergone a lobotomy to treat severe epilepsy. During the surgery, large portions of his medial temporal lobes, including the hippocampus, were removed. HM underwent brain scans using MRI to confirm the damage. MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) is a brain imaging technique that allowed researchers to see the exact areas of damage in H.M.’s brain, helping them link his memory problems specifically to the hippocampus.
Milner studied H.M. using many different methods, such as IQ tests, interviews, observations, and memory recall tasks. She also gave him a reverse mirror drawing task, where he had to trace a shape while only seeing it through a mirror. This task was used to test his procedural memory, which is a type of long-term memory involved in learning motor skills.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

HM-Milner findings

A

HM’s episodic and semantic memory were significantly impaired, as he was unable to form new memories of events or general knowledge after the surgery.
However, his procedural memory remained intact, as shown by his ability to learn and perform the reverse mirror-drawing task, even though he could not recall learning it. Additionally,
HM’s STM was functional; he could retain information briefly with rehearsal but was unable to transfer it to LTM. The MRI confirmed damage to the hippocampus, highlighting its role in memory consolidation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the 3 types of long term memory (examined in HM-Milner)

A

Episodic memory is the memory of personal experiences and specific events, including the time and place they occurred. For example, remembering your last birthday party.

Semantic memory is the memory of general knowledge, facts, and concepts that are not tied to personal experiences. For example, knowing that Paris is the capital of France.

Procedural memory is the memory of how to perform tasks and actions, often learned through repetition and practice. For example, knowing how to ride a bike or tie your shoelaces.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Evaluation of HM-Milner

A

HM’s case provides strong biological evidence that STM and LTM are separate systems, reinforcing the MSM’s claims.
His inability to transfer information to LTM due to hippocampal damage suggests that this brain structure plays a critical role in memory consolidation.
However, as a case study of a single individual, HM’s memory deficits may not be fully representative of memory processes in the general population.
Furthermore, the fact that he could learn new motor skills, despite his inability to form new memories, indicates that LTM is more complex than the MSM proposes.
This highlights a limitation of the model, as it assumes that LTM is a singular system, whereas research suggests the existence of multiple types of long-term memory, such as episodic, semantic, and procedural memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who developed WMM

A

Baddeley and Hitch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

contrast MSM and WMM (intro)

A

While both models acknowledge the existence of short-term memory (STM) and long-term memory (LTM), they differ in their explanations of how information is processed within STM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define WMM

A

Working Memory Model, proposed by Baddeley and Hitch is a model of memory that challngese MSM. It suggests that short-term memory is not a single store, but a system made up of multiple components that work together manipulate information. The model includes the central executive, phonological loop, visuospatial sketchpad, and later the episodic buffer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Define Central executive

A

The central executive acts as a control system that directs attention and allocates resources to the other subsystems.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Define phonological loop

A

The phonological loop deals with verbal and auditory information. It includes the articulatory control system (inner voice), which rehearses words silently, and the phonological store (inner ear), which briefly holds sound-based information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Define visuospatial sketchpad

A

The visuospatial sketchpad handles visual and spatial information, such as images, layouts, or movements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Define Episodic buffer

A

The episodic buffer is a temporary store that integrates information from the phonological loop, visuospatial sketchpad, and long-term memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

AIm of Landry and Bartling

A

To investigate whether articulatory suppression would influence the recall of a list of phonologically dissimilar letters,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Define Articulatory suppression

A

Articulatory suppression is the process of inhibiting memory performance by speaking while being presented with an item to remember.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Landry & Bartling Procedure

A

in this experiment, participants were randomly divided into two groups: an experimental group and a control group. Both groups were shown a list of seven phonologically dissimilar letters—letters that do not sound alike. The control group was asked to memorize and recall the letters without any interference. In contrast, the experimental group had to repeat the numbers “1” and “2” continuously while viewing and recalling the letters, a task known as articulatory suppression. Each participant completed ten trials, and their accuracy in recalling the letters in the correct order was recorded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Findings of Landry & Bartling

A

The findings showed that participants in the control group recalled significantly more letters correctly than those in the experimental group. The reduced performance in the experimental group suggests that when the phonological loop is overloaded, memory for verbal information is impaired, highlighting the WMM’s idea that short-term memory consists of specialized components.

25
Evaluation of Landry & Bartling
It also had high internal validity due to the controlled laboratory setting. However, one limitation is its low ecological validity, as recalling random letters while repeating numbers is not a task commonly encountered in real life. Additionally, the study only focused on one component of the Working Memory Model and may not reflect how memory works in everyday settings.
26
Define Schema theory
Schema Theory is a cognitive theory that suggests that people organize and interpret information using schemas; mental frameworks built from past experiences. New information is processed through assimilation (fitting it into existing schemas) or accommodation (modifying schemas to fit new information). Schemas help us make sense of the world and guide memory, perception, and understanding. They can change over time as we gain new experiences.
27
Loftus & Palmer aim
The aim of Loftus and Palmer's study was to investigate how the wording of questions could influence the memories of eyewitnesses, particularly in relation to estimating the speed of cars involved in a traffic accident.
28
Loftus & Palmer procedure
The researchers conducted an experiment with university students who were divided into groups. Each group watched a video of a car accident and then answered questions about what they had seen. The critical question was phrased differently for each group, using verbs such as "smashed," "collided," "bumped," "hit," or "contacted." After a week, the participants were asked whether they had seen any broken glass in the video, even though there was none. This was used to assess how the phrasing of the initial question influenced their memories of the event.
29
Loftus & Palmer Findings
The findings showed that participants' speed estimates were influenced by the verb used in the question. Those who heard the word "smashed" estimated a higher speed (about 40.5 mph) than those who heard "contacted" (about 31.8 mph). Additionally, those who were asked if they had seen broken glass after hearing "smashed" were more likely to falsely recall it, even though no glass was present in the video. This indicated that the way questions were phrased could distort eyewitness testimony and create false memories. The intensity of the verb used, such as "smashed," activated more intense schemas associated with a severe crash, which influenced participants' speed estimates and their recall of details like broken glass.
30
Evaluation of Loftus & Palmer
The use of a video ensured that all participants saw the same event, which increased the study's internal validity. Furthermore, the findings have important real-world applications, particularly in legal settings, where eyewitness testimony is crucial. However, the study has limitations. For one, it used university students as participants, which may not fully represent the general population, limiting the external validity. Additionally, watching a video is a different experience from witnessing a real-life accident, so the results may not fully reflect how people react in real-world situations. Lastly, some critics argue that the study may not account for the full range of factors that influence memory, such as individual differences in perception and attention.
31
Brewer & Treyens aim
The aim of Brewer and Treyens' 1981 study was to investigate the role of schemas in memory recall. Specifically, they wanted to see how participants' expectations based on their schemas of an office environment would influence their recollection of objects in an unfamiliar office setting.
32
Brewer & Treyens procedure
In terms of the procedure, the study involved 30 university students who were invited to a laboratory and told they would be participating in a study on memory. They were led into an office-like room that contained both typical office items (like a desk and a chair) and some unusual items (like a skull and a brick). After being in the room for about 35 seconds, the participants were taken to another room and asked to recall the objects they had seen in the office. They were given three types of recall tasks: free recall (write down everything they remembered), recognition (choose from a list of objects), and a drawing task (sketch the layout of the office).
33
Brewer & Treyens findings
Participants were more likely to recall items that were congruent with the schema of an office, such as desks, pens, or books—even if those items were not actually present. In contrast, incongruent items, like a skull, were often omitted during free recall but were more likely to be remembered during the verbal recognition task. This indicates that while schema-inconsistent items may be noticed, they are less likely to be retrieved without cues. Additionally, schema-driven errors were observed, where participants falsely recalled schema-consistent objects that were never there, demonstrating how schemas can distort memory by filling in gaps with expected information.
34
Brewer & Treyens findings
However, the study also has limitations. The sample was small and consisted of university students, meaning the results may not be generalizable to the wider population. Furthermore, the use of an artificial setting (a lab with a staged office) may not reflect how people recall information in more naturalistic environments, which could limit the ecological validity of the findings. Despite these limitations, the study successfully illustrated the impact of schemas on memory and has been influential in cognitive psychology.
35
Evaluate Schema theory
While schema theory has strong empirical support, it also has limitations. One major limitation is that cognition cannot be directly observed; researchers can only infer schema use from behavior, which makes it difficult to measure schemas objectively. Many supporting studies, like Brewer and Treyens, were conducted in artificial laboratory settings, which reduces ecological validity. In real-world settings, memory might not be as easily distorted. However, despite these limitations, schema theory has been widely applied across fields like education, showing its versatility. It provides a powerful explanation for why memory is reconstructive and why memory distortion often occurs.
36
Define DPM (Dual processing model of memory)
The dual process theory, developed by Daniel Kahneman (2011), argues that the human brain operates within two distinctive systems: system 1, and system 2. System 1 is fast, automatic, and intuitive. It often relies on heuristics, which are mental shortcuts that help people make quick decisions without using much effort. While heuristics can be useful in everyday situations, they can also lead to cognitive biases or errors in judgment. System 2, on the other hand, is slower, more deliberate and logical. It is used for more complex or unfamiliar tasks that require careful thought and reasoning.
37
Define anchoring bias
The anchoring bias is a cognitive bias where individuals rely too heavily on the initial piece of information offered, which serves as an anchor when making decisions
38
Aim of Tversky & Kahneman
The aim of Tversky and Kahneman's 1974 study was to investigate the effect of anchoring bias on numerical estimation
39
Tversky & Kahneman procedure
Tversky & Kahneman conducted a labatory experiment, where the participants were asked to estimate the value of a complex mathematical equation. One group was given the equation in descending order: 8 × 7 × 6 × 5 × 4 × 3 × 2 × 1, while the other group saw it in ascending order: 1 × 2 × 3 × 4 × 5 × 6 × 7 × 8. They were given only 5 seconds to make their estimate. The actual answer to the equation is 40,320, but the quick time limit forced them to rely on intuition rather than calculation.
40
Tversky & Kahneman findings
The results seemed to demonstrate the anchoring effect, as the descending group which had a high anchor produced significantly higher estimates than the ascending group, despite both expressions equalling the same value. This demonstrated how anchoring influences judgments, and the decision-making process as a result.
41
Evaluation of Tversky & Kahneman
The study's use of an objective math task, allowed for a clear illustration of the anchoring effect. The use of a controlled experimental design increased its internal validity However, a limitation is that the task was artificial and performed under time pressure, which may not reflect how people make real-life decisions—so the study may lack ecological validity. Additionally, participants were students, which could limit generalizability to broader populations.
42
Aim of Englisch & Mussweiler
The aim of Englich and Mussweiler’s study was to investigate the influence of anchoring bias in legal decision-making, specifically whether a prosecutor’s sentencing demand would influence a judge’s final verdict, even if the demand was arbitrary
43
Englisch & Mussweiler procedure
ENglisch & Mussweiler conducted a true experiment using independent samples design. In the procedure, young German judges were given a case summary of a rape trial, including relevant evidence. After reading the summary, they were told that the prosecutor was demanding either a low sentence (2 months) or a high sentence (34 months) in prison. The judges were then asked to recommend their own sentence for the case.
43
FIndings of Englisch & Mussweiler
The findings showed a significant difference between the two groups. Judges who were given the higher anchor recommended a much longer sentence compared to those who received the lower anchor. This demonstrated that even experienced legal professionals were susceptible to anchoring bias, adjusting their judgments based on an irrelevant starting point.
44
Evaluation of Englisch & Mussweiler
the study provides strong evidence for the power of cognitive biases in real-world decision-making, especially in legal contexts where objectivity is crucial. It has practical implications for how sentencing recommendations might unconsciously influence judges. However, a limitation is that the study was conducted using a hypothetical case in a controlled setting, which may not fully reflect how judges behave in actual courtrooms—raising questions about ecological validity. Additionally, the sample of judges was relatively small and mostly young, which may affect the generalizability of the results to more experienced judges.
45
Evaluation of DPM
The dual processing model provides a useful framework for understanding decision-making, but it also has several limitations. One major critique is that it may be overly simplistic, as it assumes a clear distinction between System 1 and System 2 thinking when, in reality, the two systems likely interact rather than function independently. Additionally, the model does not fully address the role of emotion in decision-making. In real-world scenarios, decisions are often driven by fear, excitement, or stress, which can influence how both System 1 and System 2 operate. Another limitation is that defining System 1 and System 2 thinking is not always straightforward. For example, fast processing is often assumed to be System 1 thinking, which is not necessarily true
46
Define reconstructive memory
Reconstructive memory theory suggests that memory is not a perfect recording of events, but rather an active and reconstructive process that is shaped and influenced by various factors including schemas, and levels of processing.
47
opening sentence for "to what extent is one cognitive process reliable?)
One cognitive process that is often studied for its reliability is memory, specifically through the reconstructive memory theory.
48
Define Levels of processing theory
levels of processing theory suggests that the depth at which information is processed impacts how well it is retained and retrieved.
49
Define Flashbulb memories
Flashbulb memories are vivid and detailed memories of emotionally significant or surprising events.
49
Procedure of Neisser & Harsch
In the procedure, university students were asked to fill out a questionnaire the day after the 1986 Challenger disaster. They answered questions about how they found out, where they were, who they were with, and what they were doing. Two and a half years later, some of the original participants were asked to fill out the same questionnaire again, and their answers were compared to their original responses. They were also asked to rate their confidence in the accuracy of their memory.
50
Aim of Neisser & Harsch
The aim of Neisser and Harsch (1992) was to investigate the reliability of flashbulb memories, by studying how accurately people recalled the Challenger disaster over time.
51
Findings of Neisser & Harsch
The findings showed that although participants were very confident in the accuracy of their memories. However there was significant discrepancies between the initial and later reports, with many participants falsely recalling details. This finding challenges the assumption that memories, especially of highly emotional events, remain stable over time,
52
To what extent is one cognitive process reliable
53
Aim of Kulkofsky et al
The aim of Kulkofsky et al was to investigate how culture influences the role of emotion in the formation of flashbulb memories, by comparing how people from individualistic and collectivistic cultures recall emotionally significant public events.
54
Procedure of Kulkofsky et al
In the procedure, participants from five countries—some representing individualistic cultures (like the USA and the UK) and others representing collectivistic cultures (like China) were asked to recall public events of national or international significance that had occurred in their lifetime. The events had to be unexpected and emotionally impactful. Participants were then asked a series, including where they were, how they felt, and how important the event was to them. The researchers also collected data on how often the event was discussed with others and how much personal relevance it held.
55
Findings of Kulkofsky et al
The findings showed that participants from individualistic cultures were more likely to report having vivid, detailed flashbulb memories of emotional events. They were also more likely to mention personal involvement and emotional reaction as part of their memory. In contrast, participants from collectivistic cultures, such as China, were less likely to form flashbulb memories based on personal emotions and were less likely to talk about the events with others, possibly due to cultural norms that discourage openly expressing personal feelings
56
Evaluation of Kulkofsky et al
In evaluation, the study highlights how culture plays a role in the emotional processing of memory, supporting the idea that emotion can influence memory formation but that this effect is not universal. A strength of the study is that it uses cross-cultural sampling, increasing its relevance across different populations. However, a limitation is that responses rely on self-report, which may be affected by memory distortion or cultural expectations. Still, the study supports the idea that emotional significance contributes to memory vividness, especially in cultures that value personal expression.
57