classification and diagnosis of SZ Flashcards

including Issues with

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the issues surrounding the classification and diagnosis of schizophrenia

A

Reliability and validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define reliability (of a diagnosis)

A

The level of agreement and consistency of the diagnosis by different psychiatrists across time and cultures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define inter-rater reliability

A

The level of agreement and consistency of the diagnosis by different psychiatrists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define test-retest reliability

A

The level of agreement and consistency of a diagnosis over time given no change in symptoms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define Validity (of a diagnosis)

A

The extent to which SZ is a unique syndrom with characteristics, symptoms, and signs. To be valid, patients with SZ should have different symptoms from patients with other disorders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the issues affecting validity

A
  • co-morbidity
  • gender bias
  • culture bias
  • symptom overlap
  • range of symptoms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

define co-morbidity

A

When 2 or more conditions occur together in the same individual at the same time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

define culture bias

A

A tendecy to interpret all phenomena through the ‘lens’ of one’s own culture, ignoring the effects that cultural differences might have on behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define symptom overlap

A

Shared symptoms that could lead to an incorrect diagnosis. Often calls into question teh validity of classification.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define range of symptoms

A

The are a range of symptoms that could be present for a diagnosis of SZ. e.g. positive and negative symptoms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Give evidence for co-mobitity affecting validity

A

Buckley et al 2009:
found that 50% of patients with SZ have depression or substance abuse, 29% had PTSD and 23% had OCD.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Give evidence for gender bias affecting validity

A

Longnecker et al 2010:
found that since the 1980s men have been diagnosed more than women
Cotten et al 2009:
suggests this underdiagnosis is due to women having more closer relationship so get more support which leads to women with SZ functioning better than men with SZ.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Give evidence for culture bias affecting validity

A

Keith et al 1991:
found that 2.1% of African Americans are diagnosed with SZ compared to 1% of the white population. Many people from african cultures believe and praised for being able to communicate with ancestral spirits. This means they are more likely to report these experiences which are often misinterpreted as symptoms of SZ.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Give evidence of symptom overlap affecting validity

A

There is considerable overlap between symptoms of SZ and other disorders. e.g. bipolar disorder. This means that it is hard to define the boundries between SZ and other disorders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

give evidence of range of symptoms affecting validity

A

2 individual could display very different behaviour but still be diagnosed with SZ.
for example the DSM-5 requires one positive symptoms whereas the ICD-10 requires 2 negative symptoms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Give evidence for the reliablity of diagnosis of SZ

A

Osório et al 2019:
reports excellent reliability for SZ diagnosis (DSM-5) with an inter-rater agreement of +9.7 and a test-retest reliability of +9.2. This means that the diagnosis of SZ is consistently applied.

17
Q

Give evidence against the reliability of diagnosis of SZ

A

Cheniaux et al 2009:
had 2 psychiatrists independantly diagnose 100 people using both the DSM and ICD criteria. Inter-rater reliability was poor, with one psychiatrist diagnosing 26 with SZ using DSM and 44 using ICD. The other diagnosed 13 with SZ using the DSM and 24 using the ICD. This poor reliability is a weakness of diagnosis of SZ.

18
Q

What are the implications for a lack of reliability and validity when diagnosis SZ

A

A lack of reliability and validity in diagnosising SZ may result in misdiagnoses leading to providing incorrect or unnecessary treatment.

19
Q

What are the advantages of classification and diagnosis of SZ

not in essay plan

A
  • Communication (between mental health professionals)
  • treatment (appropriate)
  • prognosis (provides info)
  • cause (can aid research)
20
Q

What are the issues when classifiying and diagnosing SZ

A
  • misdiagnosis
  • labelling
  • historical/ cultural context
21
Q

Explain what is meant by misdiagnosis

A

individuals may be given the wrong treatment

22
Q

explain what is meant by labelling as a issue of classifying and diagnosis SZ

A

Diagnosis leads to labelling. This can be helpful in providing the appropriate treatment, but can be stigmatised and lead to a self-fufilling prophesy

23
Q

explain what is meant by historical/ cultural context as a issue of classifying and diagnosis SZ

A

Disorders in the diagnostic manuals may reflect social/political attitudes at the time e.g. homosexuality was included in the early manuals as a mental disorder. Not understanding an individual’s cultural frame of reference also leads to problems with diagnosis.

24
Q

Breifly outline Rosenhan

A

Rosenhan had himself and 8 of his collegues who had no symptoms or history if mental disorders set up appointments at metal hospitals under fake names, occupations and employment. At the appointment they complained of hearing a voice saying “empty”, “hollow” and “thud”. Once they were admitted the psudopatients stopped simulating any psychiatric symptoms.

25
Q

Evaluate Rosenhan

A

S – field study – higher in ecological validity than a lab
S - participant observation – got a lot of detailed data without the problem of demand characteristics
S – ethical - debrief to staff
W – ethical – staff being deceived

26
Q

Give examples of positive symptoms of SZ

A
  • hallucinations
  • delusions
27
Q

Give examples of negative symptoms of SZ

A
  • avolition
  • speech poverty
28
Q

What is the prevelance rate of SZ in the general public

A

1%

29
Q

When is the onset for SZ typically

A

early adult life - although this is later in women

30
Q

describe how SZ is an episodic illness

A

there are periods of psychotic disturbances with periods of normal functioning

31
Q

define hallucinations

A

an unusual sensory illness

32
Q

Define delusions

A

irrational beliefs that can take many forms

33
Q

Give some example of different delusions

A
  • delusions of control - false belief that others can control their actions
  • delusion of grandure - false belief that one possesses superior qualities such as genius or jesus.
  • paranoia - false beliefs that a person or some individuals are plotting against them or members of their family
34
Q

define speech poverty

A

a reduction in quality and amount of speech

35
Q

define avolition

A

lack of interest and motivation or inability to engage in goal-directed behaviour

36
Q

define positive symptom

A

Seen as an addition to a person’s normal behaviour

37
Q

define negative symptom

A

Involve losses of behaviour seen as normal