Class session flashcards, terms and concepts
Nature & Nurture
Also known as “genetics vs environment”. Early psychologists believed nature to be the prime factor of development, but it’s really a mix. Genetics can play a role in susceptibility to certain illnesses, but they need environmental triggers.
The Active Child
Main tenet of Piaget’s theory on development. Children influence their own environment and therefore their own development. They choose what to learn about, are naturally curious, and grow on their own.
Continuity/Discontinuity
Continuous development: A tree growing larger but remaining structurally the same. Discontinuous development: A moth going from caterpillar to pupae to moth. Piaget believed development to be discontinuous, but in reality childrens’ development is more on the continuous side.
Sociocultural context
It’s important to understand the culture a child is growing up in, and its impact on how they think. IE holistic thinking vs analytic thinking (remember social psych?)
Individual differences
Kids are all different. While general statements may be made about how children develop, each will develop differently and at different times, especially with things like spacial awareness.
Ethical concern of developmental psych
It’s hard to get informed consent from children and infants. You have to be really careful with experiments.
Vaugh Et Al 1984
Example of a CROSS SECTIONAL DESIGN. Tested 3 age groups, and their abilities to refrain from eating a raisin or touching a toy phone. Results: Children who were older were able to wait longer, on average, than younger children.
Cohort Effect
Bias/Error in psych studies caused by the differences in children of being born in different time periods (experiencing different environments). Weakness of CROSS SECTIONAL DESIGN.
Pros and cons of CROSS SECTIONAL DESIGN
PRO: Efficient, and reveals differences in age groups. CON: Cohort effect, only shows age difference, not change
Pros and cons of LONGITUDINAL DESIGN
PRO: Shows change in individuals over time. CON: inefficient, small sample sizes = biased, Attrition, practice effects
Practice Effect
Bias in sampling where someone being tested on the same thing several times will naturally get better at it simply by having that test experience, not by actually improving. flaw of LONGITUDINAL DESIGN
Attrition
Loss of study participants over time.