Class 4 Flashcards
Administration Notes
Number consecutively through the test
Use location sheets
Record verbatim
Expect to be anxious - learn to manage it
Treat the TA like a client (take charge)
Be on time to meeting and be sure you have the materials
Start face to face but when you start the admin, sit side by side, slightly behind
Helpful Rorschach Listserve Advice Administration
“When recording responses during the CP, I often struggle to divide my attention between hearing/typing responses and looking at the examinee/card for location info. If I’m too focused on recording accurate responses, I often neglect to (visually) capture accurate location, or vice versa. If the former, I tend to follow up with extra questions about location which then lead to unnecessary responses.” Bob Erard
Bob Erard continued
“I don’t think there is any easy answer, but if you follow the principle of letting the respondent take the lead, you develop a mindset in which you expect the respondent to tell you if there are special location features that are important to the percept rather than chasing around for them. Most locations are Ws and Ds in conventional places, and even most Dd responses are those that experienced examiners have heard before. If the respondent hasn’t said something or gestured in some way to suggest otherwise, you can often safely assume that the location is what it appears to be.”
Bob Erard continued
“Particularly if you begin the CP a recommended, telling the respondent that you want to know where it is seen on the card and what makes it look that way, and reinforce that a couple of times, the respondent will usually give you enough information about location without too much additional clarification.”
Barry Ritzler
Don’y ask a person to run their finger around the response. It can result in more Dd 99 and fewer vague Developmental Quality scores.
Synthesis Thresholds
Positive threshold examples for coding Sy:
“leaning on” or “leaning against,” “touching,” “looking at each other,” “standing behind (when one object obscures another),” “a bird on a branch,” “a person casting a shadow,” “a person on a rug,” “a fetus with its umbilical cord attached,” “flying above this object,” “lying next to,” “lying beside one another,” or one object “coming from” another, “trees on a pond.”
Negative threshold examples that are not coded for Sy: “a garden scene with yellow flowers, kind of like roses, daffodils, tomato horn worms,” “an underwater scene…. there’s fish, rocks, plants,” “a landscape with rocks, trees, and a pond,” “a sculpture of a bear and a fish”
Pairs (2)
Two identical objects symmetrical on each side of the blot midline (not parts that come in pairs, like eyes, boots, hands of a whole person)
Must be identical in all respects
> If differentiated in any way, do not score pair
(Goes into summary calculations related to symmetry)
Often use “two” but sometimes use plural to convey this, or “a couple of”
Don’t score pair when reflection is scored
Example:
Card VII. 2 little Indian girls looking at each other. – Head here, face, nose, with bangs here. (WMTLL Indians?) Their feathers are going up behind them.
Form Quality
o - Ordinary (form fit that is relatively frequent and accurate)
u - Unusual (form fit that is of intermediate frequency or accuracy)
- Minus (form fit that is infrequent and inaccurate)
N - None (no object with definite form or outline, BUT refer to FQ Table for exception)
*Refer to Form Quality tables in Chapter 6 RPAS manual. If not included, use extrapolation.
If a response has multiple objects, code the FQ of the material objects (not an inconsequential part of the response) with the lowest FQ
FQ reflects conventional and accurate ways of processing information
FQ Tables
FQ tables are based on accumulated FQ tables (Beck et al (1961), Hertz (1970), Exner (2003), and international sample
Based on:
- Fit (derived from multiple judges from 11 countries)
- Frequency (from the multiple data sources above)
Extrapolation
FQ extrapolations must have the same shape, form features, and spatial orientation (not just content)
Extrapolation for Single Objects
- Search the FQ tables for responses with similar shapes. (if it is Dd99). If straightforward, assign the FQ.
- Search like areas.
- Search subcomponents of an object e.g., bird > wings; bull > horns
- Consider results and make a determination.
Extrapolation for Multiple Objects
Score the lowest form quality of important components
Validity
Do indicators measure what we think they measure?
Conclusions
Both Rorschach and MMPI have criterion-related validity effect sizes of substantial magnitude
Additional Consideration
These studies do not address the pattern of scores within a test, much less a pattern among multi-method tests, which is the basis of good psychological assessment
Move beyond the question of global validity and focus on individual scales and indices
> NOT ‘is the Rorschach valid’, rather ‘is this or that indicator valid”
Study of Validity of Individual Indicators
Published in Psychological Bulletin
A Review of the Validity Research on the Rorschach CS Variables
- A systematic meta-analysis for each of the individual CS indicators
- Goal: to estimate construct validity of Rorschach indicators
Summary
Most variables in R-PAS have meta-analytic support
R-PAS variables have more construct validity meta-analyses documenting their validity than any other multiscale assessment measure
Determinants
The most complex feature of scoring
Why something looks the way it does?
Information can be relayed in many ways:
- Directly - “The shading gives that impression,” “it is shaped that way”
- Indirectly - key words
Determinants (cont.)
Movement
- Human movement (M)
- Animal movement (FM)
- Inanimate movement (m)
Color (FC, CF, C)
Shading
- Achromatic color (C’)
- Texture (T)
- Vista (V)
- Diffuse Shading (Y)
Form Dimension (FD)
Reflection (r)
Form (F)