Children-Protection 1 & 2 Flashcards
INTRO- what parts and act?
Part III, Part IV and Part V of the CA 1989
what is part 3 for?
is to safeguard, promote the welfare of children and those children are defined as children in need
what is part 4 for?*
is about parents and the local auth working in partnership, part 4 is about compulsory itnervertion by things called care or supervision orders
what is part 5 for?
is emergency protection so that’s how the act is divided up
overview of child protection?
Overview if parents aren’t looking after children properly then the state can step in- these are the ways the state can step in family to safeguard children
what happened btw 2008-2012?
Between 2008 and 2012 – 50% rise in care order applications
1 reason for rise?
more high profile cases of child abuse going undetected = baby p case,
- social services are becoming more vigilant
- lots of different ways of how abuse is viewed
What is abuse?
- Abuse and neglect are forms of maltreatment of a child.
- Somebody may abuse or neglect a child by inflicting harm, or by failing to act to prevent harm.
- Children may be abused in a family or in an institutional or community setting; by those known to them or, more rarely, by a stranger. They may be abused by an adult or adults or another child or children.
time limit for orders?
26 week limit for care or supervision orders (Children and Families Act 2014)- court has to deal within this time frame
GENERAL DIFF- what about the evidence?
not easy to tell child harmed, also diff with evidence to look into future to say who is going to harm child- in def’s it looks at child is actually suffering harm or likely to suffer harm so its
- How much harm should happen before court intervenes- interevention can be harmful- balancing act of when to and not int.
case for general diff?
Re S-B (Children) [2009]
- If abuse is established, what is the correct response?
best response might not always be to remove child, cause u might remove child from home then place child in place where they feel very vunerable, so it might be better to exclude the abuser
POSS CONFL- Possible conflicts with ECHR?
Echr obvs has impact here, so you have a right to right private and family life
what are the possible conflicts?
- Paragraph 2 of Article 8 (right to private and family life) - says it okay to intervene
- Any removal of child automatic infringement but justified if it protects the rights and freedoms of others-if remove protected by this art - Abused children have a right to Article 8
- Article 3 – Prohibition of torture-has right to protect child from torture and inhumane and degrading treatment
- Article 2 – Right to life- protect children from death (risk of death) so you have got sort of balance
quite wooly rules
MAIN- Main Provisions?
- Provision of Services (s 17, s 20)
- Investigations (s 47, s 37, s 43)
- Compulsory Intervention
(s 44, s 33, s 35)
PROVISIONS- what is the starting point?
A. Children ‘in need’ – s.17- every local auth has a duty to provide services or children in need
- read so not confined to children- low lev int if parents and local auth work togev for help, prevention better than cure- if fail to engage step up level of int
so what should you say in exam q?
that failure to engage at lower level means more intervention at higher level
what does s.7 Children and Young Persons Act 2008?
imposes general duty on the Secretary of State to promote the well-being of children
what is s. 7(10)?
Who is a child ‘in need’?- not the cause of the need but the level - so if it’s the lack of parental skills they’ll bring someone in to advise,
- if its cos child has disability they can provide help , because of lack of resources in need
what is s 17(11)?
Definitions of disabled, development and health-isabeled etc means physical and mental health
what do these sections give?
IT IS A WIDE DEF GIVES THE LA LOTS OF POWER
If a child is assessed as being ‘in need what do they offer?
- advice, home help, travel facilities, counselling, accommodation and cash (s.17(6) and Schedule 2 Paragraph 8)- cant help unless satis s.17(3)- accom also important
- s.17(3) – ‘provided with a view to promoting or safeguarding the child’s welfare’
- no ‘right’ to services
R (G) v Barnet London Borough Council; R (W) v Lambeth London Borough Council; R(A) v Lambeth London Borough Council [2003]-= duty not a right, so even if you are in need it doesn’t mean you can get these things cos u might not satisfy this, it’s a duty not right, and you cannot compel a la to act - Schedule 2 Paragraph 7 encourages the use of these measures to avoid care proceedings- is a duty once u think about taking ur child into care,the la has a duty to ask or consider whether s.17 order would be better so when youre taking a child into care yu have to consider whether s.17 order would achieve the same cos u must avoid care proceedings at all costs
what is the accommodation section?
s.20
what does accom cover?
this covers lost and abandoned children, where there is nobody with parental respons and 20 1 c is to do with children that have been excluded from family homes= naughty and parents don’t want to live with them anymore