Charles I and Parliament Flashcards
Pym's Junto
Who was John Pym
- Son of wealthy landowner and educated at Oxford
- Elected to parliament in 1627 and sat in every parliament until his death in 1643
Pym’s Role in the Short Parliament
Made an opening speech which outline the problems in the Kingdom, covering the themes of…
- Infringement of parliamentary liberties
- Innovations in religion ‘corrupt men of the clergy abuse the truth of god’
- Violations of property = ‘men’s goods are seized’
Pym’s Junto’s expectations at the opening of the long parliament
- Group of MPs who opposed Charles and his evil counsellors - wanted to manipulate parliament in pursuit of their own ambitions
- The Junto was politically able to the political links and skills of Pym
- Many of the members were supporters of Sir Edward Coke
Edward Hyde - A Constitutional Royalist
- Became a Constitutional royalist during the Long Parliament to protect the king from taking any aggressive measures in the search fro a settlement
- As a royal adviser to Charles I, he produced answers to the nineteen propositions
The development of a Royalist party
- Bedford’s death in May 1641 led to MPs such as Pym attempting to solve crown and parliament relations which led to divisions in the party, leading to the development of the Royalist party
- Main divisions were…
- Preventing personal rule
- Bill of attainder
- Religion
- Moderates believed the actions of Pym posed a greater threat then Charles I - Moderates actions were labelled as ‘Constitutional Royalism’
The Short Parliament
- April 1640
- Called for money to finance the Bishop’s war
- Lord Finch = ‘King doesn’t require their advice, but an immediate vote of supplies’
- Dissolved as Charles was not being granted any subsidies - Charles even offered to get rid of ship money in return for 12 subsidies
- Relations worsened as a result and Charles appeared Autocratic
Issues flowing the dissolution of the Short Parliament
- Convocation was not dissolved which was what set laws for the church - Therefore gave produced a set of cannons which reassured that Laudianinsm had no ‘suspicion of revolt to popery.’
- ‘etc’ in the oath worried many about a Catholic takeover
Opening of the Long Parliament
- 3rd November 1640
- MPs were optimistic as they wanted to redress grievances and work with the king
- There was no suggestion of the Civil war
Pym’s opening speech
- 7th Nov 1640
- ‘Design to alter the kingdom’ which included religion, Attacks on parliamentary privileges and Catholics in leadership
Strafford and Laud arrested
- 13th November 1640
- Targeted because they are close to the king - seen as his evil counsellors - The MPs couldn’t attack the king
Bedford finance plan
- Dec 1640
- Bedford and Pym’s Junto wanted to work with the crown
Involved… - Abolition of financial and political aspects of the personal rule
- Return to the Elizabethan Protestant church
- Financial settlement which provided Charles with a fixed settlement
- Bridge appointments - Parliamentary leaders would be brought into the Privy council to ensure the changes were being made - Challenged the Kings prerogative right to choose his own advisers
Impact of the Bedford Finance plan
- May 1641
- Charles didn’t give any parliamentary men power within the Privy Council
- After the Triennial act Charles wouldn’t accept any more changes to the royal prerogative
Root and Branch petition
- 11th Dec 1640
- Called for the removal of the Laudian reforms and the reformation of the church
- Issue wasn’t resolved as their was division over the matter e.g. Fiennes for and Falkland against the petition
Triennial act
- Feb 1641
- Parliament should meet every 3 years - Increased parliaments power
- Passed easily - Shows MPs moderate position, only wanting regular conversations regarding the running of the country
- Charles agreed with such poor grace that many thought he would go back on his word
Trial of Strafford
- March 1641
- Accused of treason - Strafford defended himself well
- Radical MP’s passed the Bill of Attainder which meant that the Commons could just vote that someone was guilty
Vote of the Attainder
- 21st April 1641
- Warwick = supported the bill
- Bedford = Not support the bill
- Vote = 204 in Favour - 59 against
Army plot
- May 1641
- Plan to seize tower of London and release Strafford
The Protestation
- May 1641
- Pym’s Junto described Army plot as a Popish plot
- This took the the form of an oath to defend the Protestant religion
- Using Catholicism to scare people
Death of Bedford
- 9th May 1641
- Had been moderate and hope for a compromise settlement with the king
- Pym now has more power
Lords and Charles agree to Strafford’s attainder
- 8th to 10th May 1641
- Demonstrators encouraged by Pym stormed Whitehall ( King was staying here) and scared Charles into signing the the death warrant
- Charles now sees Pym as untrustworthy and a threat
Act against Dissolution
- 10th May 1641
- Parliament could only be dissolved if it gave consent
- Gives the parliament way more power
Charles announces intention to visit Scotland
- May 1641
- He wanted to negotiate peace personally
- Pym’s Junto feared he would strike up military alliance with them
The ten Propositions
- June 1641
- To defend the country from ‘Papists’ and ‘evil Counsellors’
Stated that… - Court should be cleansed of Catholics
-Parliament could approve the Kings counsellors
These propositions were not passed
Root and Branch petition discussed
- June 1641
- Many saw the removal of the bishops as undermining the whole order of society - Moderate protestants supported Charles instead