Chapter 9 -Regional Economic Integration Flashcards
Levels of integration
- Free trade area
- Customs union
- Common market
- Economic union
- Political union
The EU is at economic union meaning it has 1,2,3,4 but not political union
Regional Economic Integration
WTO must be notified, EU has been most ambitious
Free trade area
All barriers to the trade of goods and services among member countries are removed:
no discriminatory tariffs within trade agreement, each country can set its own standards for other countries
most popular form of integration (90%)
Customs Union
Eliminates trade barriers between member countries and adopts a common external trade policy. Usually with intent of further integration down the road
EU started as customs union
Common market
No barriers to trade among member countries, includes a common external policy, and allows factors of production to move freely among members (no restriction emigration/immigration)
–> requires harmony on fiscal, monetary and employment policies
EU did this
Economic Union
Involves the free flow of products and factors of production among member countries and the adoption of a common external trade policy, but it also requires a common currency, harmonization of members’ tax rates, and a common monetary and fiscal policy
EU is an economic union except
- not all countries adopted the EURO
- differences in tax rates and regulations
- some markets like the one for energy still not fully deregulated
Political union
A central political apparatus coordinates the economic, social, and foreign policy of the member states (EU is on the way to this, US independent states are example of this)
economic case for integration
- all countries gain from free trade and investment
- assumes ideal absence of barriers to the free flow of goods, services, and factors of production among nations
- regional economic integration can achieve better results than under WTO
- easier among limited amount of countries than the world
why better when smaller agreement than worldwide
coordination and policy harmonization,
reconciliation of perspectives
motivated by desire to exploit gains from free trade
political case for integration
creates incentives for political cooperation, reduce potential violent conflicts, enhance political weight in world when dealing with other countries
–> this is what underlies the EC in 1957, before the EU
Impediments to integration
high costs (benefit overall, but could cause losses for certain groups and painful adjustments like job losses) loss of national sovereignty (give up some extent to control monetary, fiscal and trade policies)
Case against regional integration
only beneficial if it creates more than it diverts trade
Trade creation
high-cost domestic producers are replaced by low-cost producers within the free trade area. May also occur when higher-cost external producers are replaced by lower-cost external producers within the free trade area
Trade diversion
Occurs when lower-cost external suppliers are replaced by higher-cost suppliers within the free trade area