Chapter 15 - Entry strategic alliances Flashcards

1
Q

International firms must consider

A
  1. The decision of which foreign markets to enter, when to enter them, and on what scale.
  2. The choice of entry mode.
  3. The role of strategic alliances.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Modes for serving foreign markets

A
  1. Exporting
  2. Licensing
  3. Franchising
  4. Joint-ventures
  5. Setting up a new wholly owned subsidiary in a host country
  6. Acquiring an established enterprise
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Strategic alliance

A

Cooperative agreements between potential or actual competitors.
Done in order to be predatory
Greater market access

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Strategic alliances include

A
– Cross-shareholding deals.
 – Licensing arrangements. 
– Formal joint ventures. 
– Informal cooperative arrangements. 
→ How does this differentiate from a merger and acquisition?
Merger: Combine with another company
Acquisition: Buy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

which foreign market based on

A
  1. size
  2. present and likely future wealth of consumers
  3. costs and risks
  4. value and international business can create in foreign market
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

benefit-cost-risk trade off

A

is likely to be most favorable in politically stable developed and developing nations that have free market systems, and where there is not a dramatic upsurge in either inflation rates or private-sector debt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Basic entry decisions:

A

which foreign market
timing of entry
scale of entry and category of commitment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Timing of entry

A

First-mover advantages: Preempt rivals and capture demand by establishing a strong brand name and customer satisfaction

  • > The cost advantage may enable the early entrant to cut prices below that of later entrants, thereby driving them out of the market
  • > Pioneering costs: Costs that an early entrant has to bear that a later entrant can avoid
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Scale of entry

A

Entering a market on a large scale involves the commitment of significant resources and implies rapid entry
-> Large scale entrant is more likely than the small-scale entrant to be able to capture first-mover advantage associated with demand preemption, scale economies and switching costs
Even some large firms prefer: small scale and then build slowly as they become more familiar with the market
-> Small-scale entry allows a firm to learn about a foreign market while limiting the firm’s exposure to that market

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Entry modes

A
  1. exporting
  2. Turnkey project
  3. Licensing
  4. Franchising
  5. Joint ventures
  6. Wholly owned subsidiaries
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Exporting pros

A

Avoids costs of establishing manufacturing operations in the host country
experience curve and location economies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Exporting cons

A

May not be appropriate if lower cost locations for manufacturing the product can be found abroad
High transport costs
Tariff barriers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Turnkey projects

A

->contractor agrees to handle every detail of the project for a client, including the training of operating personnel. At completion of the project, the foreign client is handed the “key” to a plant that is ready for full term operation
-> exporting process technology to other countries
Common in chemical, pharmaceutical, petroleum-refining and metal-refining industries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Turnkey pros

A

Preserve know-how valuable asset
Can earn great economic returns
Strategy is particularly useful when FDI is limited to host-government regulations
less risky than conventional FDI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Turnkey cons

A

The firm that enters into a turnkey deal will have no long term interest in the foreign country
One way around this is to take a minority equity interest in the operation
May inadvertently create a competitor
Selling a technology through a turnkey project is also selling competitive advantage to potential and/or actual competitors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Licensing agreement

A

An arrangement whereby a licensor grants the right to intangible property to another entity (the licensee) in exchange for royalty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Intangible property

A

Patents, inventions, formulas, processes, designs, copyrights and trademarks

18
Q

Licensing pros

A

no development costs/risks (good when a firm has no capital or does not want to commit)

  • > firm wishes to participate in a foreign market but is prohibited from doing so by barriers to investment
  • > when a firm has intangible property but doesn’t want to use it themselves
19
Q

Licensing cons

A

no tight control over manufacturing, marketing and strategy
cannot coordinate strategic moves across the country
lose control over its technology (must enter cross-licensing agreement (know-how against license))
Mostly for manufacturing firms

20
Q

Franchising

A

A specialized form of licensing in which the franchiser not only sells intangible property (normally a trademark) to the franchisee, but also insists that the franchisee agree to abide by strict rules as to how it does business.
Mostly for service firms

21
Q

franchising pros

A

Firm experiences lower costs and risks than opening a foreign market on its own
Helps build a global presence quickly

22
Q

franchising cons

A

May inhibit the firm’s ability to take profits out of one country to support competitive attacks in another
Quality control

23
Q

Joint ventures

A

Entails establishing a firm that is jointly owned by two or more otherwise independent firms

24
Q

Joint venture pros

A

Local partner’s knowledge of the host country’s competitive conditions, culture, language, political systems and business
Shared costs and risks

25
Q

Joint venture cons

A

Loss of technology control
Lack of control over subsidiaries
Conflicts and battles for control between the investing firms

26
Q

Wholly owned subsidiaries can be done 2 ways (owned 100%)

A

Greenfield venture

Acquisitions

27
Q

Greenfield venture

A

set up a new operation in host country

28
Q

Acquisition

A

acquire an established firm in a host nation

29
Q

Acquisitions pros

A

Can tightly control operations in different countries
Location and experience curve economies
100% share of profits
quick to establish

30
Q

Acquisition cons

A

Bear full costs and risk of establishing new market

31
Q

if firm has technology know-how

A

Licensing and joint venture arrangements should be avoided unless the technological advantage is transitory (can be moved back to you for your advantage)

32
Q

if firm has management know-how

A

Less risk for franchises or joint ventures

33
Q

If pressures for cost reduction

A

1) pursue some combination of exporting and wholly owned subsidiaries
2) Wholly owned marketing subsidiaries give the firm tight control that might be required for coordinating a globally dispersed value chain

34
Q

Pros of greenfield ventures

A

Gives the firm a much greater ability to build the kind of subsidiary company that it wants
Slower to establish
Risky, but less risky than acquisitions
Preemption by global competitors

35
Q

Choose acquisitions when

A

enter a market where there are already well-established incumbent enterprises
Global competitors are also interested in establishing a presence

36
Q

choose greenfield ventures when

A

There are no other competitors to be acquired (unique to us and only ones who can implant it)
The competitive advantage of the firm is based on the transfer of organizationally embedded competencies, skills, routines and culture

37
Q

Strategic Alliances pros

A

May facilitate entry into a foreign market
Allow firms to share the fixed costs and associated risks of developing new products or processes
Brings together complementary skills and assets that neither company could easily develop on its own
establish technological standards

38
Q

Strategic alliance cons

A

May give competitors a low-cost route to new technology and markets

39
Q

a good partner for strategic alliance

A

Helps the firm achieve its strategic goals
Has the capabilities the firm lacks
Is unlikely to try to opportunistically exploits its partner

40
Q

Alliance structure

A

Risk of giving away too much to the partner
risk of opportunism by a partner
Agree in advance to swap skills and technologies that the other (wants), thereby ensuring a chance for equitable gain
Cross-licensing agreements
Extract a significant credible commitment from the partner in advance

41
Q

How to make alliances work

A

Be sensitive to cultural differences
Build trust
Build relational capital (invest in the relationship)
Learn from the alliance partner and apply the knowledge within one’s own organization