Chapter 9 - Leadership in Teams Flashcards
Team
Commonplace to describe every work unit as a team.
In many causes, it is about leading. Leadership not necessarily performed by an individual - in team structure it is distributed/ shared.
Managers outside teams set targets but team is self managing to a significant extent.
Teams make decisions about?
How to deliver products/ services
Allocation of work
Rules
Historical roots of team based work
Scientific management (production systems) and bureaucracy (organisational structures and processes).
Scientific management
Division of labour -work divided into narrowest possible tasks, Based on efficiency, hierarchical structure and dividing tasks. Rational approach, popular and adapted in many organisations.
Time and motion studies - scientific system for calculating one best way to do task effectively.
Simple performance pay systems - workers paid based on output with money as only motivator.
Managers plan and control production - managers highly trained heads and workers as ignorant hands
Influence of Scientific Management
Spread through world in early 20th century, created basis for mass production
Spread form manufacturing to clerical work to health and public admin
Applied by Ford to development of production line manufacturing - boring for employees
Delivered massive productivity gains
The basis for so called Fordist mass production
The dominant approach until the 1970s and 80s
Taylorism
Application of apparently neutral, rational and scientific rules and procedures to work
Bureaucracy
Involves the application of Taylorism rules to who organisation.
Organisations structured hierarchically. Clear division of labour. Documented rules and procedures. Dominant organisational form in 20th century.
Problems with Taylorism and Bureaucracy
Rigidity of hierarchical structures and formal positions, rules and procedures restrict innovative problem solving. Only based on efficiency, automatisation, lacks care for employees.
Limits to division of labour - any efficiency gains from division of labour finite, limits creativity/ innovation, difficult to come up with new ideas
Boredom, frustration and demotivation of employees due to narrow repetitive jobs with little discretion.
Human Relations
Concerned with productivity but recognised limits of Taylorism, created basis for teamwork structure.
Limits in terms of productivity gains.
Bad for workers and may lead to industrial unrest.
Questioned if there was a better way to organise work?
e.g. Hawthorne experiments: set out to test effects of better illumination on productivity.
Almost incidentally found that workers who could work in groups and make some of their own decisions about production were happier and more productive.
Led to new way of thinking about what drives productivity. Shifted thinking about organising groups.
Key insights on human relations and group based work
Employees need groups to give their work meaning
Groups must have capacity to make meaningful decision, more autonomy and to develop own rules, norms and values.
If work is organised on a group basis, workers will be happier and more productive.
Rise of teams
Since 1990s there has been massive growth in popularity of team based work influenced by ideas of human relations - with maintenance of Taylorism and bureaucracy in many organisations.
Teams have potential to?
Deliver performance gains
Increase worker well being
Reduce managers’ workloads
Why are teams effective?
Problem solving: groups solve complex problems better than individuals.
Meet human needs and interact with others of different backgrounds e.g. cooperation, task variety, discretion, whole job, therefore increases satisfaction commitment and motivation.
Synergies between skills of different team members
Advantages of teams
Increased productivity
Job satisfaction and security
Easier to fix problems at a base level
Increased communication and support throughout business