Chapter 8. Unenforceability on Grounds of Public Policy (178-199) Flashcards
A promises to pay B $1,000 if the Buckets win their basketball game with the Hoops, and B promises to pay A $2,000 if the Hoops win. A state statute makes wagering a crime and provides that a promise such as A’s or B’s is “void.” Are these promises enforceable under public policy?
A’s and B’s promises are unenforceable on grounds of public policy. Any claims of A or B to restitution for money paid under the agreement are governed by the rules stated in Topic 5 of §§ 178–199. See § 199(b) and Illustrations 4 and 5 to that section. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 178(a)
A and B make an agreement by which A agrees to sell and B to buy, at a fixed price per bushel, one thousand bushels of wheat from A at any time that A shall choose during the following month. The state statute that makes wagering a crime does not apply to such an agreement and it does not offend any judicially declared public policy. Are these promises enforceable under public policy?
Enforcement of A’s and B’s promises is not precluded on grounds of public policy. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 178(a)
A borrows $10,000 from the B Bank, promising to repay it with interest at the rate of twelve per cent. A state statute that fixes the maximum legal rate of interest on such loans at ten per cent provides that a promise to pay a greater sum is “void” as usurious as to all the promised interest but not as to the principal. Is A’s promise enforceable under public policy?
A’s promise to pay the interest is unenforceable on grounds of public policy. The rule stated in § 184(2) does not make A’s promise to pay interest enforceable up to ten per cent because the legislation provides otherwise. Compare Illustration 5 to § 184. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 178(a)
A and B make an agreement for the sale of goods for $10,000, in which A promises to deliver the goods in his own truck at a designated time and place. A municipal parking ordinance makes unloading of a truck at that time and place an offense punishable by a fine of up to $50. A delivers the goods to B as provided. Is B’s promise enforceable under public policy?
Because the public policy manifested by the ordinance is not sufficiently substantial to outweigh the interest in the enforcement of B’s promise, enforcement of his promise is not precluded on grounds of public policy. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 178(c)
A promises to employ B and B promises to work for A, all work to be done on weekdays. The agreement is made on Sunday in violation of a statute that makes the doing of business on Sunday a misdemeanor. Are these promises possibly enforceable under public policy?
If the court decides that the public policy manifested by the statute is not sufficiently substantial to outweigh the interests in enforcement of A’s and B’s promises, it will hold that enforcement of their promises is not precluded on grounds of public policy. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 178(c)
A, the owner of a newspaper, promises B that he will publish a statement about C known by A and B to be false and defamatory if B pays him $10,000. B pays A $10,000. Is A’s promise enforceable under public policy?
A’s promise is one to commit a tort (§ 192) and is unenforceable on grounds of public policy. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 178(d)
B promises to pay A, the owner of a newspaper, $10,000 if he will publish a statement about C known by A and B to be false and defamatory. A publishes the libel. Is B’s promise enforceable under public policy?
B’s promise is one tending to induce A to commit a tort (§ 192) and is unenforceable on grounds of public policy. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 178(d)
A, the owner of a newspaper, promises B that he will publish a statement about C known by A and B to be false and defamatory if B will promise to pay him $10,000. B makes the promise. Are these promises enforceable under public policy?
A’s promise is one tending to induce A to commit a tort (§ 192). Both promises are unenforceable on grounds of public policy. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 178(d)
B promises to convey a tract of land worth $11,000 to A, the owner of a newspaper, if A pays B $1,000, B’s duty to be conditional on A’s publishing a statement about C known by A and B to be false and defamatory. A pays B $1,000 and publishes the libel. Is B’s promise enforceable under public policy?
B’s promise is one tending to induce A to commit a tort (§ 192) and is unenforceable on grounds of public policy. Compare § 185. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 178(d)
A pays B, a competitor, $10,000 for B’s promise not to compete with A for a year. Is B’s promise enforceable under public policy?
Although B’s refraining from competition with A would not in itself be improper, B’s promise not to compete with A unreasonably restrains B from competition (§ 186) and is unenforceable on grounds of public policy. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 178(d)
A promises to pay B, a competitor, $10,000 if he will refrain from competing with A for a year. Is A’s promise enforceable under public policy?
Although B’s refraining from competing with A would not in itself be improper, A’s promise unreasonably tends to induce B to refrain from competition (§ 186) and is unenforceable on grounds of public policy. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 178(d)
A induces B to make an agreement to buy goods on credit from A by bribing B’s purchasing agent. A delivers the goods to B. A’s bribe tends to induce the agent to violate his fiduciary duty. Is B’s promise enforceable under public policy?
B’s promise to pay the price is unenforceable on grounds of public policy. See § 193. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 178(d)
A, who wants to induce B to buy goods from him, promises to pay C $1,000 if he will bribe B’s purchasing agent to arrange the sale. C does so. C’s bribe tends to induce the agent to violate his fiduciary duty. Is A’s promise enforceable under public policy?
A’s promise is unenforceable on grounds of public policy. See § 193. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 178(d)
A, who wants to induce B to buy goods from him, promises to pay C $1,000 if he arranges the sale. C arranges the sale by bribing B’s purchasing agent. C’s bribe tends to induce the agent to violate his fiduciary duty. Is A’s promise enforceable under public policy?
A’s promise is unenforceable on grounds of public policy. See § 193. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 178(d)
A and B make an agreement for exclusive dealing that is unenforceable because unreasonably in restraint of trade (§ 186). A sells and delivers goods pursuant to the unenforceable agreement to C, who promises to pay the price. Is C’s promise enforceable under public policy?
Because the relation between C’s promise to pay the price and the unreasonable restraint is too remote, enforcement of C’s promise is not precluded on grounds of public policy. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 178(d)
A and B make a wagering agreement in violation of a statute that makes such agreements “void.” When A loses, C pays B at A’s request, and A promises C to pay him that amount. Is A’s promise enforceable under public policy?
Because the relation between A’s promise to pay C and the improper wager is too remote, enforcement of A’s promise is not precluded on grounds of public policy. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 178(d)
A agrees to reimburse B for any legal expenses incurred if B will go on C’s land in order to test a right of way that is disputed by A and C. B goes on C’s land. Is A’s promise enforceable under public policy?
Enforcement of A’s promise is not precluded on grounds of public policy, even if it is later determined that B has committed a trespass. Compare § 192. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 178(e)
A, a trustee under a will, makes an agreement with B in violation of A’s fiduciary duty. Are these promises enforceable under public policy?
If enforcement of A’s and B’s promises is desirable for the protection of the beneficiaries, it is not precluded on grounds of public policy. Compare § 193. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 178(e)
A, B, and C, directors of a bank, make notes payable to the bank in order to deceive the bank examiner. They agree that the notes shall be returned and cancelled after they have served their purpose. Are these promises enforceable under public policy?
Enforcement of the promises of A, B and C embodied in the notes is not precluded on grounds of public policy. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 178(e)
A and B make a written agreement that contains a term providing that “no prior negotiations shall be used to interpret this agreement.” Prior negotiations would otherwise be admissible to establish the meaning of the writing (§ 214(c)). How might these promises be possibly unenforceable under public policy?
If the court decides that the term would unreasonably deprive it of relevant evidence that would enable it to resolve an ambiguity in the agreement and thereby hamper it in the fair administration of justice, it will hold that the term is unenforceable on grounds of public policy. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 179(a)
A induces B to make an agreement to buy goods on credit from A by bribing B’s purchasing agent. A delivers the goods to B. A state statute makes such bribery a crime and gives B a civil action to recover the amount of the bribe against A. Is B’s promise possibly enforceable under public policy?
Although the statute already provides for a civil sanction, a court may decide that B’s promise to pay the price is unenforceable on grounds of public policy. Cf. Illustration 12 to § 178. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 179(b)
A, a corporation, makes an agreement to do work for B, a city. C, an official of B, is also a principal shareholder of A, and a statute prohibits the making of such agreements and subjects those who make them to penalties. A’s performance of the agreement is defective. Is A’s promise enforceable under public policy?
Since the statute was enacted to protect a class of persons to which B belongs against a class to which A belongs, enforcement of A’s promise is not precluded on grounds of public policy and B can recover damages from A for breach of contract. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 179(c)
A, an insurance company, issues a policy of fire insurance to B on his house. The policy differs from that required by a state statute prescribing a standard fire policy. B’s house is destroyed by fire. Is A’s promise enforceable under public policy?
Since the statute was enacted to protect a class of persons to which B belongs against a class to which A belongs, enforcement of A’s promise is not precluded on grounds of public policy and B can recover the insurance proceeds from A. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 179(c)
A employs B to work in his factory and promises to pay him double for the overtime if B works ten hours a day instead of the usual eight. A state statute, designed to protect the health of workers in such factories, provides a maximum period of employment of eight hours a day and makes violation a crime for both employer and employee. B works ten hours a day but A refuses to pay him extra for the overtime. Is A’s promise enforceable under public policy?
A court may decide that the statute was enacted to protect a class of persons to which B belongs against a class to which A belongs and that therefore enforcement of A’s promise is not precluded on grounds of public policy. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 179(c)
A, a bank, invests in a real estate mortgage. A statute prohibits it from making such investments and subjects it to penalties for doing so. Is the mortgage debt enforceable under public policy?
Since otherwise the creditors and shareholders of the bank, for whose protection the statute was enacted, would be injured, enforcement of the mortgage debt is not precluded on grounds of public policy and the bank may recover on the debt and foreclose the mortgage. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 179(c)
A and B make an agreement under which B promises to deliver to A goods. B already has a contract to deliver the goods to C, but A neither knows nor has reason to know this. On learning of B’s contract with C, A refuses to take the goods or pay the price. Is B’s promise enforceable under public policy?
Enforcement of B’s promise to deliver the goods to A is not precluded on grounds of public policy and A has a claim against B for damages. But see § 194. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 180(b)
A and B make an agreement under which A promises to pay B $10,000 in return for B’s promise to cut down trees on a specified tract of land. A knows that the land belongs to C rather than to A, but B neither knows nor has reason to know this. C prohibits entry on the land. Is A’s promise enforceable under public policy?
Enforcement of A’s promise to pay B $10,000 is not precluded on grounds of public policy and B has a claim against A for damages. As to the rights of A and B if A neither knows nor has reason to know that C is the owner, see § 198(b). Restatement 2d of Contracts § 180(b)
A, an insurance company, makes an agreement with B under which it promises to employ B for a year. A has not obtained a license required for it lawfully to do business, but B neither knows nor has reason to know this. On discovering it after he has begun to work, B promptly refuses further services. Is A’s promise enforceable under public policy?
Enforcement of A’s promise to employ B is not precluded on grounds of public policy and B has a claim against A for damages. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 180(b)
A and B make an agreement under which A, a builder, promises to build a house for B for $100,000. The plan and specifications involve violations of local building ordinances of which B neither knows nor has reason to know. On discovering the violations, B promptly refuses to allow A to proceed with the work. Is A’s promise enforceable under public policy?
Enforcement of A’s promise to build the house is not precluded on grounds of public policy and B has a claim against A for damages. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 180(b)
A, the owner of a newspaper, promises B that he will publish a statement about C that A knows is false and defamatory if B pays him $10,000. B, who is ignorant of the law of torts and does not know the statement is actionable as libel, pays A $10,000. Is A’s promise enforceable under public policy?
A’s promise to publish the statement is unenforceable on grounds of public policy. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 180(b)
A, an unlicensed broker, agrees to arrange a transaction for B, for which B promises to pay A $1,000. A city ordinance requires persons arranging such transactions to be licensed as a result of paying a fee, with no inquiry into competence or responsibility. A arranges the transaction. Is B’s promise enforceable under public policy?
Since the licensing requirement is designed merely to raise revenue and does not have a regulatory purpose, enforcement of B’s promise is not precluded on grounds of public policy. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 181(b)
A, an unlicensed plumber, agrees to repair plumbing in B’s home, for which B promises to pay A $1,000. A state statute, enacted to prevent the public from being victimized by incompetent plumbers and to protect the public health, requires persons doing plumbing to be licensed on the basis of an examination, the posting of a bond, and the payment of a fee, and makes violation a crime. A does the agreed work. May B’s promise be enforceable under public policy?
A court may decide that the public policy against enforcement of B’s promise outweighs the interest in its enforcement, and that B’s promise is unenforceable on grounds of public policy. Compare Illustration 1 to § 183. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 181(c)
A, an unlicensed milk dealer, promises to deliver to B, a licensed milk dealer, milk for which B promises to pay $20,000. A state statute designed for the purpose of economic regulation of the milk industry provides that “no dealer shall buy or sell milk without a license,” and makes violation a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $500 and imprisonment for up to 6 months. A delivers the milk to B, but B refuses to pay the price. How could B’s promise be enforceable under public policy?
In view of all the circumstances, including the discrepancy between the forfeiture by A if B’s promise were not enforced and the penalty provided by the statute, a court may decide that the public policy against enforcement of B’s promise does not outweigh the interest in its enforcement and that enforcement of B’s promise is not precluded on grounds of public policy. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 181(c)
A, an unlicensed plumber, agrees to repair plumbing in B’s home, for which B promises to pay A $1,000. A state statute, enacted to prevent the public from being victimized by incompetent plumbers and to protect the public health, requires persons doing plumbing to be licensed on the basis of an examination, the posting of a bond, and the payment of a fee, and makes violation a crime. A had once been licensed but his license had expired the week before because, unknown to him, his clerk had inadvertently forgotten to send in the renewal fee, although the bond had been extended. A does the agreed work. How could B’s promise be enforceable under public policy?
The court may decide that in all the circumstances including A’s ignorance of the fact that he was unlicensed, enforcement of B’s promise is not precluded on grounds of public policy. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 181(c)
A, an unlicensed plumber, agrees to repair plumbing in B’s home, for which B promises to pay A $1,000. A state statute, enacted to prevent the public from being victimized by incompetent plumbers and to protect the public health, requires persons doing plumbing to be licensed on the basis of an examination, the posting of a bond, and the payment of a fee, and makes violation a crime. A does the agreed work. A’s work is defective. Is A’s promise enforceable under public policy?
Since the ordinance was enacted to protect a class of persons to which B belongs against a class to which A belongs, enforcement of A’s promise is not precluded on grounds of public policy and B can recover damages from A for breach of contract. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 181(d)
A sells and delivers to B a shotgun on credit. The sale of firearms is legal, but B plans to use the gun in hunting without a license required by law and A knows this. Enforcement of B’s promise to pay the price is not precluded on grounds of public policy. Is B’s promise enforceable under public policy?
If B planned to use the gun to commit a robbery and A knew this, B’s promise to pay the price would be unenforceable on those grounds. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 182(b)
A, who has lost $1,000 by playing faro, promises B, who regularly makes loans to gamblers, that he will repay B with interest in thirty days if B will make him three loans: $1,000 to cover his losses, $4,000 to recoup them by continuing to play faro, and $2,000 to support his family while he does so. B lends A a total of $7,000, and A loses it all playing faro. A state statute makes playing faro for money a crime. Is A’s promise enforceable under public policy? Is B’s promise enforceable under public policy?
Enforcement of A’s promise to repay the $1,000 to cover his losses and the $2,000 to support his family is not precluded on grounds of public policy. Since A lent him the $4,000 for the purpose of furthering B’s gambling, B’s promise to repay the $4,000 is unenforceable on those grounds. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 182(b)
A sells and delivers to B a quantity of plants. The sale of such plants is legal, but B plans to transport them to a country where quarantine regulations forbid their importation. A not only knows this, but so packs and marks them as to conceal their character in order to aid B’s plan. Is B’s promise enforceable under public policy?
B’s promise to pay the price is unenforceable on grounds of public policy. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 182(b)
A, an unlicensed plumber, agrees to install plumbing in B’s home for which B agrees to pay $1,000 for labor and $500 for materials. A city ordinance, designed to prevent the public from being victimized by incompetent plumbers and to protect the public health, requires persons doing plumbing to be licensed on the basis of an examination, the posting of a bond, and the payment of a fee, and makes violation a misdemeanor. A does the agreed work. Are B’s promises enforceable under public policy?
Even if the court decides that B’s promise to pay $1,000 for labor is unenforceable on grounds of public policy, it may decide that B’s promise to pay $500 for materials is not. If the price for materials is not separately stated, the court may reach the same decision if it can reliably ascertain it from A’s price lists or from market prices. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 183(b)
A promises to deliver fish to B in ten equal monthly installments in return for B’s promise to pay for each installment within 90 days. After three installments have been delivered, B decides to resell the fish as sardines in violation of a statute that makes such mislabelling a misdemeanor, and A agrees to pack them so as to aid B in doing so. Are B’s promises enforceable under public policy?
Even though B’s promise to pay for the last seven installments is unenforceable on grounds of public policy (§ 182) his promise to pay for the first three is not. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 183(b)
- A employs B as head bookkeeper of his retail clothing store under an employment agreement in which B promises not to work in the retail clothing business in the same town for three years after the termination of his employment. B works for A for five years but does not deal directly with customers and acquires no confidential information in his work. Are B’s promises enforceable under public policy?
Although B’s promise is unreasonably in restraint of trade and is unenforceable on grounds of public policy, enforcement of the rest of the employment agreement is not precluded on those grounds. See Illustration 8 to § 188. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 184(a)
A, who is engaged in business as a baker and confectioner, sells the business to B, and as part of the bargain promises not to engage in the business of “baker, confectioner, or other business” within the same town for three years. The provision is fairly bargained for. A’s promise is so broad as to be unreasonably in restraint of trade because A’s business is only that of baker and confectioner. Are A’s promises enforceable under public policy?
Although part of A’s promise is unenforceable on grounds of public policy (§ 188), it is enforceable with respect to the business of baker or confectioner. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 184(b)