Chapter 10. Performance And Non-Performance (231- 260) Flashcards
A, a shipowner, promises to carry B’s cargo on his ship. B promises to pay A the stipulated freight. They exchange these promises in the expectation that there will be a subsequent exchange of those performances. A fails to carry B’s cargo, and B thereupon refuses to pay the freight. Does A have a claim against B?
A’s carrying the cargo and B’s paying the freight are to be exchanged under the exchange of promises. Therefore, under the rule stated in § 237, A has no claim against B. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 231(b)
In return for A’s promise to deliver a machine, B promises to pay A $10,000 within 30 days. They exchange these promises in the expectation that there will be a subsequent exchange of those performances. A fails to deliver the machine, and B thereupon refuses to pay any part of the $10,000. Does A have a claim against B?
A’s delivery of the machine and B’s payment of the $10,000 are to be exchanged under the exchange of promises. Therefore, under the rule stated in § 237, A has no claim against B. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 231(b)
In return for A’s promise to deliver a machine priced at $10,000, B pays A $5,000 as a down payment and promises to pay A the $5,000 balance within 30 days after delivery of the machine. They exchange these promises in the expectation that delivery of the machine will be exchanged, at least in part, for the $5,000 balance and that the $5,000 balance will be exchanged for the machine. A fails to deliver the machine, and B thereupon refuses to pay the $5,000 balance. Does A have a claim against B? B against A?
A’s delivery of the machine and B’s payment of the $5,000 balance within 30 days are to be exchanged under the exchange of promises. Therefore, under the rule stated in § 237, A has no claim against B. B is entitled to restitution of the $5,000 he paid (see §§ 370-77) in addition to his claim against A for damages for breach (§ 243). Restatement 2d of Contracts § 231(c)
A promises to sell and B to buy a food freezer priced at $1,200 to be paid for in monthly installments over an eighteen-month period. A also promises to sell B frozen food at greatly reduced prices, and B promises to buy an initial quantity, deliverable at the same time as the freezer, for $200, with additional quantities to be available in the future at B’s option. Although two separate writings are executed, one entitled “Freezer Contract” and, the other, entitled “Food Contract,” the promises are made as part of the same bargain, and payment for the freezer, for example, is to be exchanged at least in part for the delivery of the food. A tenders the freezer but fails to supply the food although B tenders the $200. B thereupon refuses to take the freezer or to pay anything. Does A have a claim against B?
The performances promised in the two writings, A’s delivery of the freezer and the food and B’s payment for the freezer and the food, are to be exchanged under a single exchange of promises. Therefore, under the rule stated in § 238, A has no claim against B. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 231(d)
A, the owner of a small publishing business, makes a written contract with B, a large publishing company, to sell A’s business to B in exchange for 10,000 shares of B’s stock, having a market price equal to the fair value of A’s business. At the same time, A and B execute a separate writing under which A is to work for B for 5 years, subject to renewal at B’s option, at a salary of $30,000 a year plus a bonus based on sales. B unjustifiably discharges A after one month, and A thereupon refuses to complete the transfer of his business to B. Does A have a claim against B? B against A? What might a court determine?
Whether or not A’s refusal to complete the exchange is a breach depends on whether, under the bargain of the parties, there are two contracts or only one contract. If the court determines that the promise of A to work for B is no part of the consideration for B’s promise to buy A’s business, and that the promise of B to employ A is no part of the consideration for A’s promise to sell his business, there are two separate exchanges of promises. The performance promised in the one writing and the performance promised in the other cannot then be performances to be exchanged under a single exchange of promises. B then has a claim against A for damages for breach of the contract to sell A’s business to B, and A has a claim against B for damages for breach of the contract to employ A (§ 243). If, however, the court determines that each of the promises is at least part of the consideration for the other, there is only one exchange of promises. Under the rule stated in § 232 all of the performances of each party taken collectively are treated as performances to be exchanged under that exchange of promises. Under the rule stated in § 238, B then has no claim against A for damages for A’s refusal to complete the transfer of his business to B, but A has a claim against B for damages because of his unjustifiable discharge of A (§ 243). Restatement 2d of Contracts § 231(d)
A, a wholesaler, promises to sell and B, a retailer, promises to buy goods together with related advertising material, payment to be made within 30 days of delivery. A also promises not to sell similar advertising material to any other retailer in B’s city. A sells similar advertising material to another retailer in B’s city, and B thereupon refuses to take or pay for the goods. Does A have a claim against B?
A’s selling B goods together with advertising material and not selling others similar advertising material, taken collectively, and B’s payment are to be exchanged under the exchange of promises. Therefore, under the rule stated in § 237, if A’s failure of performance is material, A has no claim against B. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 232(a)
A promises to sell to B a lot in a subdivision for $8,000. B promises to pay in four annual installments of $2,000 each, beginning one year after execution of the contract. A promises to begin to make improvements and pave the streets within 60 days and to complete work within a reasonable time and promises to deliver a deed at the time of the final payment. A fails to pave the streets, and B thereupon refuses to pay any installments. Does A have a claim against B?
A’s making improvements, paving streets, and delivering a deed, taken collectively, and B’s paying installments are to be exchanged under the exchange of promises. Therefore, under the rule stated in § 237, if A’s failure of performance is material, A has no claim against B. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 232(a)
A employs B under a five-year employment contract, which contains a valid covenant under which B promises not to engage in the same business in a designated area for two years after the termination of the employment. It expressly provides that “this covenant is independent of any other provision in this agreement.” After B has begun work, A unjustifiably discharges him, and B thereupon engages in business in violation of the covenant. What would a court need to determine for A to have a claim against B?
A’s employing B and B’s working for A are to be exchanged under the exchange of promises. The quoted words indicate an intention that A’s employing B is not to be exchanged for B’s refraining from engaging in the same business. If the court concludes that this intention is clearly manifested, A has a claim against B for damages for breach of his promise not to compete. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 232(a)
A contracts to sell and B to buy a machine, to be delivered immediately, for $10,000. As part of the same bargain, B gives A his negotiable promissory note for $10,000 to A’s order, payable in 90 days, but the note makes no reference to the transaction out of which it arises. A fails to deliver the machine. Does A have a claim against B?
A’s delivering the machine and B’s paying the note are to be exchanged under the exchange of promises. Therefore, under the rule stated in § 237, A has no claim on the note or the contract against B. See Uniform Commercial Code §§ 3-306, 3-408, and 3-307(3). Restatement 2d of Contracts § 232(a)
A, an insurance company, issues to B a group health insurance policy covering B’s employees for one year beginning January 1 in return for B’s promise to pay the premium on February 1. During the month of January A unjustifiably rejects proper claims filed by B’s employees under the policy. B refuses to pay the premium on February 1. Does A have a claim against B? Why?
A’s paying proper claims of B’s employees and B’s paying the premium are to be exchanged under the exchange of promises. Therefore, under the rule stated in § 237, if A’s breach is material, A has no claim against B. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 232(c)
A contracts to sell and B to buy ten identical carloads of coal for $100,000. Assuming no additional terms, is the delivery of the ten carloads divisible?
Delivery by A of all ten carloads is due in a single lot. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 233(a)
A contracts to sell and B to buy ten identical carloads of coal for $100,000. It is known by both A and B that only one carload of coal will be available at a time. Assuming no additional terms, is the delivery of the ten carloads divisible?
A may deliver one carload at a time. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 233(a)
A contracts to sell and B to buy ten identical carloads of coal for $100,000. It is known by both A and B that only one carload of coal will be available at a time. Assuming no additional terms, is the payment for each of the ten carloads divisible?
Payment of $10,000 by B is due at the same time that A delivers each carload of coal. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 233(b)
A promises to sell land to B, delivery of the deed to be on July 1. B promises to pay A $50,000, payment to be made on July 1. Assuming no additional terms, when is the delivery of the deed and payment of the price due?
Delivery of the deed and payment of the price are due simultaneously. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 234(b)
A promises to sell land to B, the deed to be delivered on July 1. B promises to pay A $50,000, no provision being made for the time of payment. Assuming no additional terms, when must performance of the delivery of the deed and payment of the price occur?
Delivery of the deed and payment of the price are due simultaneously. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 234(b)
A promises to sell land to B and B promises to pay A $50,000, no provision being made for the time either of delivery of the deed or of payment. Assuming no additional terms, when is the delivery of the deed and payment of the price due?
Delivery of the deed and payment of the price are due simultaneously. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 234(b)
A promises to sell land to B, delivery of the deed to be on or before July 1. B promises to pay A $50,000, payment to be on or before July 1. Assuming no additional terms, when is the delivery of the deed and payment of the price due?
Delivery of the deed and payment of the price are due simultaneously. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 234(b)
A promises to sell land to B, delivery of the deed to be on or before July 1. B promises to pay A $50,000, payment to be on or before August 1. Assuming no additional terms, when is the delivery of the deed and payment of the price due?
Delivery of the deed and payment of the prices are not due simultaneously. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 234(b)
A promises to sell land to B, delivery of the deed to be four years from the following July 1. B promises to pay A $50,000 in installments of $10,000 on each July 1 for five years. Assuming no additional terms, when is the delivery of the deed and payment of the last installment due?
Delivery of the deed and payment of the last installment are due simultaneously. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 234(c)
A promises to sell land to B, delivery of the deed to be one year from July 1. B promises to pay A $50,000 in installments of $10,000 on each July 1 for five years. Assuming no additional terms, when is the delivery of the deed and payment of the second installment due?
Delivery of the deed and payment of the second installment are due simultaneously. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 234(c)
A promises to sell land to B, delivery of the deed to be four years from the following July 1. B promises to pay A $50,000 in installments of $10,000 on each July 1 for five years. B duly pays the first three installments, but unjustifiably does not pay the fourth until the fifth is due. Is there a breach? When will the delivery of the deed and payment of the forth and fifth installments due?
If B’s failure to pay the fourth installment discharges A’s remaining duties of performance under the rule stated in § 237, A has a claim for damages for total breach (§ 243(1)), and no further performance is due from either party. Otherwise B’s failure to pay the fourth installment gives rise to only a claim for damages for partial breach because of the delay, and, unless circumstances make it appropriate for A to require B to pay the fourth installment first, delivery of the deed and payment of the fourth and fifth installments are then due simultaneously. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 234(d)
A contracts to do the concrete work on a building being constructed by B for $10 a cubic yard. When is payment by B due?
In the absence of language or circumstances indicating the contrary, payment by B is not due until A has finished the concrete work. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 234(f)
A contracts to do the concrete work on a building being constructed by B for $10 a cubic yard. B promises to furnish a bond to secure his payment. No provision is made as to the time for furnishing the bond. When is performance by A due?
No performance by A is due until B has furnished the bond. Although the doing of the concrete work by A requires a period of time and the furnishing of the bond by B does not, the circumstance that the bond is required to secure payment by B indicates that B must furnish the bond first. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 234(f)
A contracts to make alterations in B’s home for $5,000. $500 is to be paid on the signing of the contract, $1,500 on the starting of work, $2,000 on the completion of rough carpentry and rough plumbing, and $1,000 on the completion of the job. When is payment by B due?
Payment by B is due as the work progresses according to the terms of the contract. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 234(f)
A promises to sell land to B, in return for which B promises to pay A $10,000 a year for five years on July 1 of each year. No provision is made as to the time for delivery of a deed. When is delivery of the deed and payment of the last installment due?
Delivery of a deed is not due until July 1 of the fifth year, at which time delivery of the deed and payment of the last installment are due simultaneously. See Illustration 6 of § 234. Rst. 234(f)
A contracts to build a house for B for $50,000 according to specifications furnished by B. A builds the house according to the specifications. Does A have a duty?
A’s duty to build the house is discharged. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 235(a)
A contracts to build a house for B for $50,000 according to specifications furnished by B. A builds the house according to the specifications. A builds the house according to the specifications except for an inadvertent variation in kitchen fixtures which can easily be remedied for $100. Has the contract been breached?
A’s non-performance is a breach. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 235(b)
A contracts with B to manufacture and deliver 100,000 plastic containers for a price of $100,000. The colors of the containers are to be selected by B from among those specified in the contract. B delays in making his selection for an unreasonable time, holding up their manufacture and causing A loss. Has the contract been breached?
B’s delay is a breach. His duty of good faith and fair dealing (§ 205) includes a duty to make his selection within a reasonable time. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 235(b)
A contracts with B to repair B’s building for $20,000, payment to be made “on the satisfaction of C, B’s architect, and the issuance of his certificate.” A makes the repairs but does not ask C for his certificate. B does not pay A. Has the contract been breached?
B’s non-performance is not a breach. It is justified on the ground that performance is not due because of the non-occurrence of a condition. See Illustration 5 to § 227. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 235(b)
A and B make an oral contract, unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds (§ 125), by which A promises to sell and B to buy land for $50,000. Although B tenders the money, A fails to tender a deed and later writes a letter to B which satisfies the Statute of Frauds. Has the contract been breached?
A’s non-performance is a breach and gives rise to a claim for damages, even though the claim is unenforceable until A writes the letter. See Illustration 4 to § 133. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 235(c)
A contracts with B to build a building on B’s land, work to commence on May 1 and to be completed by October 1. On May 10, A has not yet commenced work. What claim, if any, might B have against A? Why?
If the court concludes that A’s breach, although material (§ 241), has not continued for such a length of time that B is discharged (§ 242), B has a claim against A for damages caused by the delay, but this is not a claim for damages based on all of B’s remaining rights to performance. B’s claim is one for damages for partial breach. See § 243. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 236(b)
A contracts with B to build a building on B’s land, work to commence on May 1 and to be completed by October 1. On May 10, A has not yet commenced work. B cancels the contract. What claim, if any, might B have against A? Why?
If the court concludes that A’s breach is not only material but has continued for such a length of time that B is discharged (§ 242), B has a claim against A for damages based on all of his remaining rights to performance. B’s claim is one for damages for total breach. See § 243. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 236(b)
A contracts to build a house for B for $50,000, progress payments to be made monthly in an amount equal to 85% of the price of the work performed during the preceding month, the balance to be paid on the architect’s certificate of satisfactory completion of the house. Without justification B fails to make a $5,000 progress payment. A thereupon stops work on the house and a week goes by. What claim, if any, might B have against A? A against B? Why?
A’s failure to continue the work is not a breach and B has no claim against A. B’s failure to make the progress payment is an uncured material failure of performance which operates as the non-occurrence of a condition of A’s remaining duties of performance under the exchange. If B offers to make the delayed payment and in all the circumstances it is not too late to cure the material breach, A’s duties to continue the work are not discharged. A has a claim against B for damages for partial breach because of the delay. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 237(a)
A contracts to build a house for B for $50,000, progress payments to be made monthly in an amount equal to 85% of the price of the work performed during the preceding month, the balance to be paid on the architect’s certificate of satisfactory completion of the house. B fails to make the progress payment or to give any explanation or assurances for one month. What claim does A have against B? How might B avoid this?
If, in all the circumstances, it is now too late for B to cure his material failure of performance by making the delayed payment, A’s duties to continue the work are discharged. Because B’s failure to make the progress payment was a breach, A also has a claim against B for total breach of contract (§ 243). Restatement 2d of Contracts § 237(a)
A, a theater manager, contracts with B, an actress, for performance by her for a period of six months in a play that A is about to present. B dies during the first week of the performance. What claim, if any, might A have against B’s estate? Why?
A’s remaining duties with respect to the exchange of performances are discharged by B’s uncured material failure of performance. Because B’s failure is justified on the ground of impossibility (§ 262), A has no claim against B’s estate. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 237(a)
A contracts to sell and B to buy at a stated price four parcels of land which A does not own but which the parties expect A to acquire by purchase at a foreclosure sale. A bids on the four parcels at the foreclosure sale, but each time B bids against him and acquires all four for less than the contract price. A does not convey the four parcels to B. What claim, if any, might B have against A? Why?
B has no claim against A. B’s bidding at the sale was a material breach of his duty of good faith and fair dealing (§ 205), which operated as the non-occurrence of a condition of A’s duties and discharged them. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 237(b)
A, a contractor, and B, a subcontractor, make a contract under which B promises to install sewer pipe in a trench which A is to dig and maintain during installation. A unjustifiably so fails to maintain the trench that it fills with water, severely hindering installation. B thereupon stops work and refuses to continue unless the breach is cured. A does not cure his breach. What claim, if any, might A have against B? What will this depend on?
If A’s breach is material (§ 241), it operates as the non-occurrence of a condition of B’s duty to build the sewer, discharging it, and A has no claim against B. If A’s breach is not material, B’s duties are not discharged, and B’s stopping work and refusing to continue is a breach. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 237(b)
A contracts to sell and B to buy on 30 days credit 3,000 tons of iron rails at a stated price. B purchases iron rails heavily from various sources for use in his business, and in consequences A has difficulty in securing 3,000 tons and the market price is substantially increased. A fails to deliver the rails. What claim, if any, might B have against A? Why?
B has a claim against A for breach of contract. B’s purchase of iron rails from other sources for use in his business is not a failure of performance because B is under no duty to refrain from purchasing for that purpose. A’s failure to deliver the rails is therefore a breach. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 237(b)
A contracts to sell and B to buy on 30 days credit 3,000 tons of iron rails at a stated price. B maliciously buys iron rails heavily from various sources in order to prevent A from performing his contract with B. What claim, if any, does B have against A? Does A have a duty?
B has no claim against A. B’s malicious purchase of iron rails from other sources is material breach of his duty of good faith and fair dealing (§ 204), which operates as the non-occurrence of a condition of A’s duty to deliver the rails, discharging it. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 237(b)
A and B make an employment contract. After the service has begun, A, the employee, commits a material breach of his duty to give efficient service that would justify B in discharging him. B is not aware of this but discharges A for an inadequate reason. What claim, if any, does B have against A or A against B?
A has no claim against B for discharging him. B has a claim against A for damages for total breach (§ 243) based on B’s loss due to A’s failure to give efficient service up to the time of discharge, but not for damages based on the loss of A’s services after that time, because that loss was caused by B’s discharge of A and not by A’s failure to give efficient service. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 237(c)
A contracts to sell and B to buy goods on 30 days credit. A delivers defective goods, which B rejects in ignorance of their defects. What claim, if any, might B have against A? A against B? Why?
A has no claim against B. B has a claim against A for total breach (§ 243), but can recover nominal damages only since the unavailability of the goods to B was caused by B’s rejection and not by their defects. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 237(c)
A contracts to sell and B to buy goods on 30 days credit. A delivers defective goods, which B rejects in ignorance of their defects. When B rejects the goods he states an insufficient reason, which induces a failure by A to cure the defects in the goods. May B, nonetheless, rely on the defects to justify his rejection?
B is precluded from relying on the defects to justify his rejection, not because of his ignorance itself, but because his giving of an insufficient reason for rejection excused the non-occurrence of the condition of his duty to take and pay for the goods (§ 248. Uniform Commercial Code § 2-605). Restatement 2d of Contracts § 237(d)
A contracts to build a house for B, for which B promises to pay $50,000 in monthly progress payments equal to 85% of the value of the work with the balance to be paid on completion. When A completes construction, B refuses to pay the $7,500 balance claiming that there are defects that amount to an uncured material breach. What claim, if any, might A have against B? A against B? Why?
If the breach is material, A’s performance is not substantial and he has no claim under the contract against B, although he may have a claim in restitution (§ 374). If the breach is not material, A’s performance is said to be substantial, he has a claim under the contract against B for $7,500, and B has a claim against A for damages because of the defects. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 237(d)
A contracts to build a building for B. B delays making the site available to A, giving A a claim against B for damages for partial breach. A then commits a material breach and B properly cancels the contract. What claim, if any, might B have against A? A against B? Why?
B has a claim against A for damages for total breach, but A still has a claim against B for damages for partial breach. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 237(e)
A contracts to sell and B to buy a machine for $10,000, delivery of the machine and payment of the price to be made at a stated place on July 1. On July 1 both parties are present at that place, but A neither delivers nor offers to deliver the machine and B neither pays nor offers to pay the price. What claim, if any, might B have against A? A against B? Why?
A has no claim against B, and B has no claim against A. See Uniform Commercial Code §§ 2-507(1) and 2-511(1). If, however, B had committed a material breach by failing to go to the stated place, A would have had a claim against B for damages for total breach. See §§ 237, 243. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 238(a)
A contracts to sell and B to buy a machine for $10,000, delivery of the machine and payment of the price to be made at a stated place on July 1. On July 1 both parties are present at that place, but A neither delivers nor offers to deliver the machine and B neither pays nor offers to pay the price. On July 2, B, with manifested present ability to do so, offers to pay the price if A simultaneously delivers the machine, but A refuses to deliver the machine. What claim, if any, might B have against A? Why?
If the delay of one day does not exceed the time after which A is discharged (§ 242), A’s refusal is a breach. If it exceeds that time, B has no claim against A. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 238(a)
A contracts to sell and B to buy land for $50,000. The land is to be conveyed free of liens and encumbrances, but B knows that it is subject to a $30,000 mortgage held by C which A expects to satisfy out of the $50,000 purchase price. A, in the presence of B and C, makes a conditional offer of a deed of the property subject to the mortgage, and both A and C present documents that are legally sufficient to satisfy the mortgage debt to be delivered immediately on payment of the price by B. B thereupon refuses to pay the price. What claim, if any, does A have against B? Why?
In view of the circumstances at the time the contract was made, A’s offer is sufficient, and A has a claim against B for damages for total breach of contract. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 238(b)
A contracts to sell and B to buy a machine for $10,000, delivery of the machine and payment of the price to be made at a stated place on July 1. On July 1, A puts the machine at B’s disposition and requests that he pay for it. B refuses to pay and A, after attempting unsuccessfully to resell the machine, brings an action for the price under Uniform Commercial Code § 2-709. What must A do to for a court to award judgment against B for the full price?
A court will award judgment for the full price only if A holds the machine for the buyer during the action. See Uniform Commercial Code § 2-709(2). Restatement 2d of Contracts § 238(c)
A promises to sell real estate to B, delivery of the deed to be four years from July 1. B promises to pay $50,000 in installments of $10,000 on each July 1 for five years. B duly pays the first three installments but does not pay the fourth, and A brings an action to recover it. What must A do to for a court to award judgment against B?
A has judgment but the judgment is not collected until after the July 1 when the payment of the fifth installment and the delivery are due. The court will restrain collection of the judgment until A makes an offer to transfer the real estate conditional on being paid the amount of the judgment and also the fifth installment of the price. See Illustration 8 to § 234 and Illustration 2 to § 358. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 238(c)
A contracts to sell and B to buy a house for $50,000. The contract contains the provision, “This contract is conditional on approval by X Bank of B’s pending mortgage application.” Under what condition does performance by B become due? By A?
Approval by X Bank is a condition of B’s duty, and therefore if X Bank does not approve B’s application, performance by B will not become due, even if A makes an offer of a deed. But it is not a condition of A’s duty and therefore performance by A will become due if, although X Bank does not approve B’s application, B makes an offer to pay $50,000. See Illustration 4 to § 226. Under § 251, performance by A will not become due if B does not pay or offer to pay $50,000 because A did not assume the risk that he would nonetheless have to perform. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 239(a)
A, a general contractor, contracts with B, a subcontractor, for the plumbing work on a construction project. B is to receive $100,000, payable monthly as the work progresses “on condition that Owner shall have paid Contractor therefor.” B works for three months and makes monthly requests for payment of a total of $60,000 from A. When A does not pay B because the owner has not paid A for the plumbing work, B stops work and a month later notifies A that he cancels the contract. How could a court find B’s cancellation to be breach?
If the court determines, in the light of the quoted language and other circumstances, that B assumed the risk that he would have to perform even if A did not pay him on the ground that the owner did not pay A, A’s justifiable non-payment on that ground does not operate as a failure to perform under § 237 and therefore B’s cancellation is a breach. Compare Illustration 1 to § 227 and Illustration 2 to § 237. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 239(b)
A, a general contractor, contracts with B, a subcontractor, for the plumbing work on a construction project. B is to receive $100,000, payable monthly as the work progresses “on condition that Owner shall have paid Contractor therefor.” B works for three months and makes monthly requests for payment of a total of $60,000 from A. A unjustifiably refuses to pay B, although the owner has paid A for the plumbing work. B stops work and a month later notifies A that he cancels the contract. How could a court find B’s cancellation not to be breach?
Although B assumed the risk that he would have to perform even if A did not pay on the ground that the owner did not pay A, A’s non-payment is not justified on that ground and therefore operates as a failure to perform under § 237. If a court concludes that the failure is material and that B’s cancellation came when it was too late for A to cure it, B’s cancellation is not a breach. Compare Illustration 1 to § 227 and Illustration 2 to § 237. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 239(b)
A contracts to sell and B to buy a quantity of dressed hogs and a quantity of live hogs at stated prices for each quantity. A is to deliver the dressed hogs first and the live hogs 15 days later, and B is to pay for each delivery within 30 days after it is made. A delivers the dressed hogs, but unjustifiably refuses to deliver the live ones. Can A still recover the stated price for the dressed hogs? What claim, if any, might B have against A?
If a court finds that delivery of the dressed hogs and payment of the price stated for them are agreed equivalents, A can recover the stated price for the dressed hogs under the contract. B then has a claim against A for damages for his failure to deliver the live hogs. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 240(b)
A contracts to sell and B to buy a quantity of dressed hogs and a quantity of live hogs at stated prices for each quantity. A is to deliver the dressed hogs first and the live hogs 15 days later, and B is to pay for each delivery within 30 days after it is made. A has no right to payment for either the dressed or the live hogs until 30 days after delivery of the live ones, but A unjustifiably refuses to deliver the live hogs until B pays for the dressed ones. Can A still recover the stated price for the dressed hogs? What claim, if any, might B have against A?
If a court finds that delivery of the dressed hogs and the price stated for them are agreed equivalents, A can recover the stated price for the dressed hogs under the contract. See § 227(1). B then has a claim against A for damages for his failure to deliver the live hogs. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 240(b)
A contracts to sell and B to buy a quantity of dressed hogs and a quantity of live hogs at stated prices for each quantity. A is to deliver the dressed hogs first and the live hogs 15 days later, and B is to pay for each delivery within 30 days after it is made. Before A delivers the dressed hogs, he repudiates the contract by stating that he will not deliver the live ones. B then refuses to accept the dressed hogs. Can A still recover the stated price for the dressed hogs? What claim, if any, does B have against A? A against B?
Even if a court finds that delivery of the dressed hogs and payment of the price stated for them are agreed equivalents, A has no claim against B. B has a claim against A for damages for total breach of contract (§ 253). Restatement 2d of Contracts § 240(b)
A contracts with B to work for one year as a real estate salesman and to devote his full time to this work. A is to receive half of the real estate commission on all sales that he effects. A devotes full time to this work for ten months, but unjustifiably devotes only part time for the last two months. Can A still recover the unpaid commissions on the final two months? What claim, if any, might B have against A?
A court may apportion the unpaid commissions earned by A into those earned during the first ten months and those earned under the last two months according to the formula stated in the contract and, if it finds that working full time for ten months and the commissions on the sales over those months are agreed equivalents, A can recover the unpaid commissions for those months under the contract. B then has a claim against A for damages for his failure to devote full time during the last two months. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 240(d)
A contracts with B to furnish the rights to 23 motion pictures to be selected by B from a much larger list over a period of five years. The contract states a total price of $23,000, but does not break it down into $1,000 for each picture. A furnishes B with the rights to only 14 pictures, which B shows, and then A unjustifiably refuses to furnish the rights to 9 others. Can A still recover the stated price for each picture? What claim, if any, might B have against A?
A court may apportion the price as $1,000 for each picture and, if it finds that the furnishing of rights to 14 pictures and the payment of $14,000 are agreed equivalents, A can recover that amount under the contract. B has a claim for damages against A for his failure to furnish the rights to the 9 other pictures. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 240(d)
A contracts with B to do specified work on B’s subdivision. A is to do the excavation and grading of lots and streets for a lump sum price of $75,000, payable on completion of that part of the work. A is then to make street improvements, including the installation of curbs and gutters, for stated unit prices, payable on completion of that part of the work. A is to provide separate performance bonds for each part. A does the excavation and grading of lots and streets but then unjustifiably refuses to make street improvements. B refuses to pay A for excavation and grading, although he can easily have the street improvements made by another contractor. The excavation and grading of lots and streets and the payment of $75,000 are agreed equivalents. What claim, if any, does A have against B or B have against A?
A has a claim against B for $75,000 under the contract for the excavation and grading. B has a claim for damages against A for his unjustified failure to make street improvements. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 240(e)
A contracts to build a house for B for $50,000, progress payments to be made monthly in an amount equal to 85% of the price of the work performed during the preceding month, the balance to be paid on the architect’s certificate of satisfactory completion of the house. A unjustifiably stops work at the end of a month before the work is substantially completed and sues for the progress payment for that month. Can A recover anything for the performance under contract? What claim, if any, does A have against B or B have against A?
The performance during that month and the corresponding progress payment are not agreed equivalents. A can recover nothing under the contract for that performance. B has a claim against A for damages for breach. Whether A has a claim against B in restitution is determined under the rules stated in §§ 370-77. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 240(e)
A contracts with B to drive 10,000 logs from various points down a river to B’s boom at one cent per log mile. Because of a flood, A drives only 5,763 logs an average distance of 100 miles each to B’s boom, and leaves the other 4,237 logs on the banks part of the way to B’s boom. B expects to resell the logs and can resell the 5,763 at the same unit price as the entire 10,000. Can A recover anything for the performance under contract? What claim, if any, might A have against B or B have against A?
The driving of the logs to B’s boom and the corresponding price at the contract rate are agreed equivalents, but the driving of logs part way and the corresponding price at the contract rate are not. A can recover $5,763 under the contract for the 5,763 logs that he has driven to B’s boom, but can recover nothing for the remaining 4,237 logs that he has driven only part of the way. If A’s failure to drive the remaining logs to B’s boom is unjustified, it is a breach, and B has a claim against A for damages. Whether A’s failure is justified on the ground of impracticability of performance is determined under the rules stated in §§ 261 and 263. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 240(e)
The United States contracts with A under an “Industrial Preparedness Contract” for the production in volume of an electronic device. The work is to be done in three steps. Step I requires A to draw up plans and make a pilot run. Step II requires A to acquire equipment for production. Step III, to be taken only in case of national emergency and after receipt of an order from the United States, requires volume production and delivery in accordance with a stated schedule. A is required to maintain a state of readiness for this step over a six-year period. Specified payments are to be made on the completion of Steps I and II and against deliveries during Step III. A completes Steps I and II and, after having been paid $150,000, repudiates the contract when $50,000 is still unpaid on Step II. A sues for that unpaid balance of $50,000. Can A recover anything for the performance under contract? What claim, if any, does A have against the United States or the United States have against A?
The completion of Steps I and II and the payment of the amounts specified in the contract for those steps are not agreed equivalents. A has no claim against the United States for that performance. The United States has a claim against A for damages for breach. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 240(e)
A contracts with B to construct and maintain ten signs advertising B’s motel for $1,600 a year, $100 each for eight smaller signs and $400 each for two larger signs. The signs are of a special design not easily obtainable elsewhere. A contracts with B to construct and maintain ten signs advertising B’s motel for $1,600 a year, $100 each for eight smaller signs and $400 each for two larger signs. A’s failure to construct the remaining two signs will not appreciably diminish the effect of the other eight. Can A recover anything for the performance under contract? What claim, if any, does B have against A?
The construction and maintenance of the eight signs and the corresponding price at the contract rate are agreed equivalents. A can recover $1,100 a year under the contract for the signs that he constructs and maintains. B has a claim against A for damages for breach. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 240(e)
A contracts with B to construct and maintain ten signs advertising B’s motel for $1,600 a year, $100 each for eight smaller signs and $400 each for two larger signs. The signs are part of a series beginning “10 more miles to B’s place,” so that the failure to construct the remaining two will appreciably diminish the effect of the other eight. A contracts with B to construct and maintain ten signs advertising B’s motel for $1,600 a year, $100 each for eight smaller signs and $400 each for two larger signs. Can A recover anything for the performance under contract? What claim, if any, might A have against B or B have against A?
The construction and maintenance of each sign and the corresponding price at the contract rate are not agreed equivalents. A can recover nothing under the contract for the signs that he constructs and maintains. B has a claim against A for damages for breach. Whether A has a claim against B in restitution is determined under the rules stated in §§ 370-77. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 240(e)
A, a subcontractor, contracts to do excavation and earth moving on a housing subdivision project for B, the owner and general contractor, and to do all work “in a workmanlike manner.” B is to make monthly progress payments for the work performed during the preceding month less a retainer of ten percent. A negligently damages a building with his bulldozer causing serious damage and denies any liability for B’s loss. When B refuses to make further progress payments until A repairs the damage or admits liability, A notifies B that he cancels the contract. What claim, if any, might A have against B or B have against A?
If the court determines that A’s breach is material, A has no claim against B. B has a claim against A for damages for breach of contract. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 241(a)
A contracts with B to do specified work on B’s subdivision. A is to do the excavation and grading of lots and streets for a lump sum price of $75,000, payable on completion of that part of the work. A is then to make street improvements, including the installation of curbs and gutters, for stated unit prices, payable on completion of that part of the work. A is to provide separate performance bonds for each part. A completes the part concerned with the excavation and grading of lots and streets but fails in a minor respect to comply with the specifications and unjustifiably refuses to make street improvements. B refuses to pay A for excavation and grading, although he can easily have the street improvements made by another contractor. What claim, if any, might A have against B or B have against A?
If a court determines that the failure is not material, A has a claim against B for $75,000 under the contract for the excavation and grading. B has a claim for damages against A for his failure fully to perform as to excavation and grading and also for his unjustified refusal to make street improvements. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 241(a)
A contracts to sell and B to buy 300 crates of Australian onions, shipment to be from Australia in March. A has 300 crates ready for shipment in March, but government requisitions prevent him from loading more than 240 crates on the only ship available in March. B refuses to accept or pay for the onions when they are tendered. What claim, if any, might A have against B or B have against A?
Under the circumstances stated in Subsections (a) and (c) of § 241, A’s failure is material and A has no claim against B. If A’s failure is unjustified, B has a claim against A for damages for partial breach because of the delay even if A cures his failure, and has a claim against A for damages for total breach if A does not cure his failure (§ 243). Restatement 2d of Contracts § 241(d)
A promises to sell to B a lot in a subdivision for $8,000. B promises to pay in four annual installments of $2,000 each, beginning one year after execution of the contract. A promises to begin to make improvements and pave the streets within 60 days and to complete work within a reasonable time and promises to deliver a deed at the time of the final payment. A fails to pave the streets, and B thereupon refuses to pay any installments. B can have the part of the street in front of his own lot paved for $500, but this will not give him the expected access to his lot because the rest of the street is not paved. What claim, if any, might A have against B or B have against A?
Under the circumstances stated in Subsections (a), (b), and (c) of § 241, the failure of performance is material and A has no claim against B. If A’s failure is unjustified, B has a claim against A for damages for partial breach because of the delay even if A cures his failure, and has a claim against A for damages for total breach if A does not cure his failure (§ 243). Restatement 2d of Contracts § 241(d)