Chapter 4. Formation Of Contracts—Consideration (71-109) Flashcards
A owes B $500 on a negotiable note. C, an indorser of the note, was duly charged at maturity. B’s rights against A and C are barred by the statute of limitations. A promises C to pay B the amount of the note. Is this promise binding?
The promise is binding for the benefit of B. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 92(b)
A offers to buy a book owned by B and to pay B $10 in exchange therefor. B accepts the offer and delivers the book to A. Is there consideration?
The transfer and delivery of the book constitute a performance and are consideration for A’s promise. See Uniform Commercial Code § § 2-106, 2-301. This is so even though A at the time he makes the offer secretly intends to pay B $10 whether or not he gets the book, or even though B at the time he accepts secretly intends not to collect the $10. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 71(b)
A receives a gift from B of a book worth $10. Subsequently A promises to pay B the value of the book. Is there consideration?
There is no consideration for A’s promise. This is so even though B at the time he makes the gift secretly hopes that A will pay him for it. As to the enforcement of such promises, see § 86. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 71(b)
A promises to make a gift of $10 to B. In reliance on the promise B buys a book from C and promises to pay C $10 for it. Is there consideration?
There is no consideration for A’s promise. As to the enforcement of such promises, see § 90. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 71(b)
A desires to make a binding promise to give $1000 to his son B. Being advised that a gratuitous promise is not binding, A writes out and signs a false recital that B has sold him a car for $1000 and a promise to pay that amount. Is there consideration?
There is no consideration for A’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 71(b)
A desires to make a binding promise to give $1000 to his son B. Being advised that a gratuitous promise is not binding, A offers to buy from B for $1000 a book worth less than $1. B accepts the offer knowing that the purchase of the book is a mere pretense. Is there consideration?
There is no consideration for A’s promise to pay $1000. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 71(b)
A offers to buy a book owned by B and to pay B $10 in exchange therefor. Is there consideration?
B’s transfer and delivery of the book are consideration for A’s promise even though both parties know that such books regularly sell for $5 and that part of A’s motive in making the offer is to make a gift to B. See § § 79, 81. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 71(c)
A owns land worth $10,000 which is subject to a mortgage to secure a debt of $5,000. A promises to make a gift of the land to his son B and to pay off the mortgage, and later gives B a deed subject to the mortgage. Is there consideration?
B’s acceptance of the deed is not consideration for A’s promise to pay the mortgage debt. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 71(c)
A and B agree that A will advance $1000 to B as a gratuitous loan. Is there consideration?
B’s promise to accept the loan is not consideration for A’s promise to make it. But the loan when made is consideration for B’s promise to repay. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 71(c)
A promises B, his nephew aged 16, that A will pay B $1000 when B becomes 21 if B does not smoke before then. Is there consideration?
B’s forbearance to smoke is a performance and––if bargained for––is consideration for A’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 71(d)
A says to B, the owner of a garage, “I will pay you $100 if you will make my car run properly.” Is there consideration?
The production of this result is consideration for A’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 71(d)
A has B’s horse in his possession. B writes to A, “If you will promise me $100 for the horse, he is yours.” A promptly replies making the requested promise. The property in the horse at once passes to A. Is there consideration?
The change in ownership is consideration for A’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 71(d)
A promises to pay B $1,000 if B will make an offer to C to sell C certain land for $25,000 and will leave the offer open for 24 hours. B makes the requested offer and forbears to revoke it for 24 hours, but C does not accept. Is there consideration?
The creation of a power of acceptance in C is consideration for A’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 71(d)
A mails a written order to B, offering to buy specified machinery on specified terms. The order provides “Ship at once.” How could consideration be manifested?
B’s prompt shipment or promise to ship is consideration for A’s promise to pay the price. See § 32. Uniform Commercial Code § 2-206( 1)( b). Restatement 2d of Contracts § 71(d)
A, at C’s request and in exchange for $1 paid by C, promises B to give him a book. Is there consideration?
The payment is consideration for A’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 71(e)
A promises B to pay B $1, in exchange for C’s promise to A to give A a book. Is there consideration?
The promises are consideration for one another. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 71(e)
A promises to pay $1,000 to B, a bank, in exchange for the delivery of a car by C to A’s son D. How could consideration be manifested?
The delivery of the car is consideration for A’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 71(e)
A offers a reward to whoever produces evidence leading to the arrest and conviction of the murderer of B. C produces such evidence in the performance of his duty as a police officer. Is there consideration?
C’s performance is not consideration for A’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 73(b)
A offers a reward to whoever produces evidence leading to the arrest and conviction of the murderer of B. C produces such evidence in the performance of his duty as a police officer. C’s duties as a police officer are limited to crimes committed in a particular State, and while on vacation he gathers evidence as to a crime committed elsewhere. Is there consideration?
C’s performance is consideration for the promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 73(b)
In a State where contracts between husband and wife are enforced and spouses are under a duty not to leave without just cause, A’s wife, B, leaves him without just cause. A promises to pay B $1,000 if she will return. Induced thereby, B returns. Is there consideration?
Her return is not consideration. Compare § § 175-77, 190. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 73(b)
A, an architect, agrees with B to superintend a construction project for a fixed fee. During the course of the project, without excuse, A takes away his plans and refuses to continue, and B promises him an extra fee if A will resume work. Is A’s resumption of work consideration?
A’s resumption of work is not consideration for B’s promise of an extra fee. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 73(c)
A files a claim for total disability under an accident insurance policy written by B. Without investigation, discussion or dispute, B pays A the lesser amount which would be payable for partial disability, and A signs a receipt for “full payment” of the claim. Is there consideration?
The payment is not consideration for A’s promise to accept it in full satisfaction of his claim for total disability. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 73(c)
A, being insolvent and contemplating bankruptcy, offers B $30 in full settlement of a debt of $100. B dissuades A from going into bankruptcy, accepts the offer, receives the money, and closes the account. Is there consideration?
A’s forbearance to seek a discharge in bankruptcy is consideration for B’s promise not to seek further payment. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 73(c)
A owes B a liquidated sum. How could consideration be manifested?
Any payment by A at an earlier time, or in a different medium from that required by the duty, is consideration for B’s promise to accept it in full satisfaction if the difference in performance is part of what is requested and given in exchange for the promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 73(c)
A owes B a matured liquidated debt bearing interest. They agree to extend the debt for two years at a lower interest rate. If A manages to get enough money to pay off the debt, can A terminate the interest?
Mutual promises to extend the debt for a year even at a lower rate of interest are binding. By such an agreement A gives up the right to terminate the running of interest by paying the debt. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 73(c)
A and B are engaged to be married. In an antenuptial agreement C, A’s father, promises B that C will pay an annuity to A, and A and B marry in reliance on the promise. Is there consideration?
The marriage is consideration for C’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 73(d)
A and her husband B are employed as domestic servants of C. B having become ill, C employs A to care for B in the home of A and B. Is there consideration?
A’s care for B is consideration for C’s promise to pay wages to A. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 73(d)
A contracts with B to install heating units in houses being built by B for C. B becomes insolvent and discontinues work, and C promises to pay A if A completes the installation in accordance with the contract between A and B. How would consideration be manifested?
A’s performance is consideration for C’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 73(d)
A is employed to drive B’s horse in a race. C owns the dam of B’s horse and is entitled to a prize if B’s horse wins the race. C promises A a bonus if he wins the race. How could consideration be manifested by A? Does B have any claim?
A’s driving in the race is consideration for C’s promise, but B may be entitled to the bonus. See Restatement, Second, Agency § § 313, 388. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 73(d)
A, an infant, promises B to pay B $50 for a set of books which A does not need. B delivers the books. A becomes of age and threatens to rescind the bargain, as the law permits him to do. B promises A that if A will pay the $50 as originally agreed, B will give A another book. A, induced thereby, pays the $50. Is there consideration?
The payment is consideration. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 73(e)
A sells goods to B, who becomes indebted therefor in the sum of $100. The Statute of Limitations bars any remedy of A to recover the debt. A promises B that if B will pay the debt, A will give B a specified book. B pays the debt. Is there consideration?
The payment is consideration. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 73(e)
A, a shipowner, has a legal duty to provide maintenance and cure for B, a seaman. B honestly but unreasonably claims that adequate care is not available in a free public hospital and that he is entitled to treatment by a private physician. Is there consideration?
B’s forbearance to press this claim is consideration for A’s promise to be responsible for the consequences of any improper treatment in the public hospital. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 74(b)
A, knowing that he has no legal basis for complaint, frequently complains to B, his father, that B has made more gifts to B’s other children than to A. B promises that if A will cease complaining, B will forgive a debt owed by A to B. A stops complaining. Is there consideration?
A’s forbearance to assert his claim of discrimination is not consideration for B’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 74(b)
A, knowing that B is a married man, cohabits with him for several years. During that time B promises to marry A as soon as he is divorced. After the cohabitation ceases, A surrenders all her claims on account of the promise to marry in consideration of B’s promise to pay her $1000 a month during her life. Is there consideration?
Under applicable state law A has no valid claim. If it is found that A knew there was no valid claim, there is no consideration for B’s promise of payment. Compare § § 189-90. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 74(b)
A, a real estate broker, is entitled to a commission for selling B’s land, amounting to five per cent or $1,500. B claims in good faith that he owes only one per cent or $300, and offers to pay that amount in full settlement of the claim for commission. A accepts the offer. How would consideration be manifested?
The payment is consideration for B’s promise to surrender his entire claim. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 74(c)
A owes B at least $4,280 on a logging contract. Additional items in the account are unliquidated, and some of them are the subject of honest dispute. A disputes B’s right to all above $4,280 on grounds he knows to be untrue, and offers $4,000 in full settlement. If A pays, is there consideration?
A’s payment of $4,000 is not consideration for B’s promise to surrender his entire claim. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 74(c)
A contracts to sell and deliver a lot of goods to B. On delivery B accepts a commercial unit priced at $30 and rejects the rest, priced at $50. See Uniform Commercial Code § 2-601. B claims in good faith but erroneously that the rejected goods are defective. A promises to surrender any claim based on the rejection if B pays the $30. How would consideration be manifested?
B’s payment is consideration for A’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 74(c)
A stops payment on a check for $200 drawn on his account in the B bank, but the bank pays the check and charges his account, leaving a balance of $800. There is an honest dispute as to the propriety of the charge, and the bank refuses to pay any part of the $800 until the dispute is settled. To obtain the money, A promises to make no further claim. If the bank pays the $800, would that be consideration?
Payment of the $800 by the bank is not consideration for the promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 74(c)
A owes B $120. Without requesting B to forbear suit, C promises B in April that if A does not pay by October 1 C will pay $100. B waits until October. Is there consideration?
B’s forbearance to sue until October is not consideration for C’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 74(d)
A owes B a debt secured by mortgage, and B begins foreclosure proceedings. C requests B to forbear and promises to pay the debt. How would consideration be manifested?
B’s forbearance for a reasonable time is consideration for C’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 74(d)
A owns land and desires to mortgage it. He is informed that his title may be defective by reason of a possible interest in B. B says that he has no claim and has previously given a deed to the land to A’s grantor. A promises to pay $50 for a new quit-claim deed. How would consideration be manifested?
B’s execution and delivery of such a deed is consideration for A’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 74(e)
A promises to pay a debt to B, or to perform an existing contractual duty to B, or to perform his duty as a public official. The legal duty is neither doubtful nor the subject of honest dispute, but A would not have fulfilled the duty but for B’s return promise. Is there consideration?
A’s promise is not consideration for B’s return promise. Compare § 73. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 75(c)
A promises B to surrender or to forbear suit upon a claim either against B or against C. A knows the claim is invalid. Is there consideration?
A’s promise is not consideration for a return promise by B. Compare § 74. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 75(c)
While A’s property is under guardianship by reason of an adjudication of mental illness, A makes an agreement with B in which B makes a promise. Is there a contract?
B’s promise is not a contract, whether the consideration consists of a promise by A or performance by A. Compare § 13. Restatement of Restitution § 139. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 75(d)
A promises to forbear suit against B in exchange for B’s promise to pay a liquidated and undisputed debt to A. Is this binding?
A’s promise is not binding because B’s promise is not consideration under § 73, but A’s promise is nevertheless consideration for B’s. Moreover, B’s promise would be enforceable without consideration under § 82. On either basis, B’s promise is conditional on A’s forbearance and can be enforced only if the condition is met. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 75(d)
A, a married man , and B, an unmarried woman, make mutual promises to marry. B neither knows nor has reason to know that A is married. Is there consideration?
B’s promise is consideration and B may recover damages from A for breach of his promise though B would have a defense to a similar action by A. See § 180. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 75(d)
A promises B $100 in return for B’s promise to cut timber on land upon which A is a trespasser. B neither knows nor has reason to know that A is not privileged to cut the timber. Is there consideration?
B’s promise is consideration and B may recover damages from A for breach of his promise though B would have a defense to a similar action by A. See Illustration 2 to § 180. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 75(d)
A promises B to pay him $5,000 if B’s ship now at sea has already been lost, knowing that the ship has not been lost. Is there consideration?
A’s promise is illusory and is not consideration for a return promise. 2. The facts being otherwise as stated in Illustration 1, A makes the promise not knowing whether the ship has been lost or not. A’s promise is consideration even though A has reason to know that the ship has not been lost. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 76(b)
A sells to B a tract of land said to contain 500 acres. Later A and B agree to have the land surveyed. A promises to pay B $16 for each acre of deficiency. B promises to pay A $16 for each acre of excess. Is there consideration?
A’s promise is consideration for B’s promise, and B’s promise is consideration for A’s. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 76(b)
A promises to sell and B to buy goods if A’s employees do not strike before the time for delivery. Is there consideration?
The promises are consideration for each other. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 76(c)
A promises to convey to B immediately a patent owned by A. B promises to pay A $10,000 when pending litigation is terminated, if the patent is not held invalid. Is there consideration?
B’s promise is consideration for A’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 76(c)
A promises B to pay him $5000 if his house burns within a year. Is there consideration?
This is consideration for a return promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 76(c)
A promises B to pay him $5000 if A enters a competing business within three years. Is there consideration?
This is consideration for a return promise, since forbearance to compete would be consideration. See § 77. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 76(d)
A promises B that, “subject to purchase” of a certain ship, he will charter it to B, and B promises to accept the charter. Is there consideration?
A’s promise is consideration for B’s. A’s forbearance to buy the ship could have been consideration for a different promise, such as a promise to pay money. See § 77. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 76(d)
A offers to deliver to B at $2 a bushel as many bushels of wheat, not exceeding 5,000, as B may choose to order within the next 30 days. B accepts, agreeing to buy at that price as much as he shall order from A within that time. Is B’s acceptance consideration?
B’s acceptance involves no promise by him, and is not consideration. Compare § § 31, 34. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 77(a)
A promises B to act as B’s agent for three years from a future date on certain terms. B agrees that A may so act, but reserves the power to terminate the agreement at any time. Is there consideration?
B’s agreement is not consideration, since it involves no promise by him. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 77(a)
A offers to deliver to B at $2 a bushel as many bushels of wheat, not exceeding 5,000, as B may choose to order within the next 30 days, if B will promise to order at least 1,000 bushels within that time. B accepts. Is there consideration?
B’s promise is consideration since it reserves only a limited option and cannot be performed without doing something which would be consideration if it alone were bargained for. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 77(b)
A agrees to sell and B to buy between 400 and 600 tons of fertilizer in installments as ordered by B, A reserving the right to terminate the agreement at any time without notice. Is there consideration?
B’s promise is without consideration. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 77(b)
A promises B to act as B’s agent for three years on certain terms, starting immediately. B agrees that A may so act, but reserves the power to terminate the agreement on 30 days notice. Is there consideration?
B’s agreement is consideration, since he promises to continue the agency for at least 30 days. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 77(b)
A owes B an undisputed debt of $5,000 payable in five years. A makes a subsequent promise that he will either pay $4,000 at the end of the first year or pay the debt at maturity. in return B promises to accept the $4,000, if paid at the end of the first year, in full satisfaction of the debt. Is there consideration?
A’s subsequent promise is not consideration for B’s return promise, since the alternative of performing his legal duty is not consideration. See § § 73, 75. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 77(b)
A orders goods from B for shipment within three months, reserving the right to cancel the order before shipment. B has the goods in stock and accepts the order. Is there consideration?
A’s promise to pay for the goods is consideration for B’s promise to ship, since B can prevent cancellation by shipping immediately. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 77(c)
A promises to sell his output or buy his requirements of a specified type of goods from B on specified terms. Is there consideration?
A’s promise is consideration for a return promise by B. A must operate his plant or conduct his business in good faith and according to commercial standards of fair dealing in the trade so that his output or requirements will approximate a reasonably foreseeable figure. See Comment 2 to Uniform Commercial Code § 2-306. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 77(d)
A promises to pay B half of any profits he derives from the sale of goods manufactured by B. in return B promises that A shall have the exclusive right to market such goods. Is there consideration?
The promises are consideration for each other, since the agreement for exclusive dealing imposes an obligation on A to use best efforts to promote sale of the goods and on B to use best efforts to supply them. See Uniform Commercial Code § 2-306(2). Restatement 2d of Contracts § 77(d)
A owes B a matured liquidated debt bearing interest. In an agreement to extend the debt for a year at a lower rate of interest, B reserves the right to accelerate payment “at will,” but under Uniform Commercial Code § 1-208, B may accelerate payment only if he in good faith believes that the prospect of payment is impaired. Is there consideration?
B’s surrender of the unconditional right to demand immediate payment is consideration. Compare Illustration 8 to § 73. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 77(d)
A is under a contractual duty to deliver to B a described automobile. Because it is doubtful whether such a car will be available at the agreed time, A promises that if he cannot obtain it he will deliver a described substitute. B agrees to accept the substitute if delivered. Is there consideration?
A’s promise is consideration. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 77(d)
A makes a promise in exchange for a return promise by B. A is an infant. B makes a fraudulent promise. Is there consideration?
The fact that the contract is voidable by A because of his own infancy or because of B’s fraud does not prevent A’s promise from being consideration for B’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 78(b)
A makes an oral promise in violation of the Statute of Frauds in exchange for a return promise by B. Is there consideration?
The fact that A’s promise is unenforceable under the local Statute of Frauds does not prevent it from being consideration for B’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 78(c)
A makes a promise in exchange for a promise by B, a foreign government not subject to suit. Is there consideration?
The fact that B’s promise is unenforceable does not prevent it from being consideration for A’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 78(c)
A contracts to sell property to B. As a favor to B, who is C’s friend, and in consideration of A’s performance of the contract, C guarantees that B will pay the agreed price. How would consideration be manifest for C?
A’s performance is consideration for C’s promise. See § 73. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 79(b)
A has executed a document in the form of a guaranty which imposes no obligation on A and has no value. A promises B to pay $10,000 to B for the document. B surrenders the document. Is there consideration?
B’s surrender of the document to A, if bargained for, is consideration for a promise by A to pay $10,000. Compare § 74. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 79(b)
A borrows $300 from B to enable A to begin litigation to recover a gold mine through litigation, and promises to repay $10,000 when he recovers the mine. Is there consideration?
The loan is consideration for the promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 79(c)
A is pregnant with the illegitimate child of B, a wealthy man. A promises to give the child A’s surname and B’s given name, and B promises to provide for the support and education of the child and to set up a trust of securities to provide the child with a minimum net income of $100 per week until he reaches the age of 21. Is there consideration?
The naming of the child is consideration for B’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 79(c)
In consideration of one cent received, A promises to pay $600 in three yearly installments of $200 each. Is there consideration?
The one cent is merely nominal and is not consideration for A’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 79(d)
A dies leaving no assets and owing $4000 to the B bank. C, A’s widow, promises to pay the debt, and B promises to make no claim against A’s estate. Is there consideration?
Without some further showing, B’s promise is a mere formality and is not consideration for C’s promise. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 79(d)
A pays B or promises B to pay him $5, not then owed by A, in consideration of which B promises A to give him a book and also promises to surrender a letter. Is there consideration for either promise?
Both of B’s promises are supported by consideration. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 80(a)
A pays B or promises B to pay him $50 not then owed by A, in exchange for the following promises: a promise by C to dig a well for D, a promise by E to discharge F from a debt of $100 owing by F to E. Is there consideration for any of the promises?
All the promises are supported by consideration. Restatement 2d of Contracts § 80(a)