Chapter 8: Social influence and persuasion Flashcards
Third-person effect
Occurs when people believe the media have a stronger impact on others than on themselves
Autokinetic effect
And illusion caused by very slight movements of the eye, that a stationary point of light in a room is moving
Group norms
The beliefs or behaviors that a group of people accepts as normal
Pluralistic ignorance
Looking to others for cues about how to behave, while they are looking to you; collective misinterpretation
Normative Influence
- Going along the crowd to be liked and accepted.
- Humans have a fundamental need to belong in social groups. (Improves ones chances of survival)
- People learn to conform to their group’s rules
Informational Influence
- Being correct
- Going along with the crowd because you think the crowd
knows more than you do. - Sherif uses autokinetic effect to study formation of group norms.
(Can last at least 1 year & can be passed on) - 2 types of situations increase how likely you are to be affected by i.i:
1. Ambiguous situations
2. Crisis situation - In some cases, nobody knows anything – pluralistic ignorance (e.g. can cause trouble in your learning)
- Pluralistic ignorance happens when people attempt to match a group norm
What are the key differences between Informational influence and Normative influence?
Whether the conforming person believes others are right (informational), or believe they are wrong but conforms simply to avoid rejection (normative).
What did Solomon Asch say about the power of normative influence?
He concluded- to be accepted by the group was more important than to be correct.
Fear of social rejection.
Informational social influence
helps produce private acceptance – a genuine inner belief that others are right.
Normative social influence
may bring about public compliance – outwardly going along with the group but maintaining a private, inner belief that the group is wrong, or having doubts about the group’s decisions.
Social influence techniques can be organized according to 4 basic principles:
- commitment and consistency
- reciprocation
- scarcity
- capturing and disrupting attention
Techniques based on COMMITEMENT & CONSITENCY
- once people make a commitment, they feel pressure to behave consistently with that commitment.
- Inconsistent behavior = Cognitive dissonance (psychological discomfort)
FOOT-IN-THE-DOOR TECHNIQUE
- You start with a small request to get eventual compliance with a larger request.
- If the requests get bigger slowly and gradually, the person may be more willing to comply with each one.
LOW-BALL TECHNIQUE
- One first gets a person to comply with a seemingly low-cost request and only later reveals hidden additional costs.
- Original price = ‘low-ball’
- It works because people often justify their decisions.
BAIT-AND-SWITCH TECHNIQUE
- One draws people in with an attractive offer that is unavailable and then switches them
to a less attractive offer that is available. YOU ESSENTIALLY BECOME BAITED. - Relies on consistency pressures to keep them committed even when the influencer changes the terms.
LANELLING TECHNIQUE
- One assigns a label to an individual and then requests a favour that is consistent with the label.
- “You are such a generous person.”- and then requesting them to give something to you.
- Can persuade both children and adults.
- People like to live up to labels.
- It also uses the importance of self-concepts (how people think about themselves can influence their behaviour).
Defences against techniques based on Commitment and Consistency
c- Commitment and consistency principle is a great time saver.
- When people weigh advantages vs disadvantages, they will feel overwhelmed.
- This principle creates a sense of obligation.
LEGITIMISATION-OF-PALTRY-FAVOURS TECHNIQUE
- Involves a phrase that suggests that even a very small amount of aid will help.
- E.g., ‘even a cent will help’
- Even-a-cent method (you cannot deny such a small donation)
Techniques based on RECIPROCATION
- If you take care of me, I’ll take care of you- cultural principle
- People feel guilty if they cannot repay someone.
DOOR-IN-THE-FACE TECHNIQUE
- One starts with an inflated request and then retreats to a smaller request that appears to be a concession.
- Basically, start with and exaggerated request and then retreat to a smaller request.
- E.g., ‘Can I have a pack of gum?’ ⟶ ‘Can I have a piece of gum?’
- The smaller request is the actual desired request.
- It is the opposite of the foot-in-the-door technique.
- The key is to pretend that you are doing someone a favour by giving a smaller second request.
When does the Door in the face technique not work?
- the first request is seen as unreasonable
- If different people make the first and second request.
THAT’S-NOT-ALL TECHNIQUE
- One first makes an inflated request but, before the person can respond, sweetens the deal by offering a discount or bonus.
- Based on reciprocal concessions and a sense of personal obligation.
- Increases compliance because it is in our HUMAN NATURE to reciprocate.
- Thus, people can easily be exploited and be taken advantage of by other people.
Defence against techniques based on reciprocation
- Be ready to define them as tricks if they are tricks.
- Once this is done you will no longer feel obliged to reciprocate.
- Reciprocation rule says ‘Favours are to be repaid by favours’ - Thus, tricks do not have to be repaid by favours!
Scarcity principle
Rare opportunities and items are more valuable than those that are plentiful.
Why does the scarcity principle work?
- Takes more effort to obtain rare items than plentiful ones.
- People value their freedom highly.
What is a HEURISTIC CUE
a prompt or stimulus that helps people learn something for themselves
LIMITED-NUMBER TECHNIQUE
One tells people that an item is in short supply
FAST-APPROACHING-DEADLINE TECHNIQUE
One tells people an item or price is only available for a limited time.