Chapter 8 Flashcards
Two explanations for the role of evil spirits in sinful behaviour
- Temptation- humans have free will but the devil tempts
2. Possession- wrongdoers were possessed, find guilt through trial by ordeal
Blaming social problems on the Devil and other evil spirits was a means to achieve two objectives:
- It diverted attention from the failings of elites and placed blame on individuals who were “possessed” by the Devil
- Those in power made themselves indispensable by saying only they could stop the Devil
Inquisition
half a million put to death in 300 years
Witches
- The accused were mostly women, especially independent women not protected by a male
- Witch hunts reinforced the power of the existing social hierarchy
The enlightenment
- Scientific Revolution caused a change in thinking
- Focus on systematic doubt, empirical and sensory verification of ideas
- Ideas shifted away from fanaticism and religious superstition to naturalistic explanation based on reason and the scientific method (observation)
- This prompted a more scientific approach to understanding crime and criminal behaviour
Enlightenment philosophers’ view of society
- Composed of free and rational human beings
- People enter into a social contract: they agree to give up some freedom for a safer society
- This contributed to the movement throughout Europe to reform governance and criminal justice
The classical school: Beccaria
- Beccaria criticized the cruelty, inhumanity, and arbitrariness of the current justice system
- In 18th-century England, as many as 350 offences were punishable by death
- Beccaria helped focus the movement for humanitarian reform in Europe
The classical school: reform
- The unjust and inhumane treatment of people ran counter to ideals of the Enlightenment
- Ideals of the social contract were not realized; most were denied fair and impartial treatment
- Calls for humanitarian reform
- Reform should follow ideals of what we now know as the Classical School of Criminology
Social contract with the state
- Give up some freedom for a safer society
- The state had to provide protection but could not violate the rights of citizens
- -Citizens were required to obey the rules or face punishment from the state
The classical theory of crime
Reforms proposed by the Classical theorists were based on radical new theory of the causes of crime
- People broke the law because they thought that doing so would advance their own interests
- This theory was based on the assumption that people are rational beings who calculate the consequences of their actions
i. e., crime and deviance were not the result of some supernatural force or demonic possession
Ideas on crime control emerged from this theory of the rational criminal:
- Penalties will deter people from breaking the law
- Influenced by the Enlightenment and the social contract, justice must avoid excessive and unfair punishment.
- Punishment should fit the crime and should be proportional to the harm done to society
- This is most effective deterrent and the fairest way to punish; anything more would break the social contract
- Punishment would be severe enough that it would cost individuals more than they could gain from crime
Classical theory of crime: punishment
- To be effective, punishment should be swift and certain
- If punishment followed too long after the act, or if it was unlikely to happen at all, then the law would not be an effective deterrent to crime
- Laws are most effective in preventing crime if they areclear and simple enough that people can understand them.
Specific reforms
- `Stop executing people for minor offences
- Criminal matters should be dealt with in public according to the dictates of the law
- Laws should be accessible to all
- Separate the lawmaking power of the legislature from the role of judges
- Laws to be set by legislatures while judges determined guilt and administered punishment
These reforms provided the foundation for the modern criminal justice system:
Equality before the law Guarantee of one’s rights Establishment of fixed penalties Due process safeguards Separation of judicial and legislative systems
Limitations of the classical school
- Equal punishments for the same crime did not:
- Allow for flexibility
- Factor in personal considerations or mitigating circumstances of individual offenders
- Judges had no discretion:
- e.g., same fine levied to rich and poor
- Could not individualize sentences to each offender’s circumstances