Chapter 8 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What kind of questions did Finlay and Eatough ask people? What did they focus on?

A

What is the experience of making a meaningful connection does its others? They focused on people’s descriptions of similar experiences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What kind of questions do phenomenologists ask?

A

Distinctive research questions about people’s experience of the world (to find commonalities in structure).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are phenomenologists interested in?

A

People’s own experiences (not our interpretations) in sociology-cultural lifeworlds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why has attraction and the forming of relationships recently become a focus of research again?

A

Social change in the west - technology, dating apps etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Because the literature on attraction and relationship formation is fragmented, Finkel and Eastwidk attempted to integrate three meta theoretical principles. What do these have in common?

A

Satisfy needs/goals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the three theoretical principles that Finkel and Eastwick tried to integrate?

A

Domain-general reward perspectives (e.g. Pleasure, belonging, self-esteem, consistency); domain-specific evolutionary perspectives; attachment perspectives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

According to Finkel and Eastwick, what is the purpose of relationships?

A

Instrumentality (other people are used as a means to an end/achieve goals).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are two problems with Finkel and Eastwick’s research?

A

Used American undergraduate SS, the assumption of instrumentality guided the data rather than emerging from the data (so problems of validity).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What do phenomenologists need to do before they explain?

A

Describe and gain insight into meaning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why do phenomenologists bracket out theory?

A

So data can speak for itself (rather than preconceptions).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What five facets did Finlay and Eatough find in their participants’ experiential accounts? What evidence of instrumentality was there?

A

Bonding, fellowship, destiny, chemistry, love. No evidence of instrumentality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is phenomenological reduction?

A

No preconceptions, biases. Avoid abstracting, theorizing, generalizing. Gain access to ‘the things themselves’ (don’t define experience for participants beforehand).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the first epoché?

A

No natural scientific thinking, no lens but on its own terms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In the second epoché, do we return to the natural attitude?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In the second epoché, what do we focus on?

A

Focus on how something is subjectively experienced and its meaning in a person’s lifeworld.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does phenomenological analysis involve?

A

Systematic readings, empathic immersion, iterative, emergent understandings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

According to Ihde, what are three processes which can help achieve phenomenological reduction?

A

Description (don’t use existing theories); horizontalisation (treat everything as equally important, don’t impose hierarchy of meaning/importance); verification (constantly check back with person to see if that was what was really meant).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Why would phenomenology be different to, for example, psychoanalysis?

A

Phenomenology stays close to the data whereas psychoanalysis approaches data from a specific theoretical framework/lens.

19
Q

Do phenomenologists believe it is possible to obtain a ‘god’s eye view’?

A

No but still need to limit/bracket preconceptions as much as possible.

20
Q

How do phenomenologists collect data?

A

Usually interviews but also written protocol where asked to write down as much detail (uncensored descriptions of concrete experiences, not opinions) as possible. This is usually followed by a semi-structured interview.

21
Q

What does it mean to say that intentionality involves a relational context?

A

Anything focused on needs to be examined as a part of a whole context. This lifeworld is shared by others but perceived differently by everyone.

22
Q

Why is love good for understanding the lifeworld?

A

Because its definition and the experience of it vary depending on context. It is culturally and temporally variable.

23
Q

Even if different experiences of love share the same essence (underlying features), how must they be understood? What does this focus on the lifeworld allow one to do?

A

In the context of a particular life in a broader sociocultural lifeworld. This allows a focus on subjective individual experience and how the sociocultural world influences this.

24
Q

How did Langdridge et al investigate romantic jealousy?

A

Used memory-work; a group of researchers produced and analyzed own memories.

25
Q

What did Langdridge et al discover about jealousy?

A

Disruptor moment, embodied, visceral, threat to self-image, challenges idea of predisposition to jealousy, challenges idea that polyamorous relationships always produce jealousy.

26
Q

What did Eatough and Smith find out about anger?

A

Intensely felt emotion, transformed into a different person, embodied, heat/redness in the body, complex and not unidimensional.

27
Q

What is interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA)very similar to?

A

Thematic analysis (and criticized for the similarity).

28
Q

What is the aim of IPA?

A

Understand lived experiences and how people make sense of them.

29
Q

What is the analytic method of IPA?

A

Steps which need to be followed to produce themes.

30
Q

What are the dimensions of the lifeworld?

A

Temporality, spatiality, sociality, embodiment.

31
Q

What is the significance of temporality?

A

Lived experience of time (phenomenological time) versus clock time.

A concrete experience is a now which is related to a past and a future.

32
Q

What is the significance of spatiality?

A

We can examine our relationship to objects in our space and how they structure our lives.

33
Q

What is the significance of sociality (aka intersubjectivity or relationality)?

A

We exist in relation to others and construct our identities in relation to others even when alone.

34
Q

What is the significance of embodiment?

A

The ‘body-subject’ is interrelated. Consciousness is located in our flesh and blood. Bodies are objects and parts of our subjective understanding. Help create an identity (ethnic, gender, sexuality, ill).

35
Q

What does phenomenology help challenge?

A

A lot of assumptions which are taken for granted in other research.

36
Q

Many of our assumptions about the grieving process come from whose model?

A

Kübler-Ross

37
Q

What are the stages of Kübler-Ross’ model?

A

Denial and isolation, anger, negotiation, depression, acceptance.

38
Q

What has the presentation of Kübler-Ross’ model made people think?

A

That people follow the stages in order.

39
Q

What are some criticisms of K-R’s stage model?

A

That it is limited, simplistic, restrictive, there aren’t distinct stages, that the acceptance stage is problematic for understanding adaptation to grief.

40
Q

How can the K-R model influence our experience of grief?

A

We understand our own experience via this model which shows the power of models to construct rather than describe.

41
Q

What was Spaten et al’s study? What has previous research on this area shown?

A

Phenomenological analysis looking at men’s experiences of grief. Interview three men whose partners had died from cancer. Previous research had shown that it is harder for men to adapt to loss.

42
Q

What did the Spaten et al study show?

A

Rupture in lifeworlds, continuing material time versus stopping of own psychic world, emptiness and grief, zombie-like experiences, deeply embodied, worse than physical pain, anger, injustice, interplay of emotions, loss of planned future, meaning to life returned after time, remake identity, value friends and family, incorporate loss into story of self. Overcome adversity and make life meaningful. Therefore complex and multifaceted, unpredictable and not stage

43
Q

What does looking at experience as it is lived help us do?

A

Learn more about the human condition.