CHAPTER 8 Flashcards

1
Q

The BIG FIVE-factor model- why are their five traits?

A

 Meta-research evidence has generally supported a 5 Factor model
 However, there has also been a 3 factor universal model and a 6 factor
contemporary model proposed with strong evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

THE “BIG FIVE” FACTORS

A

Costa & McCrae (1992) NEO-PI-R / NEO-PI-3
 Openness
 Conscientiousness
 Extraversion
 Agreeableness
 Neuroticism
 “O-C-E-A-N” (John, 1990)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Goldberg (1992) Adjective Inventorie- how did it differentiate from Costa & McCrae’s model?

A

 Self-report ratings of Big Five Factors
 Same overall factors as Costa & McCrae above
 But C&M and Goldberg developed different ways to measure it …
 Goldberg - Bipolar (e.g. opposites) ratings (using adjectives) (defined by test popn)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is openness (TO NEW EXPERIENCE)

A

OPENNESS is a general appreciation for creativity,
adventure, unusual ideas, imagination, curiosity, and
variety of experience

 The trait distinguishes imaginative people from
down-to-earth conventional people

 Facets (6) Fantasy; Aesthetics; Feelings; Ideas;
Actions; Values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

People who are open to
experience are…

A

 intellectually curious, appreciative of art,
and sensitive to beauty

 They tend to be more creative and more aware of their feelings

 They are more likely to hold unconventional beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Openness to experience: facet measurement example

A

The NEO PI-R personality test measures six facets of openness to experience:

Fantasy - the tendency toward a vivid imagination and fantasy life.

Aesthetics - the tendency to appreciate art, music, and poetry.

Feelings - being receptive to inner emotional states and valuing emotional experience.

Actions - the inclination to try new activities, visit new places, and try new foods.

Ideas - the tendency to be intellectually curious and open to new ideas.

Values - the readiness to re-examine traditional social, religious, and political values.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Closedness (opposite to openness)

A

> People with low scores on openness tend to have more conventional, traditional interests

> They prefer the plain, un-nuanced, noncomplex, and obvious over the complex, ambiguous, and subtle

> They may regard the arts and sciences with suspicion or view these endeavours as uninteresting

> Poly-math
Leon Battista Alberti (1404–72) was, person that “can do all things if they will.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Openness attributes and example person with said attributes

A

Attributes:
Da Vinci: painter,
sculptor, architect, musician,
scientist, mathematician; polymath

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Closedness attribute and example person with said attributes

A

Attributes:
Tony Soprano: Normal/plain,
conventional,
“the old ways”, traditional,
conservative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Psychological aspects to openness experience - Sam Gosling’s research

A

Sam Gosling’s research suggests it is possible to assess openness by examining one’s home and/or workspace.

> Highly open individuals tend to have distinctive and unconventional decorations
books on a wide variety of topics, a diverse music collection, and art on display

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Openness to experience correlates with what? It is related to what?

A

Openness correlates with creativity, as measured by tests of divergent thinking
> i.e., spontaneous, free-flowing, “non-linear” manner

Openness is related to need for cognition
motivational tendency to think about ideas, scrutinize information, and solve puzzles

Those highly open to experience are generally more open to different cultures, foods and lifestyles because they tend towards exploration over “knowing”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Those highly open to experience are generally more what? What are their values?

A

open to different cultures, foods and lifestyles because they tend towards
exploration over “knowing.”

Values: “knowledge (seeking)” – moving towards the “unknown”(chaos) rather than “known” (order)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the Explorer/Hero archetype?

A

Unknown (Chaos) vs. Known (Order)

Hero:
> exploring the unknown, fighting adversity, and succeeding.

Reverse:
> Stay with what we know or look for new information/experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Conscientiousness is defined as:

A

The tendency to self-discipline, act dutifully and aim for achievement
Traits include being organized, methodic, and thorough (industriousness)

> It influences how we control, regulate, and direct our impulses (e.g., delayed gratification)

> Facets (6): Self‐discipline; Dutifulness; Competence; Order; Deliberation; Achievement striving

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Psychological aspects of conscientiousness

A

> High conscientiousness: more organized and less cluttered in their homes and offices

> For example, their books tend to be neatly shelved in alphabetical order, or categorized by topic, rather than scattered around the room

> Their clothes tend to be folded and arranged in drawers/closets; not lying on the floor

> The presence of planners and to-do lists are correlated with conscientiousness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Conscientiousness is related to what? What about low levels?

A

is related to successful academic performance in students

> Low levels of conscientiousness are strongly associated with facebook usage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Research indicates that after overall cognitive abilities are controlled for, conscientiousness is one of the best predictors of what?

A

> performance in the workplace / academia

> However, some aspects (i.e., facets) of openness (intellectual environment), disagreeableness (single-focus), and low neuroticism also relate (but more so in the workplace>academia)

> Conscientious employees are generally more reliable, more motivated, and harder working

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the definition of extraversion?

A

> Extraversion is characterized by positive emotions, surgency, and the tendency to seek out stimulation and the company of others

> The trait is marked by pronounced engagement with the external world

> In groups extraverts tend to talk more, assert themselves, and draw attention to themselves

> Facets (6): Gregariousness; Activity Level; Assertiveness; Excitement Seeking; Positive Emotions; Warmth*
Warmth loads on Agreeableness in Goldberg’s FFM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the behavioural differences between extraverts and introverts?

A

> Extraverts tend to wear more decorative clothing
whereas introverts prefer practical, comfortable clothes

> Extraverts are likely to prefer more upbeat and energetic music than introverts

> Extraverts decorate their offices more, keep their doors open, keep extra chairs nearby, and are more likely to put dishes of candy on their desks
These are attempts to engage with co-workers and encourage interaction

> Introverts decorate less and tend to arrange their workspace to discourage social interaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Introverts lack what?

A

> Introverts lack the social exuberance and activity levels of extraverts

> They tend to seem quiet, low-key, deliberate, and less involved in the social world

> Their lack of social involvement should not be interpreted as shyness or depression

> Introverts simply require less stimulation than extraverts and thus spend relatively more time alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is ambiversion?

A

> Ambiversion is a term used to describe people who fall more or less in the middle of the continuum and exhibit tendencies of both groups

> An ambivert is normally comfortable with groups and enjoys social interaction, but also relishes time alone and away from the crowd (…hmm, sound familiar to you?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Do introversion and extraversion fall on a continuum?

A

> Although extraverts and introverts have real personality and behaviour differences, it is important to avoid pigeonholing or stereotyping by personality
Extraversion / Introversion vary along a continuum, we often see a mixture of both orientations

> Situational differences: An introvert may act extroverted in various scenarios (e.g., social conformity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is agreeableness?

A

> Agreeableness is a tendency to be compassionate and cooperative rather than suspicious and antagonistic towards others

> The trait reflects individual differences in general concern for social harmony
Agreeable individuals value having a good relationship with others

> They are generally considerate, friendly, generous, helpful, and willing to compromise their interests with others; more submissive

> Agreeable people also have an optimistic view of human nature - they believe people are basically honest, decent, and trustworthy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is dis-agreeableness?

A

Disagreeable individuals often place self-interest above having a good relationship with others

They are generally more dominating/forceful/focused (e.g., managerial positions; CEO)

They are generally less concerned with others’ well-being, and are less likely to extend themselves for other people

Sometimes their skepticism about others’ motives causes them to be suspicious, unfriendly, and uncooperative

25
Q

Agreeableness: how it affects interpersonal relations

A

> Agreeableness is an asset in a wide range of social situations agreeable individuals are biased toward liking others and viewing them in a positive light, whereas disagreeable people are more negative, pessimistic

> One study found that people high in agreeableness are more emotionally responsive in social situations

> The research also shows that people high in agreeableness are more likely to control negative emotions like anger in conflict situations

> Co-operative: Agreeable’s are also more willing to “give ground” or be “submissive” in conflicts in order to maintain a congenial relationship with another person

26
Q

Agreeableness: Pro-social behavior

A

A central feature of agreeableness is its positive association with altruism and helping behavior

Across situations, people who are high in agreeableness are more likely to report an interest and involvement with helping others
> Not only their own Kin (nepotism)
> agreeable people appear to be “traited for helping“ and do not need any other motivations

27
Q

How do we define neuroticism?

A

Neuroticism is the tendency to “over-experience” negative emotions, such as anger, anxiety, or depression

> It is sometimes called emotional instability (e.g., as in borderline & histrionic personality disorders)

Those who score high in neuroticism are emotionally reactive and vulnerable to stress
> They are more likely to interpret ordinary situations as threatening, and minor frustrations as hopelessly difficult

> Facets (6): Anxiety; Self‐consciousness; Depression; Vulnerability; Impulsiveness; Angry hostility

28
Q

Neuroticism: sample items from the NEO-PI-3

A

> Neurotics negative emotional reactions tend to persist for unusually long periods of time, which means they are often in a bad mood

> These problems in emotional regulation can diminish the neurotics ability to think clearly, make decisions, and cope effectively with stress
remember H-A-L-T? A=Angry

> Individuals low in neuroticism are less easily upset and are less emotionally reactive
They tend to be calm, emotionally stable, and free from persistent negative feelings

29
Q

How was the big-five developed?

A

> The Big Five was developed much like Cattell, Allport and Eysenck’s factor models – by using language

THE DIFFERENCE:
Big Five differed in that people came up with the words themselves to describe people

> The idea was based around evolutionary psychology
As we evolve, we develop and retain the most useful and distinguishing words to differentiate and describe people

30
Q

What is the The Fundamental Lexical Hypothesis (Goldberg, 1990)

A

“the most important individual differences in human transactions will come to be encoded as single terms in some or all of the world’s languages”

In effect, there should be human universals of language

If so, we should see the same words, labels, descriptions across cultures if it is truly evolutionary

31
Q

Limitations to the lexical hypothesis consist of:

A

Translation
Words and meanings differ across cultures
Sometimes there is no word or the precision is different (e.g. snow, “sorry”)
Direct translation
The Big Five are US-based factors – these may not be important factors in other cultures (e.g. extraversion in North America may look very different to extraversion in other parts of the world)

Culturally specific Big Five’s (e.g. develop own traits based on own language):
How do we answer self-report questionnaires about ourselves?
a research study found little to no neuroticism in Italians (dolce/bella vita? Fake good?)
a new factor of ‘culture’ found in Chinese society (historical influences?)

Sex differences
More pronounced differences in egalitarian (high gender equality) societies and cultures

32
Q

What does the NEO-PI-3 entail?

A

Costa & McCrae (1992) NEO-PI-3 structure
Theoretically very similar to Goldberg’s bipolar measure but different structure
5 Factors are made up of 6 facets each
There are 8 test items to measure each facet
8 x 6 x 5 = 240 test items (questions) in entire NEO-PI-3 assessment

33
Q

What is the reliability of the NEO-PI-3

A

Can be used self-report or as “peer-report” (report by a spouse or peer)
concurrent and convergent validity (e.g., last lecture)
Shows good reliability between self-report and peer-repor

34
Q

What is the validity of the NEO-PI-3?

A

Good agreement with Goldberg’s (1992) adjective inventories

However, some disagreement in relation to “Openness factor”

Goldberg emphasises intellectual and creative cognition

35
Q

All other personality theories we have discussed involve something about process or psychological entities that attempts to explain behaviour – does the Big Five?

A

> The criticism is that factors are merely descriptors – they describe people

> The five factors say nothing about processes or actual psychological entities (e.g. motivations, structure or theory of personality, development, etc)

36
Q

McCrae & Costa suggest what about the five-factor theory?

A

They suggest, the factors (our basic tendencies) have a causal relationship on our character and behaviour, separate from environmental or external influences (i.e., inherited traits) [think… “predisposition”]

37
Q

What are problems with the five-factor model?

A

(1) No explanation/evidence of how factors cause behaviour (e.g. contrast to the id shaping our behaviour)

(2) Much research shows that traits are affected by social factors (nurture)
Twenge (2002) found an increase in Neuroticism (anxiety) from 1950’s to 1990’s
Hypothesised to be due to increased crime rates, higher divorce, egocentric lifestyles, etc.
and now… COVID
We can change our BIG5 scores with small behavioural modifications (nurture) and/or changes in the environment (nurture) (e.g., psychological treatment for neuroticism for example)

(3) Factors are developed from aggregate analysis of the population as a whole – who’s to say that every one of us has a neuroticism / emotional stability factor?
What if we scored directly in the middle of all scales (or even just one) can we say that we reliably have those constructs/factors? (e.g., ambiversion – is it simply situational?)

38
Q

What is the stability of the five factors?

A

Do our factor scores (Extraversion, Openness, etc.) change across our lifespan?
They do change a little but are remarkably stable
We have highly correlated factor scores no matter what point in our life we measure it (extraversion as a child is highly correlated with extraversion as an adult

However, we do see certain patterns of change …
Think about yourself as a teenager/now versus how
your parents are…

Agreeableness & Conscientiousness
higher in older adulthood

Extraversion, Neuroticism and Openness*
lower in older adulthood

39
Q

Vocational applications of the big-five model?

A

High E – social and enterprising occupations
CEO of financial company

High O – artistic and creative occupations
Screen writer, music producer, software engineer

High C – consistent and effective workers
Graduate students, professional occupations

40
Q

Health, clinical, and forensic applications of the big-five model?

A

Health:
High C – live longer!

Clinical:
High N and High C – Compulsive & Anxious personality (OCD, eating and anxiety disorders)

Forensic:
Low A and Low C – Anti-social personality

41
Q

Walter Mischel (1960)
Argued…

A

> Argued that people don’t act consistently at all

> People vary their actions to fit the situation

> Two types of consistency:
Longitudinal stability
Your trait score at one time will be similar to your trait score at another time
Cross-situational stability
Your trait score in one situation will be similar to your trait score in another situation

> Trait theorist (generally) say both are “true”: however, critics (like Mischel) disagree

42
Q

Mischel and Peake (1983) studied what?

A

Conscientiousness of college students
Asked them to rate their conscientiousness on multiple occasions and then aggregate these scores

Found good longitudinal consistency (semester to semester) but…

Found poor cross-situational consistency (setting to setting)
e.g. good note takers and good marks (classroom/school), but messy rooms (home)
However, we know that college is a very different environment in of itself (e.g. time commitments/pressure)

But, cross-situational consistency higher if we look at behaviours/task in a similar setting/task
What is the meaning/purpose or context of what you are doing?
e.g. consistency in behaviours when alone
e.g. consistency in behaviours when “working”

43
Q

Biggest criticism of trait approaches: person-situation controversy III

A

> Good evidence for Longitudinal consistency

> Cross-situational far more difficult to answer

> Researchers look at personality across similar situations to assess…
For example: measuring a person’s (social) anxiety at a house-party vs. a nightclub
But how to assess “similar”?
How do we define anxiety? are we always extraverted?

44
Q

Conclusions about the person situation contreversy III

A

> People act relatively consistently over time but also vary to different degrees across situation

> If we accept that people show longitudinal consistency, yet there are some variations, perhaps traits are more “situational pre-dispositions” than overtly deterministic

> In other words, all things being relatively equal across situations people will more likely act in a consistent and predictable way.

> For example, in criminal profiling: homology assumption – an offender’s crime behaviour does not significantly differ from their non-crime behaviour, but situation is accounted for

> We hypothesise, from experience, what we think we will achieve by performing a particular behaviour – so to achieve Y we perform X (if possible) (e.g., an offender’s modus operandi)

45
Q

Critical evaluation of trait theory?

A

The Database
> Excellent.

Objectivity in data collection and analysis is paramount
Objective data, not relying on clinical interviews or idiographic approaches

> Diversity
Large numbers of people – different ages, ethnicities and socio-cultural backgrounds
Massive number of research publications in relation to trait theories & the Big Five

> Different types of data
S-data and O-data

> Major Limitation
Learn about populations overall (i.e., aggregated data), not the individual per se
Validity in relating nomothetic approaches to the individual?

46
Q

Is trait theory systematic?

A

Do trait theorists tie together an integrated account of personality structure, process and development?

Yes and no.
> Cattell analysed traits, roles and motivational processes
Eysenck related traits to biological entities (e.g., the nervous system and arousal)
However, contemporary trait theorists would receive poor marks for systematic process (i.e., causal, motivational) development
For example, Costa & McCrae did little to account for the dynamic processes (motivational) of their five-factor model (FFM)

Nonetheless, more and more research is being done now relating neuro-biological aspects to big five factors

47
Q

Is trait theory systematic?

A

Do trait theorists tie together an integrated account of personality structure, process and development?

Yes and no.
> Cattell analysed traits, roles and motivational processes
Eysenck related traits to biological entities (e.g., the nervous system and arousal)
However, contemporary trait theorists would receive poor marks for systematic process (i.e., causal, motivational) development
For example, Costa & McCrae did little to account for the dynamic processes (motivational) of their five-factor model (FFM)

Nonetheless, more and more research is being done now relating neuro-biological aspects to big five factors

48
Q

Is trait theory testable?

A

Absolutely.
Possibly the reason there are so many studies related to trait theory is the fact that it is so easily testable
It’s an objective measure (e.g., mathematical outcomes are related to test items) and can be lead by theory or lead by analysis
With so much research and various models it is also relatively easy to assess validity (by comparing models)
These reliable measures (Big Five, PEN, 16PF, etc.) can be statistically related to other aspects of human existence and psychology

For example, we can compare any quantifiable variable:
How do Undergrads vs Postgrads differ in P-E-N factors?
How do politicians of opposing parties rate on the Big Five?
The “Big Hack” (Netflix) – advertising companies have created a FFM profile of YOU that they use to target YOU with specific advertisements (based on your FFM profile)

49
Q

Are trait theories comprehensive?

A

Yes and No.

On the analytical side of things, trait theory is extremely comprehensive
Vast lexical analysis across cultures, ages, socio-cultural groups

On the theoretical side it is mostly non-comprehensive in the psychological sense
Very little is explained about how we might use the factors or measures for anything other than descriptive research

50
Q

What are applications of trait theory?

A

Somewhat, dependent on the application!

 As a predictive tool and a measure to differentiate broadly between people it is useful as an applied tool

 Organisational psychology (World War 2)

 Personality research

 As for it’s clinical application, it is unclear of how it can be directly used
effectively

 This is mainly because we don’t have any guidance on the causality or the
processes involved in the factor structures found

51
Q

What are major contributions to trait theory?

A

Made substantial gains in personality theory in terms of assessing similarities and differences between people

These similarities and differences between us can lead to predictions about the relationships to many various psychological and non-psychological aspects of human nature

Simplified a vast lexical swarm of adjectives used to describe people into a concise, reliable and valid set of 3, 5 or even 6 factors
That is quite a feat in itself

First empirical attempts to wed the biological drives (nature) to the psychological aspects of personality (nurture)
As we progress through the rest of the chapters we will see these wed more and more…

52
Q

Focus on results with conscientiousness entail:

A

> self-discipline
deliberation
achievement striving
dutifulness
order
competence

DC - SODA

53
Q

Focus on the new with openness entails:

A

> fantasy
values
aesthetics
feelings
actions
ideas

FAFA-IV

54
Q

Focus on the outside world with extraversion entails (6 FACETS):

A

> Gregariousness
Assertiveness
activity
excitement seeking
positive emotion
warmth

GAPE-AW

55
Q

Focus on the emotional instability with neuroticism entails (6 FACETS):

A

> Anxiety
Hostility
Depression
Self-consciousness
Impulsiveness
Vulnerability

56
Q

What are values?

A

Values: “knowledge (seeking)” – moving towards the “unknown”(chaos) rather than “known” (order)

57
Q

Low agreeable rated individuals and agression

A

While agreeable individuals are habitually likely to help others, disagreeable people may be more likely to harm others

Researchers have found that low levels of agreeableness are associated with hostile thoughts and aggression in adolescents, as well as poor social adjustment

People low in agreeableness are also more likely to be prejudiced

In terms of personality disorders: low agreeableness is often associated with narcissistic and anti-social tendencies

58
Q

How the prof sees applications of trait theory

A

Text: Trait theory has not generated a strategy for therapy
 Prof Goodwill: ok, but…. Personality (measures) can inform the clinician plus
validate formulations
 However, factors such as Neuroticism point to problems in dealing with
negative emotions (e.g. anxiety) and emotional instability
 A host of therapeutic strategies relate to treating the more neurotic
symptoms (e.g., negative self-evaluation), most notably Cognitive Theories –

59
Q

Conflict tactics for varying levels of agreeableness

A

High Agreeableness: More likely to use constructive tactics when in conflict with others
Low Agreeableness: More likely to use coercive / manipulative / forceful tactics