CHAPTER 6 Flashcards
Who is Julian Baggini
is a journalist and philosopher who studies the complexities of personal identity. He is the editor-in-chief of the Philosophers’ Magazine.
To be fulfilled actualized individuals we must
experience life, in all its twists and turns
It makes us who we are, rather than who we want (not choose) to be (i.e., flippant; a Persona)
The development of the self according to Julian Baggini:
> If you wish to be a benevolent person (value), then you must experience being a benevolent person
> Before we achieve any ability we will fail, make mistakes, and have to try again
> Live life as our highest good, our most excellent self
> We cannot control the world around us, only how we respond to it > we must always respond with courage, temperance, wisdom, and justice
> Life is unpredictable and impermanent
Where does psychological distress come from?
An incongruence between the Self and experiences (our beliefs and actions govern this…)
Phenomenology involves:
> Phenomenology – morality (beliefs/actions) – (e.g., Crime and punishment – Dostoevsky)
> Tension within humans of good and evil (benevolent and malevolent)
A psychologically healthy person is:
Is able to assimilate experiences into their self-structure (beliefs) – good and bad
Is open to experience (actions) rather than reacting to experience in a defensive manner
A psychologically unhealthy person:
Incongruent experiences are either denied completely or distorted
> This creates a discrepancy with actual experience and the Self’s awareness of the experience
> This is termed the self-experience discrepancy (i.e., a discrepancy between self and
experience)
> We create defences against this
What is the rationalization defense?
The experience to maintain congruence between the self and experience (simply a justification/excuse, but a rational one)
> involves the reality of the situation and self-talk
What is the fantasy defense?
Create a fantasy world to maintain congruence
What are examples of the fantasy defense?
> I may think I’m extremely valued by others (incongruent view of reality;
narcissism, histrionic)
> I may think I’m extremely unvalued by others (incongruent view of reality;
depression)
> In both, I may feel no or little self-experience discrepancy as it has become pervasive
What is defense is associated with the experience discrepancy between the environment and it’s context?
The fantasy defense
What defense is associated with the experience discrepancy between others?
The projection defense
What defense is associated with the experience discrepancy in the self?
The Rationalization defense
Rogers models of developing and fostering psychological change are very prominent today, they include:
Person-centred therapy, ACT, mindfulness therapy, CBT, etc
Conditions necessary for Rogerian Therapeutic Change are:
Non-directive approach
Allow clients to reflect on thoughts, feelings, behaviour
Person- or client- centred therapy
Emphasises an active role of the therapist; individualised therapy (responsivity)
The therapeutic climate entails:
Client and Therapist equality (i.e., partnership) – aka the “Therapeutic Alliance”
What are the three therapist-centred conditions necessary for good therapeutic climate/environment:
1) Genuineness (i.e., authenticity; truthfulness)
2) Unconditional positive regard (i.e., like a parent)
3) Empathic understanding (i.e., compassion)
Genuineness entails:
> Therapist is themselves
Open and transparent
Speaks honestly (non-distortive)
> Inter-logic (an absolute truth; “never tell a lie”) vs Consequential (a truth that would hurt the person; “white lie”) [see Gad Saad for more]
Unconditional Positive Regard entails:
Therapist communicates a deep and genuine caring for the client as a person
Empathetic understanding entails:
Therapist strives to understand how the client perceives the world through active listening and empathetic concern
Albert Ellis’ (Rational emotive behavioural therapy)
> The premise of REBT is that humans do not get emotionally disturbed by unfortunate circumstances
> But by how they construct their views of these circumstances
> Based on their language, evaluative beliefs, meanings and philosophies about the world, themselves and others
> Antidote – “reframing”