Chapter 7 - Attitude Change Flashcards
What arouses cognitive dissonance?
Feeling bad about irrational behaviour.
How do we reduce cognitive dissonance? 4 ways
ways that dissonance can be reduced:
- change attitude to be consonant with their behaviour
- change behaviour to be consonant with their attitude
- maintain both the attitude and the behaviour, but introduce an additional consonant cognition to restore consonance between them both, rationalizing undesirable behaviour by arguing that it has some positive benefits
- reducing the importance of one of the dissonant cognitions and/or increasing the importance of one of the consonant cognitions
According to effort justification paradigm, does a severe initiation increase or decrease new recruits’ commitment to the group?
A severe initiation to join a group might increase recruits’ evaluations of the group, because they will be motivated to justify their suffering by perceiving the group as attractive or worthwhile.
Defone/explain: cognitive dissonance theory
a model that states that awareness of consonant cognitions makes us feel good, whereas awareness of dissonant cognitions makes us feel bad, the unpleasant feelings produced by dissonant cognitions motivate us to do something to change our state
What are: consonant cognitions
beliefs that are consistent or compatible with one another, imply that the other is valid/good, ex. “I brush my teeth twice a day” &“tooth brushing prevents cavities”
What are: dissonant cognitions
beliefs that are inconsistent or logically discrepant with one another, imply that the other is wrong/bad, ex. “I smoke” & “Smoking causes cancer”
Define/explain: induced compliance paradigm
a research methodology used to test dissonance theory that arouses dissonance by getting people to engage in counterattitudinal behaviour, participants are induced to comply with an experimenter’s request so that they behave in a way that is inconsistent with their attitudes, tests how people change their attitudes in order to reduce the dissonance they create
Define/explain: counterattitudinal behaviour
behaviour that is counter to, or inconsistent with, an individual’s attitudes
What are the 3 major experimental domains of cognitive dissonance theory?
- Induced Compliance Paradigm
- Effort Justification Paradigm
- Free Choice Paradigm
Define/explain: effort justification paradigm
a research methodology used to test dissonance theory, arouses dissonance by getting people to invest time or energy to achieve a goal that may not be worthwhile, prediction is that participants would reduce dissonance by convincing themselves that the goal was actually worthwhile
Define/explain: free choice paradigm
a research methodology used to test dissonance theory, arouses dissonance by getting people to choose between 2 or more desirable alternatives, used to study postdecisional dissonance
Define/explain: impression management theory
an alternative to dissonance theory that argues that participants in dissonance experiments want to appear consistent to the experimenter and therefore lie about their attitudes
Define/explain: self-affirmation theory
an alternative to dissonance theory that argues that people are threatened by behaviour that challenges their self-worth, implies they are foolish/dishonest, and can deal with this threat by reaffirming an important value, people want to see themselves as honest, moral and capable
Define/explain: hypocrisy paradigm
a research methodology used to test dissonance theory, arouses dissonance by having people publicly promote a socially desirable behaviour and then be made aware that they have not always exhibited the behaviour themselves in the past, predict that dissonance aroused by hypocrisy would motivate individuals to change their behaviour to be more consistent with what they publicly promoted
Define/explain: preference for consistency (PFC) scale
a scale to measure differences in sensitivity to dissonance, a disposition that represents the extent to which people desire predictability and consistency within their own responses and within others’ responses, high scorers are more bothered than low scorers by ambivalent attitudes