Chapter 7 Flashcards

1
Q

A method of performance appraisal in which a supervisor is
given several behaviors and is
forced to choose which of them
is most typical of the employee.

A

Forced-choice rating scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A meeting between a supervisor and a subordinate for the purpose of discussing performance appraisal results (strengths and weaknesses).

A

Performance appraisal review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

10 steps in evaluating employee performance

A

Step 1: Determing the reason for evaluating employee performance
Step 2: dentify Environmental and Cultural Limitations
Step 3: Determine Who Will Evaluate Performance
Step 4: Select the Best Appraisal Methods to Accomplish your Goals
Step 5: Train Raters
Step 6: Observe and Document Performance
Step 7: Evaluate Performance
Step 9: Terminate Employees
Step 8: Communicate Appraisal Results to Employees
Step 10: Monitor the Legality and Fairness of the Appraisal
. System

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The idea that organizations tend to promote good employees until they reach the level at which they are not competent—in other words, their highest level of incompetence.

A

Peter Principle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A performance appraisal system in which feedback is obtained from multiple sources such as super- visors, subordinates, and peers.

A

360-degree feedback

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A performance appraisal strategy in which an employee receives feedback from sources (e.g., clients, subordinates, peers) other than just his or her supervisor.

A

Multiple-source feedback

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

most common source of performance appraisal

A

supervisor rating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  • It would not seem fair to pay a poor-performing employee the same amount
    as an excellently performing one. Thus, one important reason for evaluating
    employee performance is to provide a fair basis on which to determine an
    employee’s salary increase.
A

DETERMINING SALARY INCREASES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  • reason for evaluating performance is to determine which employees
    will be promoted. Although it would seem only fair to promote the best
    employee, this often does not occur
A

MAKING PROMOTION DECISIONS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When performance management techniques are not successful, the results of a performance review might suggest
that the best course of action is to terminate the employee.

A

MAKING TERMINATION DECISIONS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Employment tests must be validated, and one way this can be done is by correlating test scores with some measure of job performance.

A

CONDUCTING PERSONNEL RESEARCH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

For example, if supervisors are highly overworked, an elaborate, time-consuming performance appraisal system will not be successful

A

Step 2: Identify Environmental and Cultural Limitations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

also called upward feedback) is an important component of 360-degree feedback, as they can provide a very different view about a super- visor’s behavior.

A

Subordinate feedback

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

often see the actual behavior.their ratings usually come from employees who work directly with an employee; a bank teller could be rated by other bank tellers.

A

Peers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

they provide feedback on employee performance by filing com- plaints or complimenting a manager about one of her employees. Formally,they provide feedback by completing evaluation cards

A

Customers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Allowing an employee to evaluate his/her own
behavior and performance is a technique used by an
increasing number of organizations.

A

SELF APPRAISAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Introduce here the main concept that
this training course is aiming to impart to
the audience. Share how it will help them
in their role and responsibilities within
the company.

A

OUR TRAINING
OBJECTIVE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

concentrates on such employee attributes as dependability, honesty, and courtesy. Though commonly used, are not a good idea because they provide poor feedback and thus will not result in employee development and growth.

A

Trait-Focused Performance Dimensions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

concentrate on the employee’s knowledge, skills, and abilities. For example, might include writing skills, oral presentation skills, and driving skills.

A

Competency-Focused Performance Dimensions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

dimensions that are organized by the similarity of tasks that are performed.

A

Task-Focused Performance Dimensions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

is to organize the appraisal on the basis of goals to be accomplished by the employee.

A

Goal-Focused Performance Dimensions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

In recent years, psychologists have begun to study————, that is, the effort an employee makes to get along with peers, improve the organization, and perform tasks that are needed but are not necessarily an official part of the employee’s job description.

A

contextual performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

employees can be compared with one another instead of being rated
individually on a scale.

A

EMPLOYEE COMPARISONS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

ranked in order by
their judged
performance for each
relevant dimension

A

RANK ORDER

25
involves comparing each possible pair of employees and choosing which one of each pair is the better employee
PAIRED COMPARISONS
26
a predetermined percentage of employees are placed in each of the five categories
FORCED DISTRIBUTION METHOD
27
obtained by simply counting the number of relevant job behaviors that take place
QUANTITY OF WORK
28
measured in terms of errors, which are defined as deviations from a standard
QUALITY OF WORK
29
a predetermined percentage of employees are placed in each of the five categories
ATTENDANCE
30
employees who follow safety rules and who have no occupational accidents do not cost an organization as much money
SAFETY
31
the most commonly used option in evaluating performance is to have supervisors rate how well the employee performed on each dimension
RATINGS OF PERFORMANCE
32
scales are fairly simple, with 5 to 10 dimensions accompanied by words
GRAPHIC RATING SCALE
33
consist of a list of behaviors, expectations, or results for each dimension
BEHAVIORAL CHECKLIST
34
rate performance on a dimension by comparing the employee’s level of performance with that of other employees
COMPARISON WITH OTHER EMPLOYEES
35
behaviors can be rated based on the frequency with which they occur
FREQUENCY OF DESIRED BEHAVIORS
36
rate employees on the extent to which their behavior meets the expectations of the organization
EXTENT TO WHICH ORGANIZATIONAL EXPECTATIIONS ARE MET
37
provides raters with job- related information, practice in raing, and examples of ratings made by experts as well as the rationale behind those expert ratings made by experts as well as the rationale behind those expert ratings
FRAME- OF- REFERENCE TRAINING
38
THE NEXT STEP IN THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS IS FOR SUPERVISORS TO OBSERVE EMPLOYEE BEHAVIOR AND DOCUMENT CRITICAL INCIDENTS AS THEY OCCUR
STEP 6: OBSERVE AND DOCUMENT PERFORMANCE
39
DOCUMENTATION IS IMPORTANT FOR FOUR REASONS.
First, documentation forces a supervisor to focus on employee behaviors rather than traits and provides behavioral examples to use when reviewing performance ratings with employees. Second, documentation helps supervisors recall behaviors when they are evaluating performance. Third, documetation provides examples to use when reviewing performance ratings with employees. Fourth, documentation helps an organization defend against legal actions taken against it by an employee who was terminated or denied a raise or promotion.
40
A standardized use of the critical- incident technique developed at General Motors.
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE RECORD
41
After obtaining objective data, the supervisor should go back and read all of the critical incidents written for an employee. Reading these incidents should reduce errors of primacy, recency, and attention to unusual information.
SREADING CRITICAL-INCIDENT LOGS
42
Once critical-incident logs have been read and objective data reviewed, the supervisor is ready to assign performance appraisal ratings. While making these ratings, the supervisor must be careful not to make common rating errors involving distribution, halo, proximity, and contrast.
COMPLETING THE RATING FORM
43
TYPE OF RATING ERROR IN WHICH A RATER CONSISTENTLY GIVES ALL EMPLOYEES HIGH RATINGS, REGARDLESS OF THEIR ACTUAL LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE.
LENIENCY ERROR
44
TYPE OF RATING ERROR IN WHICH A RATER CONSISTENTLY RATES ALL EMPLOYEES IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SCALE, REGARDLESS OF THEIR ACTUAL LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE.
CENTRAL TENDENCY ERROR
45
TYPE OF RATING ERROR IN WHICH A RATER CONSISTENTLY GIVES ALL EMPLOYEES LOW RATINGS, REGARDLESS OF THEIR ACTUAL LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE.
STRICTNESS ERROR
46
Correlating the ratings for each dimension with those for the other dimensions. If they are highly correlated, halo error is often said to have occurred.
HALO ERROR
47
PROXIMITY ERROR
A rating made on one dimension affects the rating made on the dimension that immediately follows it on the rating scale.
48
The performance rating one person receives can be influenced by the performance of a previously evaluated person
CONTRAST ERROR
49
A type of rating error in which raters base their rating of an employee during one rating period on the ratings the rater gave during a previous period.
ASSIMILATION
50
Thee negative feedback is sandwiched between positive feedback.
Feedback Sandwich
51
The opinion of courts in most states that employers have the right to hire and fire an employee at will and without any specific cause.
Employment-at-Will Doctrine
52
An employee can be fired only for cause—for example, breaking a rule, demonstrating an inability to perform.
State Law
53
Employees cannot be fired for reasons protected by federal or state law. For example, an employer cannot fire an employee because she is female, pregnant, nonwhite, or over the age of 40.
Provisions of federal or state law
54
Employers cannot terminate an employee for exercising a legal duty such as jury duty or refusing to violate the law or professional ethics.
Public policy/interest
55
If an individual employee has a signed employment contract stipulating a particular period of employment, an organization cannot fire the employee without cause.
Contracts
56
Employment-at-will is nullified if an employer implies that an employee “has a job for life” or can be fired only for certain reasons.
Implied contracts
57
Though employers are generally free to hire and fire at will, the courts have ruled that employers must still act in good faith and deal fairly with an employee.
Covenants of good faith and fair dealing
58
employees are given a probationary period in which to prove that they can perform well. Employees can be terminated more easily during the probationary period than at any other time.
PROBATIONARY PERIOD
59
employees are given a probationary period in which to prove that they can perform well. Employees can be terminated more easily during the probationary period than at any other time.
INABILITY TO PERFORM