Chapter 4 - Process of assurance: Evidence and reporting Flashcards
When describing a analytic procedure what 3 parts is it broken into?
VERB + WHO/WHAT + WHY
VERB = AIRCORE
What is the primary objective of obtaining evidence in an assurance engagement?
To enable practitioners to express an opinion (if FS is T +F) on whether the subject of the assurance engagement is in line with the identified criteria.
Define ‘Audit Evidence’
Audit evidence is the information the auditor uses to arrive at conclusions and support their opinion on the financial statements.
What are the two main types of audit tests?
1) Tests of Controls: Testing the procedure.
Evaluate the effectiveness of controls - can they prevent, detect or correct material misstatements at the assertion level
2) Substantive Procedures: Testing the number.
Detect material misstatements directly through testing details or performing analytical procedures. Broken down into test of details and substantive analytical procedure
What is a test of controls? (3)
Type of audit test
Test the procedure
Audit procedures designed to evaluate the operating effectiveness of controls in preventing, or detecting and correcting material misstatements at the assertion level.
What is substantive procedures?
Type of audit test
Test the number itself
Audit procedures designed to detect material misstatements at the assertion level. Substantive procedures comprise:
Tests of details (of classes of transactions, account balances and disclosures). e.g. agree a number does the invite and other documents match if we recalculate this.
Substantive analytical procedures.
What is a tests of details?
Type of substantive procedure which is an audit test
Tests of details (of classes of transactions, account balances and disclosures). e.g. agree a number does the invite and other documents match if we recalculate this.
When is control testing preferred in an audit?
Control testing is preferred when internal controls are strong, allowing auditors to place reliance on them and reduce the extent of substantive testing required.
Auditors will rely on these controls
IC Strong = Less substantive testing
What should an auditor do if internal controls are weak?
If controls are weak, the auditor must increase substantive testing to compensate for the higher risk of fraud or error.
Auditors will not rely on these controls, have less faith
IC Weak = More substantive testing
These weakness are reported in the management letter along with suggestions
Where do auditors report any internal control weaknesses?
These weakness are reported in the management letter along with suggestions
Are substantive tests required on all audits?
Substantive tests are performed on all audits. It is just the level of substantive testing that changes. It is never appropriate to just do tests of control and no substantive testing.
According to ISA 500 (UK & Ireland), what must auditors obtain in terms of evidence?
Auditors must obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to form reasonable conclusions that support their opinion.
What factors determine the sufficiency of audit evidence?
Sufficiency is influenced by risk assessment, control adequacy, materiality, and the auditor’s previous experience with the client.
If there is a low materiality, what does this mean in regards to our testing?
Low materiality = High risk = More testing
If there are weak controls, what does this mean in regards to our testing?
Weak controls = More testing
If there was an issue with our previous year audit testing, what does this mean in regards to our testing this year?
Issues with previous year testing = More testing
What are key attributes of ‘appropriate’ audit evidence?
Appropriate evidence must be both RELEVANT to the assertion being tested and RELIABLE, with a preference for external over internal sources, written over oral, and original documents over copies.
Define RELEVANT in regards to appropriate audit evidence (2)
- Does it relate to the assertion being tested?
- Is it measuring what it should be?
Define RELIABLE in regards to appropriate audit evidence (4)
- Can we trust it
- Written over oral
- Original documents over copies
- Order of preferred evidence, as no bias and nothings been tampered:
1. External over internal sources - 3rd party
2. Auditor generated
3. Client generated
What are some methods to get evidence for gathering procedures?
AIRCORE
Analytical Procedures – evaluation of financial information by studying possible relationships among financial and non-financial data
Inspection – of a document such as an invoice
RecalcUlation – check the mathematical accuracy of a document - numbers
Confirmation – relates to evidence from a third party source
Observation – of a process such as an inventory count - better for checking IC
Reperformance – verification managements approach by the auditor - action
Enquiry – ask a relevant person for information
What is AIRCORE?
Methods to get evidence for gathering procedures
Analytical Procedures – evaluation of financial information by studying possible relationships among financial and non-financial data
Inspection – of a document such as an invoice
RecalcUlation – check the mathematical accuracy of a document - numbers
Confirmation – relates to evidence from a third party source
Observation – of a process such as an inventory count - better for checking IC
Reperformance – verification managements approach by the auditor - action
Enquiry – ask a relevant person for information
What does the A stand for in AIRCORE
What are some weaknesses of this procedure?
Methods to get evidence for gathering procedures
Analytical Procedures – evaluation of financial information by studying possible relationships among financial and non-financial data
- Still an estimate
- Bias (design a procedure that helps me get a certain figure)
- Good understanding of client needs e.g. how of we know what the annual % pay rise is
- Time consuming
- If 1st year being audited there’s no comparisons
- Multiple reasons behind differences
What does the I stand for in AIRCORE
What are some weaknesses of this procedure?
Methods to get evidence for gathering procedures
Inspection – of a document such as an invoice
- Fake invoice
- Tampered with
- Lost
- Could be borrowed e.g. an asset - van
- Lack of the physical detail you need
What does the R’s stand for in AIRCORE
What are some weaknesses of this procedure?
Methods to get evidence for gathering procedures
RecalcUlation – check the mathematical accuracy of a document - numbers
Reperformance – verification managements approach by the auditor - action
- Human error
- Accuracy vs correctness e.g. interest being told 5% so all adds up but document says it should be 5% therefore its not correct