Chapter 1 - Concept of and Need for Assurance Flashcards
Assurance has two big classifications - name them and provide examples
- Audit of financial statements
+ ve pinion - the f/s are true and fair - Other Assurance Engagements
-ve opinion - nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that what we reviewed was misstated.
Internal Control Review
Corporate Governance Practices
Financial Statements Review
PFI (Prospective Financial Information) e.g. budgets, cashflows, forecasts
Assurance - definition
Assurance could be described as an assurance firm’s satisfaction as to the reliability of an assertion being made by one party for the use of another party. This assurance is expressed in an “assurance report” with a negative or positive conclusion given.
Assurance engagement - definition
An assurance engagement is one in which a practitioner expresses a conclusion designed to enhance the degree of confidence of the intended users other than the responsible party about the outcome of the evaluation or measurement of a subject matter against criteria.
Independently verifying to give comfort to general public
The key elements of an assurance engagement are as follows:
- Three party relationship
(i) The practitioner - gives assurance e.g. auditor
(ii) The intended users - who the report goes to e.g. member/shareholders
(iii) The responsible party (for preparing subject matter and criteria) e.g. director - A subject matter (financial statements / internal controls / corporate governance etc)
- Suitable criteria
e.g. F/S= In an audit IFRS/IAS/Companies Act
e.g. IC = Client Doc Controls
e.g. CG = UK code of CG - Sufficient (enough) appropriate(supports subject matter) evidence to support the assurance opinion
- A written report providing an opinion on the subject matter
What are the key elements of an assurance engagement? (5)
The key elements of an assurance engagement are as follows:
- Three party relationship
(i) The practitioner - gives assurance e.g. auditor
(ii) The intended users - who the report goes to e.g. member/shareholders
(iii) The responsible party (for preparing subject matter and criteria) e.g. director - A subject matter (financial statements / internal controls / corporate governance etc)
- Suitable criteria (my benchmark e.g. companies act 2006, IFRS)
- Sufficient (ENOUGH) appropriate (RIGHT TYPE) evidence to support the assurance opinion
- A written report providing an opinion on the subject matter
Two types of assurance engagement?
- Reasonable Assurance
- High
- Sufficient and appropriate
- Very intrusive
- AEIOU = Analytic procedures, Enquiry, Inspection, Observation, Recalculation
- Fraud and error stands a reasonable chance of detection
- Assertive Positive/UnModified Opinion e.g. The financial statements show a true and fair view in all material respects
- High Risk for auditor
- If FS are not true and fair this is an unmodified opinion - Limited Assurance
- Low
- Sufficient and appropriate
- Less intrusive
- AE = Analytic procedures, Enquiry
- Negative Opinion /Modified Opinion e.g. Nothing has come to our attention that make us believe that the subject matter is misstated
- Low Risk for auditor
Note: It is not practical to give absolute assurance (ie 100%) assurance
Can you ever give an absolute assurance?
It is not practical to give absolute assurance (ie 100%) assurance
Absolute assurance is impractical due to factors like:
- Sampling limitations: Auditors don’t test every transaction. A sampling approach is used.
- Reliance on internal controls: Controls may have inherent weaknesses. e.g. accounting system limitations and also client staff members may collude in fraud which can then be deliberately hidden from the auditor or misrepresent matters to them for the same purpose.
- Nature of the financial statements
. The fact that most audit evidence is persuasive rather than conclusive.
. The fact that some items in the subject matter may be estimates and are therefore uncertain.
It is impossible to conclude absolutely that judgemental estimates are correct.
- Quality of auditor judgements: The fact that assurance provision can be subjective and professional judgements have to be made (for example, about what aspects of the subject matter are the most important, how much evidence to obtain, etc).
What is Reasonable Assurance (5)
- High
- Sufficient and appropriate
- Very intrusive
- AEIOU = Analytic procedures, Enquiry, Inspection, Observation, Recalculation
- Fraud and error stands a reasonable chance of detection
- Assertive Positive/UnModified Opinion e.g. The financial statements show a true and fair view in all material respects
- High Risk for auditor
- If FS are not true and fair this is an unmodified opinion
What is Limited Assurance (5)
- Limited Assurance
- Low
- Sufficient and appropriate
- Less intrusive
- AE = Analytic procedures, Enquiry
- Negative Opinion /Modified Opinion e.g. Nothing has come to our attention that make us believe that the subject matter is misstated
- Low Risk for auditors
Differentiate between reasonable and limited assurance
Reasonable assurance provides a positive opinion based on sufficient evidence, while limited assurance offers a negative conclusion with less intrusive evidence.
Examples of assurance engagements and who are the regulators (4) What type of assurance engagement are these? (1)
Bank audits - required by FCA
Pension scheme audits - required by FCA
Charity audits - required by charity commission
Solicitors’ audits - required by SRA
This is a limited assurance engagement
Examples of assurance engagements voluntary engagements (6) What type of assurance engagement are these? (1)
Environmental audits - CSR reports
Due diligence (where a report is requested on an acquisition target)
Internal audit - outsourced
Fraud investigations- outsourced
Internal control reports - processes or procedures assigned to prevent.detect fraud and error
Reports on business plans or projections - cashflow forecasts
Different levels of assurance will be given for different assurance engagements. For example, only limited assurance could be given for a report on a business plan as the data contained in that document would be based on forecast figures.
This is a limited assurance engagement
When reviewing a cashflow forecast will you give a positive or negative or can it be either opinion?
Different levels of assurance will be given for different assurance engagements. For example, only limited assurance could be given for a report on a business plan as the data contained in that document would be based on forecast figures.
Always negative as it is limited
These are a prediction
What are the requirements to undergo a statutory audit?
In the UK, all companies of a certain size must have an audit by law (companies act 2006) - for this current and last financial year
- An annual turnover/revenue of more than £10.2 million
- Assets (NCA and CA) worth more than £5.1 million
- 50 or more employees on average
What makes a company exempt from audit?
2 or more of the below - SET BY COMPANIES ACT 2006 - for this current and last financial year
- An annual turnover/revenue no more than £10.2 million
- Assets (NCA + CA) worth no more than £5.1 million
- 50 or fewer employees on average
Why might directors manipulate financial statements?
- Have an incentive to manipulate
- Bonuses
- Salary
- Reputation
- Keep job
Define True and Fair
No official definition but here is the generally accepted ones
True: Information is factual and conforms with reality, not false. In addition the information conforms with required standards and law. The accounts have been correctly extracted from the books and records.
Fair: Information is free from discrimination and bias in compliance with expected standards and rules. The accounts should reflect the commercial substance of the company’s underlying transactions.
What is an RSB? (1) Give an example (1) What are they responsible for ensuring? (2)
Recognised Supervisory Body (RSB)
The Companies Act 2006 requires that auditors are members of a RSB. The ICAEW is an RSB. ICAS (Scotland), CAI (Ireland)
Ensure auditors are competent
The RSB is responsible for ensuring:
- Only Individuals holding an appropriate qualification or Firms controlled by qualified persons can conduct audits
- Those individuals or firms are monitored on a regular basis (CPD - continual professional development)
ISA (UK)
International Standards on Auditing