Chapter 4: Commencing and Serving Proceedings Flashcards
Parties to proceedings
A decision must be made about who a claim is being brought against. The claim form must include the full name of each party and therefore proper consideration will need to be made about who the parties are and how they should be referred to in the claim. Individuals will be referred to using their full unabbreviated name and title (for example, Mr Stephen James Smith), but how should you refer to a party if it is a partnership, a sole trader, an LLP or a company?
1.1 Partnerships
Claims are brought against a partnership where there are two or more people who:
* Were partners (claiming to be entitled as partners or alleged to be partners); and
* Carried on the partnership business at the time when the cause of action accrued.
CPR 7.2A and 7A PD 5A provide that, if a claim is being brought against a partnership, claims must be brought against the name under which a partnership carried on business at the time the cause of action accrued unless it is inappropriate to do so. Examples of where it may be
inappropriate could include partnerships where there have been multiple changes of the name of
the partnership or multiple mergers so that it is clearer to identify the partners by their individual
names.
Partnerships
This is a rule that aids convenience in the proceedings because the use of the firm name is merely
shorthand for listing partners individually; the partnership is not a separate legal entity.
Therefore, generally, claims will be brought in or against the name of the partnership.
If it seems likely that it will be necessary to seek enforcement of judgment against the partners’
personal assets, as well as the partnership assets, it is useful to name the parties personally to
avoid any argument at the enforcement stage. A compromise solution is to use the partnership’s
name and to set out the individual names of the partners
Full name for a partnership
The full name for a partnership (other than an LLP) will be the full name by which the partnership
is known where partners are being sued in the name of the partnership, or the full unabbreviated names of each partner where the partners are being sued as individuals (although see note above about suing in the partnership name). For example:
At the time the cause of action is acrued
The partnership name must be the name at the time the cause of action accrued; if the
partnership dissolves before proceedings are issued, the claim is made against the former
partners in the name of the dissolved firm.
A claim can also be brought against a business name as if it were the name of a partnership if a
claim is brought against an individual who carries on business within the jurisdiction in a name
other than that individual’s own name (CPR 7A PD 5C).
For sole traders, commonly both the individual and trading name will be used when describing a
party to the claim. For example:
Example: Sole traders
John Flagstone (trading as John’s Café)
For sole traders, commonly both the individual and trading name will be used when describing a
party to the claim. For example:
Example: Sole traders
John Flagstone (trading as John’s Café)
1.3 LLPs
An LLP is a separate legal entity distinct from its members (for example, it can hold property,
employ people and enter into contractual obligations). The members of an LLP have limited
liability because the LLP is liable for all its debts to the full extent of its assets. [Note that theimpact for its members is that they have contributed to the LLP’s assets and risk losing that amount should the creditors claim those assets].
Almost all LLPs will contract with their clients on the basis that the contract is with the LLP and that clients agree ‘not to sue members personally’. Therefore, in the case of an LLP registered in England and Wales, the claim would be brought against the full registered name, including the
suffix LLP, for example:
1.4 Companies
As the claim form must include the full name of each party, for a company registered in England
and Wales this is the full registered name, including the suffix (such as plc or limited), if any. For
example, Example: Company
Rockstone Limited
A company may be represented at trial by an employee if:
- The employee has been authorised to do so by the company and
- The court gives permission
1.5 Trusts and deceased persons
1.5.1 Trusts
A claim can be brought by or against trustees, executors or administrators. It is not necessary to
add the beneficiaries of the trust or estate as parties to the claim (CPR 19.7A). Any order made in
the claim is binding on the beneficiaries (unless the court orders otherwise).
1.5.2 Deceased persons
Where a person who had an interest in a claim has died and that person has no personal
representative the court may order CPR 19.8(1):
* The claim to proceed in the absence of a person representing the estate of the deceased; or
* A person to be appointed to represent the estate of the deceased.
Where a defendant against whom a claim could have been brought has died CPR 19.8(2):
- If a grant of probate or administration has been made, the claim must be brought against the
persons who are the personal representatives of the deceased. - If a grant of probate or administration has not been made:
the claim must be brought against ‘the estate of’ the deceased; and - the claimant must apply to the court for an order appointing a person to represent the estate of the deceased in the claim.
1.6 Children and protected parties
Claimants are legally incapable of pursuing claims on their own behalf if they are a child or a protected party. Therefore, CPR 21 contains special provisions which apply in relation to children and protected parties
Definition of child and protected party
Child: Any person under the age of 18 years (CPR 21.1(2))
Protected party: Any person who lacks capacity to conduct the proceedings within the
meaning of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. This means that by reason of impairment or
disturbance of the brain or mind, the party is unable to make the decision in question at the
time it needs to be made (CPR 21.2(1)).
Presumption of capacity
A person of adult age is presumed to have ‘capacity’ until the contrary is proved. The burden of proving the contrary rests with whoever asserts incapacity. The legal advisors must be satisfied that a party is capable of understanding, with the assistance
of such proper explanation from legal advisers (and experts if required), the issues on which the party’s content or decision is likely to be necessary during the proceedings.
In determining the issue of incapacity, the legal advisers should ask (Martin Masterman-Lister v (1)
Brutton & Co (2) Jewell & Home Counties Dairies [2002] EWCA Civ 1889):
Can the person recognise the problem they encounter?
* Can the person explain with sufficient clarity the problem to those from whom they seek
appropriate advice?
* Can the person understand and evaluate the advice received from an appropriate source?
* Can the person understand the effects of choosing one course of action over another and give
effect to their chosen course through instruction?
Determining the issue of capacity
In practice, the legal advisors must satisfy themselves that the party has the requisite capacity to
bring or defend proceedings. Quite often this may involve an assessment and report by the party’s GP. If there are legitimate concerns that a client does not have legal capacity to deal with the case, advice may have to be sought from a psychologist or psychiatrist. The court may also
require the personal evidence of the solicitor or family and friends.
In determining the issue of incapacity, the legal advisers should ask (Martin Masterman-Lister v (1)
Brutton & Co (2) Jewell & Home Counties Dairies [2002] EWCA Civ 1889)
In practice, the legal advisors must satisfy themselves that the party has the requisite capacity to
bring or defend proceedings. Quite often this may involve an assessment and report by the
party’s GP. If there are legitimate concerns that a client does not have legal capacity to deal with
the case, advice may have to be sought from a psychologist or psychiatrist. The court may also
require the personal evidence of the solicitor or family and friends.
1.6.1 Who is a litigation friend?
Children and protected parties are represented in civil proceedings by a litigation friend whether they are commencing or defending the proceedings (CPR 21.2). A person may act as a litigation friend (with or without a court order) provided they CPR 21.4(3):
* Can fairly and competently conduct proceedings on behalf of the child or protected party.
* Have no adverse interest to that of the child or protected party; and
* Where the child or protected party is a claimant, undertakes to pay any costs which the child or protected party may be ordered to pay in relation to the proceedings, subject to any right he may have to be repaid from the assets of the child or protected party
1.6.2 Appointment of a litigation friend
The litigation friend is often a relative or a person the court has appointed to act on the party’s behalf. Often appointments for a litigation friend are made without court order by filing and serving of a
certificate of suitability demonstrating that the litigation friend satisfies the criteria in CPR 21.4(3) either at the time the claim is made (if the child or protected party is the claimant) or when the
child takes the first step in the proceedings (if the child or the protected party is the defendant). If
a court order is required, a specific procedure must be followed (CPR 21.6).
1.6.2 Appointment of a litigation friend
Alternatively, for a protected party, the Court of Protection may appoint someone to conduct proceedings on the protected party’s behalf (CPR 21.4(2)). The court may also make an order permitting the child to conduct proceedings without a litigation
friend (CPR 21.2(3)).
1.6.3 Service on children and protected parties
There are special provisions for the service of documents on children and protected parties (CPR
6.25).
Any document due to be served on a child or a protected party must be served on the litigation
friend. (For an application for an order to appoint a litigation friend there are different service
provisions (CPR 21.8)).
Children and protected parties should be referred to in the title to proceedings on documents (21
PD 1.1 and 1.2):
A child is referred to in the claim form as being represented by his/her litigation friend for
example
1.7 Summary
- It is important to refer to the correct parties in the claim form when starting a claim and this will differ according to whether the party is an individual, a partnership, a sole trader, an LLP or a company.
- Claims can be brought against trusts and deceased persons.
- Children and protected parties do not have capacity to pursue claims on their own behalf and therefore they must be represented by a litigation friend.
- A person may act as a litigation friend if they can fairly and competently conduct proceedings
on behalf of the child or protected party, have no adverse interest to that of the child or protected party and where the child or protected party is a claimant, undertake to pay any costs which the child or protected party may be ordered to pay in relation to the proceedings.
2 Where and how to issue the claim
Once the claimant has decided to bring a claim it must:
(a) decide in which court to issue the claim; and
(b) issue the proceedings in that court.
This section covers these two areas
2.1 Which court?
The courts, their specialist divisions and the judges sitting in different courts are explained in the
chapter dealing with the civil court system. That information must be considered when deciding in
which court to issue.
There are two principal types of civil court in England and Wales:
* the High Court; and
* the County Court.
The High Court and County Court have concurrent jurisdiction over most claims, which means
that the claimant often has a choice when deciding in which of these courts to issue their claim.
This is explained in a little more detail below.
2.1.1 Jurisdiction of the County Court and the High Court
A claim can only be brought in a court if that court has jurisdiction to deal with the matter ie the power to deal with the claim. As mentioned above, the High Court and County Court have concurrent jurisdiction over most claims. The jurisdiction thresholds of each respective court are summarised below (see High Court and County Courts Jurisdiction Order 1991, CPR 7 and PD 7A)
2.1.2 Rules governing commencement (CPR 7)
As summarised by the diagram:
* If the value of a claim (other than claims for personal injury) is greater than £100,000, it may be commenced in either the High Court or the County Court (7APD2.1).
* If the value of the claim is £100,000 or less, it may not be commenced in the High Court and should be commenced in the County Court.
* The figure for personal injury claims is less than £50,000 (7APD2.2)
The value of a claim is its financial worth (CPR 16.3(6)).
You should disregard:
(a) interest;
(b) costs;
(c) any counterclaim;
(d) any contributory negligence; and
(e) any deduction of social security benefits.
If the claim form is to be issued in the High Court it must state that the claimant expects to
recover more than £100,000 (CPR 16.3(5)).
2.1.3 Approach if there is a choice of court
The guidelines for deciding which court the claim should be brought in are contained in 7A PD. The
claim should be commenced where it is likely to be tried.
A claim should be started in the High Court if by reason of:
(a) the financial value of the claim and the amount in dispute, and/or
(b) the complexity of the facts, legal issues, remedies or procedures involved, and/or
(c) the importance of the outcome of the claim to the public in general,
the claimant believes that the claim ought to be dealt with by a High Court judge (7A PD 2.4)