CHAPTER 3.2 Flashcards

1
Q

It refers to the good relation between the interviewer and the interviewee, which is conducive to a fruitful result.

A

RAPPORT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The appearance of the interviewer and other qualities such as skills of communication techniques or the forces of his language is the mainstays of the strength of his character.

A

FORCEFUL PERSONALITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

This will help the interviewer to determine the personality and intelligence of his subjects

A

KNOWLEDGE ON PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The interviewer must know how to appropriately use his voice normally, without
unusual loudness that may affect the interview process.

A

CONVERSATIONAL TONE OF VOICE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

He must possess the qualities of an actor, salesman and psychologist and know
how to use the power of persuasion.

A

ACTING QUALITIES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

He must be courteous, sympathetic and humble, ready to ask apologies for the
inconvenience of the interview

A

HUMILITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

witness who lack the courage to face the suspect, his associates or relatives

A

FEAR OF REPRISAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the witness maybe an acquaintance, friend, helper or benefactor of the suspect

A

BECAUSE OF BIAS OF WITNESS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

there are witnesses who are shy and they shun
publicity that will bring discomfort to their ordinary or obscure way of living.

A

AVOIDANCE OF PUBLICITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

some famous and respected families preserve their
reputations by instilling to their members the need of the approval of the elders on matter affecting their families.

A

FAMILY RESTRICTION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

this is a reluctant type of witnesses. It is found among the uneducated and of low level of intelligence.

A

KNOW-NOTHING TYPE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

this refers to an uncooperative and indifferent subject. To deal with them is to find out their field of interest so that they will talk

A

DISINTERESTED TYPE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

the style of questioning by the investigator should be adapted to the psychology of the subject.

A

THE DRUNKEN TYPE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

this is a witness who is prone to exaggerate, adding irrelevant or new matters to their narration

A

TALKATIVE TYPE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

this is the truthful and cooperative witness where the investigator could rely upon, with little or no problem in handling them

A

HONEST WITNESS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

this is a liar type of witness. Let him lie and order him to repeat several times their narration.

A

DECEITFUL WITNESS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

this is a shy witness. The approach must be friendly and reassuring confidentiality of their information.

A

TIMID WITNESS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

this is the most difficult subject to deal with

A

REFUSAL TO TALK WITNESS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Is the vigorous and confrontational questioning of a reluctant suspect about his participation in the commission of crime.

A

INTERROGATION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

This is the heart of the interrogation.

A

Questioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the MAIN PURPOSE OF INTERROGATION?

A

to obtain CONFESSION or ADMISSION from the suspect

22
Q

is the direct acknowledgement of guilt.

A

CONFESSION

23
Q

is indirect acknowledgment of guilt

24
Q

this is a technique where the investigator, combining the skills of an actor and a psychologist, addresses the suspect with an emotional appeal
to confess.

A

EMOTIONAL APPEAL

25
the investigator, in his preliminary or probing questions must dig deep into the past troubles, plight and unfortunate events in the life of the suspect. An offer of help, kindness, friendliness may win his cooperation.
SYMPATHETIC APPROACH
26
a friendly approach coupled with a posture of sincerity may induce the suspect to confess
FRIENDLINESS
27
the investigator bluffs the suspect that even if he will not confess, there is enough evidence to send him to jail.
Pretense of Solid Evidence
28
the weakest link maybe used to fake pain and agony by ordering him to shout, accompanied by banging a chair on the wall to make it appear that a commotion is going on.
Drama
29
the suspect could be tricked that the investigator had gone to the residence and the family members had supplied facts against the suspect
Feigning Contact with Family Members
30
the complainant, witness or victim is requested to point positively to the suspect
Line Up
31
The suspect is placed among other persons in a line up and he is identified by several complainants and witnesses who will associate the suspect in other several crimes.
Reverse Line-Up
32
the investigator demands immediate response personality towards the suspect
Stern Approach
33
in the questioning process, the investigator selects the right moment to shout as pertinent question in an apparent righteous outrage
Jolting
34
the first set of investigators must appear to be rough, mean and dangerous. The second investigator intervenes by stopping the first set of investigators. By being sympathetic and understanding, he begins his interrogation.
Mutt and Jeff or Sweet and Sour Method
35
the person who performs skillful questioning of hostile witness and suspects for purposes of obtaining confession or admission
INTERROGATOR
36
this points to the subject of interrogation whether a suspect or a victim.
INTERROGEE
37
denotes any person associated to the commission of a crime
SUSPECT
38
is a person who is requested to give information concerning an incident
WITNESSES
39
It is the process of applying instruments or tools of the police sciences in criminal investigation and detection.
INSTRUMENTATION
40
He is a Frenchman who founded criminal identification by body measurement.
Alphonse Bertillon
41
Dactyloscopy replaced Anthropometry. It was popularized by
Sir Edward Richard Henry in Europe
42
who founded the fingerprint classification
Juan Vucetich
43
the agglutination of human blood; This discovery demonstrated that blood possesses certain characteristics
Forensic Serology
44
Forensic Serology was discovered by
Karl Landsteiner in 1901
45
a U.S. Army Physician with a rank of Lieutenant Colonel.
Dr. Calvin H. Goddard
46
It is used for determining whether or not the evidence bullet and test bullet came from a single gun through the use of bullet comparison microscope
Forensic Ballistics
47
one of the foremost criminalists in the world
Edmond Locard
48
deals with the identification of sweat pores, he proved that pores vary in number, size and position in each individual.
Poroscopy
49
Poroscopy founded by
Edmond Locard
50
It is effective in limiting the suspects in number as in the hand of an expert and dependable machine its result is excellent.
Polygraph
51
Polygraph (lie detector) was develop by; founded by;
John Larson; Keller
52
a British biologist and genetics expert, discovered the concept of DNA genetic fingerprinting.
Alec Jeffreys (1984)