Chapter 3: Perceiving individuals Flashcards

1
Q

mental representations

A

a body of knowledge an individual has stored in their memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

‘What is beautiful is good’ heuristic

A

We attribute more positive qualities to attractive people.
Mainly in social and intellectual competence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

baby face - males

A

associated with being more naive, honest, kind and warm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

mature facial features - males

A

associated with leadership qualities, dominance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can people perceive lies well?

A

No, only a 54% of correct answers. Only a tiny bit better than chance.
Paying attention to diagnostic hints helps (quivering, high-pitched voice)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

familiarity and liking

A

people are more likely to like someone through familiarity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

environments and impressions

A

By looking at (online) environments people occupy people can form a pretty accurate impression of someone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

salience

A

The cue’s ability to attract attention in its context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

overgeneralisation emotion system

A

personality impressions of faces are drive by an oversensitive emotion detection system.
(Biggest influence in making an impression)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Women vs men in attractiveness

A

Attractive men are seen as more competent
Attractive women are not they have been selected on appearance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Self-fulfilling prophecy of expectations

A

By expecting something we start acting like it which in turn influences the other to act more like our expectation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

elaboration spectrum

A

-thoughtless-
associative processes
Heuristic: ‘What is beautiful is good’
systematic & analytical processing
-thoughtful-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

covariation theory on attributions

A

to determine to what you can make an attribution we look at 3 things:
- consensus
- distinctiveness
- consistency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

consensus

A

Do other people also do this in the same situation?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

distinctiveness

A

Does the person also do this in other situations?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

consistency

A

Does the person do this the whole time?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Distinctiveness - low
consensus - low
consistency - high

A

attribution: person as a cause

18
Q

Distinctiveness - high
consensus - high
consistency - high

A

attribution: object/action/statement as a cause

19
Q

Distinctiveness - low
consensus - high
consistency - low

A

attribution: context/environment as a cause

20
Q

2 ways to interpret cues

A

through associations and through thoughts currently on our mind

21
Q

accessibility

A

the ease and speed with which information is used and comes to mind

22
Q

priming

A

the activation of a mental representation to increase its accessibility and thus the likelihood that it will be used. can be unaware and last up to 24 hours

23
Q

subliminal presentation

A

presentation of stimuli in such a way that perceivers are unaware of them

24
Q

correspondent inference

A

the process of characterizing someone as having a personality trait that corresponds to their behavior

25
3 conditions for correspondent inferences to hold true:
- voluntary behavior - behavior has an unique effect - behavior is unexpected
26
correspondence bias
the tendency to infer a persons personal characteristics from observed behaviors even when the inference is unjustified because other possible causes of the behavior exist
27
limits correspondence bias
- when people pay specific attention to the situation - (collectivist) cultures
28
superficial processing
relying on accessible information to make inferences or judgements while expending little effort in processing
29
systematic processing
giving thorough effortful consideration to a wide range of information relevant to a judgement
30
2 requirements for systematic processing:
- (type of) motivation - ability to process thoroughly (time, tranquility)
31
causal attributions
judgement about the cause of a behavior or an event
32
discounting
reducing belief in one potential cause of behavior because there is another viable cause
33
systematic processing 3 steps:
- interpreting behavior - characterizing the person - causal reasoning to the correct impression (only this step needs conscious effort)
34
conservatism principle
unless we use systematic processing we stick to our first impressions even when these were made in bias
35
primacy effect
early encountered information has a greater impact than subsequent information (example: conservatism)
36
perseverance bias
the tendency for information to have a persisting effect on our judgement even after it has been discredited
37
how to reduce falling for bias:
consider the opposite
38
limits self-fulfilling prophecy
- when the perceived has strong views about themselves - target is aware of perceivers expectations - target makes sure to give accurate impression instead of maintaining a smooth conversation
39
why are biases handy in our life anyway?
- no big need for accuracy - behavior often reflects personality - correspondent inferences are often accurate ALL in attempt to understand others
40
confirmation bias
people usually selectively look for information to confirm previous impressions
41
types of motivation:
- motivation to form an accurate impression - motivation for connection and self-protection
42
what information do we give more weight?
negative information, initial information