Chapter 2-The research process: components and language of research reports Flashcards

1
Q

what are the 4 major sections of a research report

A

-the problem or introduction—describes the gap in knowledge that will be addressed in the research study
o Methods—describes the process of implementing the research study
o Results
o Conclusions—describes the decisions or determinations that can be made about the research problem.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what section of a research report would you look in for the implications of the findings for practice

do healthcare providers often end or begin with this section. why?

A

the conclusion

HCP begin reading a research report from the conclusion because it contains the implications (telling them if it is useful or not)
o Another reason it is read first is that it has fewer unique research terms than the rest of the rport (less complex language)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

o What is different about conclusions in research reports from other reports?

A

research reports contain either new knowledge or confirmation of previous knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is a limitation and what sectin should it be included in

A

o Limitations—aspects of how the study was conducted that create uncertainty concerning the conclusion that can be derived from the study as well as the deisions that can be based on it (often address the sampling ormethods)

it should be found in the conclusions along with the cautions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what should the conclusions contain-

A

-limitations or cautions
-the findings and not JUST the findings but also how they are relevant to practice
o usually contains recommendatiosn for future research regarding the problem of interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

which section should this info go in

o Summarizes the specific findings from the study in a condensed manner

A

results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

defn of data

A

o Data—the information collected in a study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what does data analysis accomplish and not do

A

o Organzing and compiling data is data analysis. It pulls elements of info together to present clear picture of info collected, but it doesn’t interpret or describe the implications for practice of that picture of the information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

themes in relation to results of research report

A

abstractions that refect phrases, words or ideas that appear repeatedly wen a researcher analyzes what people have said a bout a particular thing. It summarizes and synthesizes discrete ideas or phrases to create a picture from the words collected in the research study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what type of results re these examples of

the number of people in a study, avg age of participants, percentage who responded in specifc manner. Standard deviation and mean

A

descriptive results—summarize info without comparing it with other info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

defn of significance and why it is important for people reading research

A

 Significance—is a statistical term indicating a low likelihood that any differences or relationship found in a study happened by hance (imp because we often take small studies and apply them to lg pt populations and we must rule out the possibility of chance)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

defn of p value and what a p value of .05 means

A

by p values—these indicate what percentage of the time the results reported would have happened by chance alone eg p of .05 means that in 5/100 times youd expect to get the results by chance alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the difference between results and conclusions

A

results are a summary of the actual findings or info collected in the research study
conclusions summarize the potential meaning, decisions or determinations that can be made based on the info collected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

t or f data analysis interprets and describes the implications for practice of that picture of the information

A

DOESNT interpret or describe the implications for practice of that picture of the information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is this?

abstractions that refect phrases, words or ideas that appear repeatedly wen a researcher analyzes what people have said a bout a particular thing

A

themes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what could you use for the computation of a correlation statistic to look for connections between variable

A

significance and p values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

If p value is given fr the correlation between two variables as P .01

A

this tells us the connection found between these two scores would happen by chance alone in <1% of samples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

multivariate what does this mean and what must be written about it

A

indicates the study reports findings for 3 or more factors and includes the relationships among those different factors

in the book they also used an example of only 2??

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what is logistic regression

A

a statistical procedure that allows us to look at relationships between more than two factors and test whether those relationships are likely to occur by chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

do you use the results or the methods section to understand what was implemented in a study and who was studied

A

methods for a more complete version

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

which kind of method eg quantitative, qual, mixed

Focus on subjective info and never try to control or predict the phenomenon of interest

A

qualitative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

which method

focus on understanding and breaking down the phenomenon into parts to see how they do or do not connect.

A

quantitative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

which method

focus on understanding the complexity of humans in the context of their lives. Attempts to build a complete picture of a phenomenon of interest. Involves the collection of info as its expressed by people within the normal context of their lives.

A

qualitative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

which method

Collecting info thats specific and limited to the particular parts of vents or phenomena being studied.

A

quantitave

25
Q

does qual or quant break things down?
which of these assembles info into a whole picture?
what does mixed methods do?

A

quant studies things by isolating them and looking at the small details

qual assembles info into a whole picture

mixed uses both so it is considered holistic

26
Q

regardless of wht kind of methods were used the methods section of a research report generally contains info about what 3 things

A

 The sample
 The data collection procedures
 The data analysis methods

27
Q

what method would be concerned with ensuring the subgroup or sample and what happens to them is similar is emphasized in quantitative research methods

A

quantitative

28
Q

what should the sampling subsection contain

A

 The sampling subsection describes how people were chosen, what was done to find them, and what if any limits or restrictions were placed on who or which research could be done in the dtudy.
 It gen describes how many people declined to be in the study, withdrew or were not included in it for specific reasons.

29
Q

what should the sampling subsection contain

A

 The sampling subsection describes how people were chosen, what was done to find them, and what if any limits or restrictions were placed on who or which research could be done in the dtudy.
 It gen describes how many people declined to be in the study, withdrew or were not included in it for specific reasons.

30
Q

if using multiple studies to nswer a research question what might you use (what kind of paper would you be writing? not sure)

what kind of sampling method would you use

A

metasynthesis

more complex sampling method involving the analysis of info about each indiv studys report in ordr to id the sample of reports that best met the criteria of the stdy. They would then describe how studies were chosen and why not

31
Q

what kind of procedures would they use for qualitative research

A

 Procedures for qualitative involves systematically planned activitie eg observations or open and unstructured interviews of people in their natural life situations. My be recorded to note each pause intonation etc. Detailed notes may be taken eg on participants expression. Naturally occurring conditions and subjectivity characterize qualitative methods

32
Q

what are measures (in relation to procedures of research methods)

A

 Measures are the specific meths used to assign number or numbers to an aspect or factr being studied

33
Q

t or f the terms used in research have a range of meanings rather than a single, discrete, locked in meaning

A

true

34
Q

the problem section of the report aka ____

what is described here

A

introduction

section of research report describes the gap in knowledge thats addressed b the research study. They explain why the research was needed, why it was carried out in that manner and oftn what the researcher is predicting or asking

35
Q

why does the problem or introduction section generally contain a background review subsection

A

• the inrto or problem section gen includes a background or literature review subsection thats focused summary of whats already been published. This shows where the gaps in knowledge are. The literature review isn’t limited to research studies

36
Q

t or f
all studies have a hypothesis

you can use a hypothesis when there are existing theories or you have ideas of what relationships are expected to be found

A

• hypothesis—a prediction regarding the relationships or effects of selected factors on other factors. Not every study has a hypothesis. To have hypothesis there must be existing knowledge

37
Q

what is logistical regression and why is it used

what section of the research report would this be in

A

 Logistic regression—is a statistical procedure that allows us to look at relationships between more than two factors and test whether those relationships are likely to occur by chance

found in the results

38
Q

what are the similarities between the nursing process and the research process

A

they are both

  • processes with steps
  • a form of problem solving
  • complex puzzle
39
Q

what are the differences between the nursing and research process
in relation to the purpose

A

purpose of research is to devlop knowledge

purpose of nursing process is to provide scientificlly? text stops but maybe to provide EBP?

40
Q

what are the differences between the nursing and research process
in terms of planning and implementing

A

research-plans and implements knowledge acquisition while nursing plans and implements delivery of care

41
Q

what are the differences between the nursing and research process
what is done with the data afterwards

A

nursing-evaluation concerned with outcomes

research-analysis and interpretation concerned with knowing

42
Q

what is meta synthesis

what is this a form of

A

• metasynthesis—a report of a study of a group of single research studies using qualitative methods

43
Q

what is meta-analysis

A

• meta-analysis—quantitative approach to knowledge dev that applies stats to numeric results from different studies that addressed the same research proble to look for combined results that wouldn’t happen by chance alone

44
Q

meta-analysis and meta-synthesis are both similar to

A

systematic review

45
Q

defn of systematic review and how is it different than metasynthesis or metaanalysis

A

addresses a specific clinical question by summarizing multiple research studies along with other evidence. Its different than metasynth or analysis as they addres clinical uetions and they don’t gen apply statistical procedures to the info ollected from indiv studies or develop systematic metasummary of the content of each study

46
Q

would systematic review or metasynthesis or analysis use a specific pt care or clinical practice questionand why

A

systematic review has speicific question because the intent of the review is to provide evidence for practice

47
Q

would metasynthesis and metaanalysis have more defined search methods than systematic review

A

usually yes, they have clearly identified methods with inclusion and exclusion criteria

48
Q

what is quality improvment and how does it relate to the research process

A

• Quality improvement—resembles but differs from research process. it is often based on research which informs the process
It is a process of eval of healthcare services to see if they meet specified standards or outcomes of care and to identify how they can be improved.

• Quality imp is all activities that contribute to defining, designing, assessing, monitoring, and improving the quality of healthcare. Focus on patient, systems and processes, measurement, teamwork

49
Q

what kind of questions does quality improvement ask
specific name for this

what kind of relationships do quality improvement studies look at

A
  • The questions in QI are whether a certain set of actions is occurring and how desirable outcomes can be facilitated (a type of descriptive research question
  • QI studies often examine relationships among factors that may affect the outcome or actions of interest.
50
Q

what is process improvement and how does it compare to metasynth and analysis, sytematic review

A

• Process improvement—is a mgmt system in which all participants involved strive to improve customer satisfaction. Meanwhile, meta analysis, meta synth, systematic reviews try to find the best practices to improve pt outcomes while process improvment tries to improve the process in which care delivery is carried out

51
Q

process improvement vs quality improvement

what principles do they share

how are they different

A
  • Process improvement is a mgmt system while quality improvement sees to find practice related answers. Despite these similarities they are often synonymous.
  • Process and quality imp use the same quality principles
  • Process imp based extensively in business industry to get to customer satisfaction, efficiency
52
Q

how is quality improvement different than the research process

A

• Quality improvement resembles traditional research but differences are: the problems address in QImp study usually concerns whether certain expected clinical care were completed. QI doesn’t so much try to understand phenomenon but rather studies what is being done or whats happened

53
Q

what is step 1 of the research process and what does this entail

A

define and describe a knowledge gap or problem

o Often look at previous research
o The researchers question often changes
o Culminates in statement of a problem

54
Q

what are the remaining steps in research process after

define and describe a knowledge gap or problem

A

• Step 2 develop a detailed plan to gather info to address the problem or gap in knowledge

• Step 3 implement the study
o May involve gathering questionnaires, organizing, analyzing info
o The outcomes are recorded in the results section

  • Step 4 analyse and interpret the results of the study
  • Step 5 disseminate the findings from the research study
55
Q

if you have to make a change to your study’s plan do you need to record this

A

yes, in the methods section

56
Q

in qualitative research does all interpretation of data take place in the “analysis and interpretation of results” step of the research process

A

o In qualitative research this is often woven closely into third step as the analysis often guide further data collection

57
Q

where would you find the meaning of findings vs the findings themselves

A

the findings would be in results and the interpretation of meaning would likely be in conclusions section

58
Q

Grounded theory

Quant or qual

A

Qualitative