Chapter 2 Flashcards
Explain why all scientists value research-based conclusions over beliefs based on experience
Experience may not be accurate as:
1. it does not involve a comparison group
2. is confounded (daily life has many factors)
3. is not generalisable (unlike research, which is probabilistic - trying to predict/explain a high proportion of cases)
How does one locate legitimate research-based information and read it with purpose?
Reliable databases for research can be found in PsychINFO, Google Scholar, websites of researchers and available in academic libraries.
Explain why all scientists value research-based conclusions over beliefs based on intuition
Intuition is flawed as
1. it is affected by biases in thinking - availability heuristic, present/present bias, confirmation bias, bias blind spot
2. it can be swayed by a good story
Explain why all scientists value research-based conclusions over beliefs based on authority
If an authority’s findings are based on their own experience or intuition, they are unreliable. However, if they use well-conducted studies to support their claims, it is possible to trust their advice.
How should you approach journal articles, chapters in edited books and full-length books?
they should be read with purpose, asking what is the theoretical argument, what is the evidence and what does the data say?
Can popular media articles and books be good sources of information?
Yes, as long as you think critically. Journalists might not cover the information accurately and you should always compare the article with its original scientific source
What is disinformation?
It is news that is deliberately created to mislead or provoke.
What are all the biases in intuition?
- Availability heuristic - the things that easily come to mind guide our thinking
- Bias blind spot - the belief that we are unlikely to fall prey to other biases
- Present/present bias - failing to look for absences and easily notice the present
- Confirmation bias - the tendency to only look at information that agrees with what we want
What is the difference between empirical and review journal articles?
Empirical ones conduct the direct investigation, obtaining the data. In contrast, review journal articles are like meta analyses where they combine and review a bunch of empirical articles