Chapter 2 Flashcards
Mental representations:
-Things in the mind that stand for things in the world
Mental Processes:
-Operations over representations
-“computations” ( or “activations” ) of representations
What is an example of a representation
cinq = 5
V = 5
five = 5
They all “represent” the same content
Representations as images:
They resemble what they are about (except for abstract ideas)
To know something is to have it: you represent “red ball” because you have red and ball as the visual properties
Descartes, Hobbers, Hume:
- Mental representations are ideas
- these ideas take different forms (codes, images)
-These ideas enter into cognitive processes
Mental processes are __ ( ___)
Mental processes are “calculations” (computations)
Mental processes are “calculations” (computations) that are:
-Language-like
-Abstract
-Symbolic
Mental processes are the very elements of ___
Thoughts / cognitive processes
Mental images have been used as explanation for ___
Mental images have been used as explanation for mental processes for centuries
(in regards to mental images), with our “minds eye” we are:
imagining - not seeing
Imagination/thinking does not rely on the :
same principles as
perception
Imagination/thinking does not rely on the same principles of perception, responses are based on:
KNOWLEDGE of what the resulting colours might be, not some form of reactivation of perceptual content
Images ___ when perceived
Images NEED TO BE INTERPRETED when perceived
If we were to store “raw” images, we would need to ___
REINTERPRET THEM IN RECALL
If we were to store “raw” images, we would need to reinterpret them in recall, we would also need to rely on
____
If we were to store “raw” images, we would need to reinterpret them in recall. We would also need to rely on some CODE TO CALL THEM UP - which would have to be some form of TAG, METADATA, or DESCRIPTIONS
mental processes can be thought as : ___
mental processes can be thought of as computation over representations
Computations over symbolic representations are :
Operations driven by rules (syntax) –> reasoning
We can think about computations within ___
we can think about computations within specialized cognitive systems such as language, vision, etc
In regards to mental processes as computation over representations, the idea is that behind most perceptual or cognitive processes there are:
sets of rules governing the processes
cognition = neurophysiology?
NO!
Are our explanations INTRINSICALLY DEPENDENT on the nature of this physical device?
NO
Should we reduce the cognitive explanation to a neurophysiological account of brain states?
NO