Chapter 17: Promoting Clean Technology: Theory Flashcards

1
Q

What generic problems do regulations face?

What conculusion about environmental policy drawn?

A

Regulations Face generic problems:

  1. Rapid economic growth
  2. Rising marginal costs of control
  3. Leakage problem

Also weakened over time through political influence

Hence: regulation alone might not be sufficient achieve environmental goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does CTs have in common?

A
  • Waste reduction in manufacturing
  • Biomimicry
  • Recycling of wastes
  • Low input agriculture
  • Closed loop production
  • Water efficiency
  • Renewable energy production
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Three parts of the definition for Clean Technology:

A
  1. Services of similar quality to existing technology
  2. Cost-competitive with existing technologies (in the long run)
  3. Environmentally Superior to existing technologies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Definition of CT:

Services of similar quality to existing technology: (1)

A
  • Similar or better quality

Bad choices rejected by consumers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Definition of CT:

(2) Cost-competitive with existing technologies (in long run):

A
  • Cost comparison: long-run private marginal costs (cost producing additional unit once tech is mature - including all taxes and regulatory costs)
  • Biggest problem (solar, nuclear = satisfy other two → hard satisfy this one)

Cost competitive without subsidies
- When addicted to government support - hard wean off
- Maybe sub in the beginning = must be able to take away
- If CTs cannot compete on basis private costs, then consumers will not adopt widely

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the types of clean technologies?

#2 Cost-competitive with existing technologies (in long run)

A
  1. Late-stage CTsCost competitive with existing techs at current volume production
  2. Early-State CTsNot yet nigh-pruduction volumes to achieve minimum lr costs
    • Still doing research and progress (lab level and test market)
    • Not expected to be CC
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

#2 Cost-competitive with existing technologies (in long run)

Falling average costs?

A

What is the solar market going to look like? → Already know what other markets look like

  • Hence, financing project hard
  • Therefore, hard to get large upfront costs

Falling Average Costs:

  • Economies of scale
  • Learning by doing: as production ramps up, discover lower-cost methods
  • External economies: As complementary industries and markets develop, input costs fall
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Definition of CTs

Environmentally superior to existing technologies

A

Smaller carbon footprint, less damage wildlife

  • Problem #1: Need to track impacts “cradle to grave”
    Solution?
    Life-cycle analysis used to determine environmental impact of tech
  • Problem #2 Different techs have non-comparable impacts
    Solution?
    Monetize and total expected life-cycle environmental damage for each source
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the Path Dependency Theory?

A

Ex: choosing a major, longterm relationship

  • Current tech represent only one possible path development
  • Path society chooses depends variety factors

Once path chosen, other paths closed off:

  • Infrustructure and R&D investment supposed chosen tech
  • Economies of scale helps consolidate cost advantage
  • Complementary tech develop that are tailored to chosen path
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Path Dependency Theory

How to determine a path:

A
  1. Relative production costs
  2. Consumer preferences
  3. Relative political strenght of conflicting interests
  4. Chance historical circumstance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Path Dependency Theory

Role of the Government:

A

Influence market-driven process of tech development towards path consistent with sustainable future

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are obstacles facing CTs?

If CTs are superior, why not being developed by private entrepreneurs?

A

CTs are cost competitive, but because they compete in mature markets with low profit margins, they are NOT likely to be highly profitable

lack subtantial profit advantange …

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What makes it difficult to overcome the obstacles facing CTs?

A
  1. High sunk costs in marketing
    - Changes to success is very small → might not want to take up costs due to uncertainty
  2. Thin supplier markets
  3. Poor access capital
    • require large start startup costs → hard gague certain/new markets
  4. Consumers requirements for high rates of return for investment in efficient, durable CTs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the government obstacles to CTs?

A
  • Direct or indirect substidies to highly polluting competitors

Why?
Substize because large companies are huge empoyers (not because they are favored in the present)

- Get addicated subsidies & political incentives
- Externalities

Direct Subsidies:

  • Tied production level

Indirect Subsidies:

  • More and more common (harder to see)
  • Not give money but not make you give me moneyEx: not give subsidies for coal production but give land for free
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are direct and indirect subsidies?

A

Direct Subsidies:

  • Tied production level

Indirect Subsidies:

  • More and more common (harder to see)
  • Not give money but not make you give me moneyEx: not give subsidies for coal production but give land for free
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How can government mistakes make bad subsidies get “locked in?”

A

Governments makes mistakes: bad subsidies can get “locked in”

  1. Nuclean fusion
  2. Corn-based ethanol

Inefficient tech survive due to subsidies:

Nuclear fission

Should we adopt tech x?

Not equipt make decision: best and brightest work in the industry

  • Not powerless:
    1. Level the playingfield
    2. Cant pick the winner but can pick a looser
  • Want to subsidize: based low-cost preformance
    • If you can come in below current technology → then give more funding to help push along
    • Show that you will be cost-effective (rather than speculation)
17
Q

What two methods can be used to minizine government obstacles?

A

(1) Minimizing Errors and Political Influence:

  1. Level playing field: eliminate subsidies for dirty tech and internalize external costs
  2. Promote only clear environmental winners
  3. Tie subsidies to reduction in cost and improvements in quality

(2) Least-Cost Planning:

  • Gov’s objective is to speed up, not replace, market process of adoption of CTsMarket forces utimately only spread profitable techs
  • Bureaucrats avoid making expensive commtments to technological white elephants
18
Q

How to promote early state CTs?

A

Relatively low profit advantage of CTs discourages private-sector initiatives to overcome natural inclination to stick with “what works”
Policies:

  1. Provide info to consumers and reduce preceived risk of adoption
    1. If in late-stage development: product labelingChange way people behave
    2. “Environmental packaging:” carbon emitted, trees cut down, animals killed ….
      How much damage is being done? → change consumer behavior
    3. Minimim design/safety standards:
      • Building design, certain products must meet certain level energy efficiency
  2. R&D funding (research)
  3. Tech-forcing standards
  4. Infrustructure investment
    1. Ex: biggest impediment for electric cars are that there is not infrustructure around it → help (not subsidize unit costs) but building
  5. Help private firms get loans (indirect subsidies)
    1. Why: government cant go bankrupt like private companies ⇒ less riskTherefore, borrow at lower interest rates and then borrow to private c
    2. Co-sign on the loan (if company goes bankrupt then the government pays it back = lower interest rate)
19
Q

How to overcome information barriers:

A
  1. Product labeling requirements
  2. Flexible design standards
  3. Tech assistance programs
  4. Subsidies for consumers

Forms:

1. Tax credit
2. Low-interest loans 
3. Grants 

Loans and grants preferable to encourage small scale CTs 

- requires group to justify investment
- Discourage non-serious applicants
- Provide means to allocate funds on least-cost basis
20
Q

How to promote late-stage CTs:

A
  1. Product labeling and certification
  2. Minimum design standards
  3. Utility marketing
  4. Technical assistance programs
  5. Consumer subsidies
21
Q

What are technology-forcing regulations?

A

Set deadline firms deliver tech that is not yet marketed

  • (CAFE) Corporate Average Fuel Economy - require firms meet increased average vehicle mileage in future years
  • (RPS) Renewable Portfolio Standard - requires utility to incresae certain percentage of renewable energy generation in mix
22
Q

Is alternative agriclture a clean tech?

A

Organic more ineffient than other mass-produced agriculture

  • Cost competitive? Often: reduced yields (maybe) but reduce costs (definitely)
    Cost reduction often sufficient to offset any lost production
  • Environmentally superior conventional agriculture? yes
  • Comparable quality? Yes
23
Q

What are the barriers to adopting clean agriculture technology?

A

Low profit advantage to overcome substantial adjustement costs

  1. New managerial techniques
  2. Successful techniques highly region-specific
  3. Time to transition
24
Q

What are direct and indirect benefits?

A

Direct benefits:

Cleaner and lower volume waste disposal

Indirect Benefits:

  • energy savings
  • Upstream pollution avoided

Due to uncertainty: might stick current technology because of uncertainty. If profit gains, but they are not garunteed (imperfect information: costs/benefits might be overstated or understated)
then it is not worthit = not adopted ⇒ lack clear profit advantange