Chapter 09: Measuring the Sustainability Standard Flashcards
What is the issue with sustainability and capital?
Interested amount of capital and sustainability - issue: measure sustainability and def.
Has human well-being improved?
Human well-being improved:
- Fewer famines, increased caloric intake, reduced child and infant mortality, increased life expectancy
Will this overall trend has cont. in recent decades, continue in the future?
What was Thomas Malthus’s An Essay on the Principle of Population about?
Thomas Malthus wrote book: An Essay on the Principle of Population
- Ecologicalist - fairly pessimistic
Assumed:
- Food supply grows arithmetically
- Healthy population grows geometrically
Population growth outstrip food supply, leading increased bad shit* (cyclical)
Population growth outstrip food supply, leading increased bad shit* (cyclical)
How has Malthus’s assumptions been challenged?
Challenging Assumptions:
If premises correct - numbers were way off (generous)
Somewhat right and wrong (missed out tech advances)
- Agricultural output has not grown arithmetically(1950-80s) Green Revolution resulted great increased yield
Today:
- Food production > caloric intake - Market distorted = not appropriate distribution
-
Population not always increase geometrically
Excluding immigration, developed countries have very low population growth rates - often below zero
(a) New family and birthcontrol
(b) Access to eduction for women = less children
(c) Increased affluence - smaller families
- correction birth rate and poverty
- Cost investing children increase - diminishing marginal returns
How have ecological economists replied to Malthus?
Ecological Economist’s Reply:
- Other resource contraints arable land
- Agriculture requires massive quantities of fresh water, energy …
Just because production increased faster than pop - no guarantee that it will cont. in the future
- Rising affluence resulted massive increase demand meat (resource intensive)
1972 Book: Limits to Growth and 2009 Study: Planetary Boundaries
♻️ Food production today > caloric intake
Why: Market distored = not appropriate distribution
Define Ecosystem Services:
Ecosystem Services:
Benefits people receive from nature (Chapter 10)
Factor into natural capital (clean air, bee population)
Ex: Clean air, bee population
- Hard to quantify
- Current measures: better than nothing
Majority ecosystems services be declining at the same time as there are big gains in human well-being?
- May be important services (ex: food production) increasing → makes up other decline
- Tech advances made well-being less dependent natural capital
- Time lags between declines natural capital and declines in standards of living
What are the four ways to measure sustainability?
I. IPAT Equation
II. Ecological Footprint
III. Net National Welfare (NNW)
IV. Inclusive Wealth
IPAT
What is the IPAT measurement?
IPAT equation → Environmental Impact = Population X Affluence X Technology
Guidance to scale of substitution from manufactured capital that would be needed from degrading natural capital
- P = Population (Number of people in x)
- A = Affluence (Whatever trying to measure influence = hope to create amount of affluent)
- T = Technology (Hard to measure - effect output)
Smaller it gets → more tech is advancing
IPAT
What are the 3 challenges to reducing environmental impact
3 Challenges to Reducing Environmental Impact: (Direct Relationship)
- Reduce population
- Reduce Standard of living
- Reverse technnology (less = better) = improve tech
However, P and A increasing
Burden on T → must change a lot
IPAT
How does ecologists and neoclassicalists view IPAT?
- Ecologists: T not fast enough → must offset by something else
- Neoclassicalists: (Optimistic) Tech grow fast enough
3 Challenges to Reducing Environmental Impact: (Direct Relationship)
- Reduce population
- Reduce Standard of living
- Reverse technnology (less = better) = improve tech
However, P and A increasing
Ecological Footprint
Define ecological footprint:
Calculate how much land and water area needed provide resources for production and for assimilation of wastes for community (waste always sideeffect)
- All activities use land+water = footprint
- Currently: need about 1.5 earths to accommodate all demands over time
Ecological Footprint
What is “zero footprint?”
Zero Footprint: Replace land and water used → Net effect = zero (not emit nothing)
- Ex: Airlines add pay extra to offset carbon footprint
Ecological Footprint
What is the correlation between wealth and ecological footprint?
How does that relate to offsetting wealth?
Strong correlation between footprint and wealth
Makes sense ask poor countries offset wealth FP
If offset:
(2) Wealthest must reduce more
(1) Rather: ask offset same amount
Only perfect agreement: Num changes insignificant = accomplish nothing
Ecological Footprint
What is the human development index? (HDI)
Human Development Index (HDI):
Includes measures of per capita income, education levels, and life expectancy (varies between 0 and 1)
- Norway highest: 0.94
- DRC lowest: 0.29