Chapter 15 (Estimating Real Property Value) Flashcards
Federally related transaction
Any real estate–related financial transaction that a federal financial institution’s regulatory agency (FFIRA) has either contracted for, or regulates, and requires the services of an appraiser.
Transaction value
The loan amount in most appraisal assignments.
The specified value threshold of $250,000 is called the de minimis requirement.
Types of Value
- Assessed value is the value used as a basis for property taxation.
- Insurance value is an estimate of the amount of money required to replace a structure in the event of some catastrophic event such as fire.
- Investment value is the price an investor would pay, given the investor’s own financing requirements and income tax situation. This type of value is personal to a particular investor.
- Liquidation value is the value associated with a rapid sale. The amount of dollars a property should bring in a foreclosure sale is an example of liquidation value.
- Going-concern value is the value of an income-producing property or business characterized by a significant operating history.
- Salvage value is the estimated amount for which improvements can be sold at the end of a structure’s useful life.
Market Value
While the word value has many different meanings, market value is of special interest to the field of real estate.
The concept of market value is based on a theory that in any open market there will be a number of buyers and sellers. If hundreds of transactions are concluded over time, some parties will pay too much and some will pay too little. But the vast majority of value decisions by both buyers and sellers will tend to converge in a fairly small range.
That range represents a range of market value, whether the market is dealing in houses, oranges, cattle, or something else.
Many definitions of market value, or fair market value as it is sometimes called, can be found.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac require the following definition of market value for the appraisal of all real property securing a mortgage intended for sale to either of those major secondary market agencies:
The most probable price that a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus.
Inherent in this definition are the assumptions that:
market value applies to a specified date and may change with the passage of time;
the seller is able to convey a marketable title;
buyer and seller are typically motivated, and neither buyer nor seller is under any compulsion or pressure to conclude a sale;
both buyer and seller are well informed and acting in their individual best interests;
the property is exposed for sale on the open market for a reasonable time;
the terms of sale are in cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and
the price represents a normal consideration for the property, unaffected by creative financing or sales concessions such as seller contributions or buydowns.
Cost, Price, and Value
- Cost is the total expenditure required to bring a new improvement into existence plus the cost of the land. A contractor will install site improvements (water, sewer, and so forth); acquire the necessary permits; secure the services of architects, engineers, surveyors, and other professionals; construct the building; landscape the site; market the property; and so forth. The total of these expenditures is called cost. A contractor wants the cost to be less than the price a consumer will pay—and the consumer will pay more than the cost only if the consumer perceives the property’s value to exceed its cost.
- Price refers to the amount of money actually paid in a transaction. Price and value are not necessarily equal. For example, you might purchase a computer for $2,000. Its price was $2,000. However, it may actually command less (or more) than $2,000 in exchange if you were to attempt to sell the computer. In real estate, price is synonymous with contract price.
- The value of a good or service is determined by its ability to command other goods or services in exchange. Exchange value is the monetary value of a good or service to many buyers and sellers at a particular time. Today, we regard exchange value as market value, which is the consensus of the interactions of many buyers and sellers in the marketplace.
Overimprovement
An owner invests more money in a structure than the owner may reasonably expect to recapture.
Characteristics of Value
To have value, goods or services must possess the following four traits:
- To remember the characteristics of value, remember DUST:
1. Demand
2. Utility - In real estate, utility means the ability to provide useful services and benefits to an owner or tenant. (To fill a need)
3. Scarcity - When apartments are scarce, landlords can increase rents, and the excess demand will fill any resulting vacancies.
4. Transferability - The legal ability to convey title and possession of goods creates transferability. This is an unusually important factor in real estate.
Value cannot exist in cases where rights in land and the use of property cannot be transferred.
Highest and Best Use
The most profitable legal way that a property can be used.
The use must be:
legally permissible (zoning); physically possible (soil type, the site's shape, size, and slope); and financially feasible (income generated considering cost of improvements).
2 Types: Use of Vacant Land and Use of Improved Property
There are three approaches to estimating real property value:
Sales comparison approach (comparable sales method)
Cost-depreciation approach (cost method)
Income approach (income method)
Reconciliation
A process of weighted averaging used in the sales comparison approach to bring the adjusted values of several comparable properties into a single estimate of value.
In a reconciliation, any detected errors are corrected and, based on the type of property, a degree of priority (importance) is assigned to each approach used.
For example:
If the property being appraised is a vacant lot in an established neighborhood, the sales comparison approach is considered the most relevant approach to value.
If the property is an income-producing property, the income capitalization approach usually is given the most importance.
The cost-depreciation approach usually is most significant for newly constructed homes and for cross-checking the other two approaches.
It is also considered the most relevant approach when appraising special-purpose properties such as hospitals, schools, or government buildings.
Principle of Substitution
A prudent buyer or investor will pay no more for a property than the cost of acquiring an equally desirable substitute property.
The principle of substitution is the basis for all three approaches to market value.
Sales Comparison Approach
A method for estimating value by comparing similar properties with the subject property based on the theory that a knowledgeable purchaser will pay no more for a property than the cost of acquiring an equally acceptable substitute property.
The sales comparison approach (also called the comparable sales approach or market approach) is based on the premise that the value of a property can be estimated accurately by reviewing recent sales of properties (comparables or comps) similar to the property being appraised (subject property) and comparing those properties with the subject property.
Because time can affect property values, the sales used for comparison purposes must meet two qualifications:
- They must have occurred recently in the same market area where the subject property is located.
- The comparable properties selected must be similar to the subject property.
To remember how adjustments are made, remember CBS versus CIA:
*Comp
Better
Subtract
vs.
*Comp
Inferior
Add
Adjustment Grid
The process of comparison in the sales comparison approach is organized into an adjustment grid.
The adjustment grid is used to ensure that no adjustment factor important to a value conclusion is overlooked.
Adjustment Process
The appraiser prepares the adjustment grid by first entering the street address and sale price for each selected comparable.
Adjustments for transactional differences such as conditions of sale, financing terms, and changes in market conditions since the date of sale are made first, followed by adjustments for property characteristics. Those adjustments include the following:
- Financing terms.
Appraisers must confirm the financing associated with each sale because the sale price could reflect special financing terms, such as seller financing or seller-paid points.
Assume the financing associated with each of the sales was conventional financing and that it was typical financing for the market area.
- Conditions of sale.
Appraisers must research the conditions of sale to determine if the buyer or seller was under abnormal pressure to buy or sell or if there was a special relationship between the parties to the transaction, such as between family members or business associates. In the example below, the appraiser verified the conditions of sale for each of the sales and found them to be normal.
- Market conditions.
A property that sold last month or last year may sell for more, or for less, today, even though the property itself has not physically changed.
The criterion for making an adjustment for market conditions is whether the price paid for a comparable property, if that property were sold on today’s market, would differ from the price paid during some other period of time. Referring to the chart below, we see that the appraiser adjusted Comparable (Comp) 1 plus $2,830. Assume that Comp 1 sold six months ago and the appraiser has estimated a market conditions adjustment of 4% annually (or 2% for six months). The appraiser is adjusting the sale price of the comparable to estimate what the comp would have sold for under today’s market conditions. Similarly, Comp 2 sold three months ago so the appraiser has entered a plus $1,360 adjustment (or 1%). Comp 3 sold very recently, so a market conditions adjustment was not needed.
- Square footage.
Assume Comp 1 is 160 square feet larger than the subject property.
Because Comp 1 is superior to the subject property with respect to square footage, a downward adjustment is needed. The appraiser has estimated $60 per square foot as an appropriate unit of comparison and has entered an adjustment of minus $9,600 (or 160 square feet × $60). Because Comp 2 is 20 square feet smaller than the subject, the appropriate upward adjustment is needed.
- Landscaping.
Because Comp 3 has nicer landscaping, compared with the subject property, a downward adjustment is made to Comp 3.
Example
What is the estimated market value of a subject lot that is 110’ × 120’ (13,200 sq. ft.)?
Adjustment Analysis
Comparable Sales:
Sale 1: A lot 100’ × 120’ located across the street from the subject lot sold recently for $36,800.
Sale 2: A lot 110’ × 120’ in the same neighborhood as the subject lot sold recently for $37,000.
Sale 3: A lot 100’ × 100’ in a different but similar-quality neighborhood sold recently for $36,000.
Sale 4: A lot 130’ × 150’ located in a different but similar neighborhood but near a railroad sold recently for $39,800.
Solution:
Sale 1: $36,800 ÷ 12,000 sq. ft. = $3.067 per sq. ft.
Sale 2: $37,000 ÷ 13,200 sq. ft. = $2.803 per sq. ft.
Sale 3: $36,000 ÷ 10,000 sq. ft. = $3.600 per sq. ft.
Sale 4: $39,800 ÷ 19,500 sq. ft. = $2.041 per sq. ft.
Reconciliation:
Sale 1: $3.067 × .35 = $1.073 Sale 2: $2.803 × .30 = $.841 Sale 3: $3.600 × .20 = $.720 Sale 4: $2.041 × .15 = $.306 100% = $2.940 = $2.94 per sq. ft.
Total square footage of subject lot: 13,200
Reconciled value per sq. ft.: × $2.94
Estimated market value of subject lot = $38,808 (round to $38,800)
Note that in the reconciliation process, sale 3 was given less weight in the final analysis because it was in a different neighborhood, and sale 4 was given the least weight because of its proximity to a railroad track and its location in a different neighborhood. If all the comparables had been considered good representations of the subject property, the appraiser would have given all four comparables equal weight and simply averaged them to arrive at a value per square foot.
Cost-Depreciation Approach
Estimate value by taking cost minus depreciation plus site value, based on the theory that a knowledgeable purchaser will pay no more for a property than the cost of acquiring a similar site and constructing an acceptable substitute structure.
The maximum value of a property can be measured by determining the cost to acquire an equivalent site and to reproduce a structure as though new, and then subtracting accrued depreciation.
The cost-depreciation approach formula is: reproduction cost of the building – accrued depreciation = indicated value of the building \+ estimated value of the site = indicated value of the property
There are four steps in the cost-depreciation approach.
Step 1
Estimate the current reproduction (or replacement) cost of the improvements as of the appraisal date.
Reproduction cost is the amount of money required to build an exact duplicate of the structure.
Replacement cost is the amount of money required to replace a structure having the same use and functional utility as the subject property but using modern, available, or updated materials. Consider a historic bungalow home.
The cost to duplicate the home in exact detail, including the hand carved trim on the porch, is reproduction cost. However, if the home were to be reconstructed in the same bungalow style but with modern materials and techniques, this cost is replacement cost.
- Three cost estimating methods are described here, with the most technical and precise method first:
1. Quantity survey method.
This method involves a detailed inventory of all labor, materials, products, and indirect costs, plus the builder’s profit, required to reproduce a building. The number of items is then multiplied by the cost per item. For example, in a single-family dwelling with three baths, multiply the cost of one commode by 3, the cost of one bathtub by 3, etc. If 1,000 linear feet of 2-by-6s are required at a cost of $.50 per foot, the cost would be $500.
The man-hours for each type of labor involved are estimated and multiplied by the cost per hour. All costs are totaled and then added to overhead and indirect costs. The builder’s profit then is added. The aggregate of all costs is the reproduction cost of a new building.
- Unit-in-place method.
This method is more practical for appraisers and requires less technical ability. The cost of materials plus the cost of labor to install them is calculated for each component of a structure, such as the driveway, parking area, roof, foundation, walls, and floors. For example, the unit-in-place cost for a square of roofing (100 square feet) can be obtained. The unit cost is then multiplied by the number of units in the entire roof. Each separate component is treated in the same manner. Adding the costs of installed equipment and fixtures and builder’s profit results in the total reproduction cost of the structure.
- Comparative square-foot or cubic-foot method.
This method is sometimes called the comparative unit method or the unit comparison method. The cost of reproducing a recently built property similar in size and function to the subject property is often used as a basis for estimating the reproduction cost. To reduce errors in this method, square-foot or cubic-foot costs are obtained for a standard (or benchmark) house of average size for the locality. Exterior walls are used for measurements. Adjustments are then made for quality, shape, and extra features.
Step 2
Estimate the amount of depreciation from all causes (physical deterioration, functional obsolescence, and external obsolescence) and deduct it from the reproduction (or replacement) cost.
The appraiser begins with an estimate of what it would cost to reproduce the structure as though new today. But the subject property is usually not a brand new structure. The difference between the structure’s reproduction (or replacement, if applicable) cost new and the perceived market value of the structure today in its actual condition is called accrued depreciation. Depreciation is the loss in value caused by things such as wear and tear, poor design, or the structure’s surroundings (proximity). Accrued depreciation is the total depreciation that has accumulated over the years.
Depreciation can be curable or incurable. Curable depreciation occurs when a building component has been added or repaired and the owners are able to get their money back in added value. For example, assume it costs $1,500 to repair and clean the screens in a screened-in porch. If potential buyers would pay at least $1,500 more for the home because of the condition of the porch, the depreciation is curable. Incurable depreciation occurs when a building component has been added or repaired but the owners are unable to get their money back in added value. For example, assume a home has five-year-old kitchen appliances in excellent working order. The owners purchase all new kitchen appliances for $20,000. If potential buyers are unwilling to pay an extra $20,000 for the home with new appliances, the depreciation is incurable.
Generally, accrued depreciation is associated with a structure’s age. As a building grows older, it loses value because of exposure to the sun and rain, as well as general usage. However, not all depreciation is associated with age. Depreciation in a structure can be attributed to three major causes:
- Physical deterioration.
Physical deterioration includes ordinary wear and tear caused by use, lack of maintenance, exposure to the elements, and physical damage. Brittle roof shingles or a worn out central air-conditioning compressor are examples of physical deterioration.
- Functional obsolescence.
Anything that is inferior due to operational inadequacies, poor design, or changing tastes and preferences is functional obsolescence. Examples include a poor traffic pattern, too few bathrooms, or an inadequate amount of insulation. An overimprovement is also considered functional obsolescence.
- External obsolescence.
Any loss in value due to influences originating outside the boundaries of the property, such as an expressway adjacent to a residential subdivision or deterioration of the neighborhood, is external obsolescence. Because external obsolescence is normally beyond the control of the property owner, it is considered incurable.
Land is not depreciated in the cost-depreciation approach. Only the buildings or other improvements to land are subject to these three types of depreciation because the site value is estimated separately, typically using the sales comparison approach. Any adjustments to the site for size, location, and nonstructural improvements were already made when the appraiser applied the sales comparison approach to estimate the site value. When the cost to reproduce the improvements is determined, depreciation is applied only to that portion of the property.
Step 3
Estimate the value of the site and nonstructural site improvements, assuming the site is vacant and will be put to its highest and best use. The value of land is normally determined by the sales comparison approach, explained earlier.
Step 4
To derive the property’s estimated value, add the estimated value of the site, including site improvements, to the depreciated structure value.
For example, if neighboring comparable properties are selling for $5 per square foot and the lot on which the subject structure stands has an area of 11,000 square feet, the land value is estimated to be $55,000.
The estimated property value of the subject property is as follows:
$210,000 depreciated structure + $55,000 site value = $265,000 estimated value of subject property
Lump-Sum Age-Life Method
Sometimes, appraisers estimate each category of depreciation separately. However, the vast majority of residential appraisals that employ the cost-depreciation approach use the lump-sum age-life method to estimate accrued depreciation. The method is so named because it estimates a single value for accrued depreciation.
The lump-sum method is based on a ratio of a property’s effective age to its economic life. Effective age is the age indicated by a structure’s condition and utility.
Chronologically, a home may be five years old. However, if the structure has been well maintained, its effective age may be only two years. There is no precise method for estimating effective age. The appraiser estimates a structure’s effective age by observing the structure’s current condition. A structure’s total economic life (or useful life) is the total estimated number of years that the structure is expected to contribute to the property’s value.
The appraiser divides the effective age of the structure by the total economic life of the structure.
Refer to the accrued depreciation formula below:
effective age ÷ total economic life × reproduction cost new = estimated total accrued depreciation
For example, suppose an appraiser estimates that the effective age of a 10-year-old building is four years. The appraiser estimates the cost to reproduce the structure as though new today is $225,000. If the total economic life is 60 years, what is the amount of accrued depreciation?
(4 years effective age ÷ 60 years economic life) × $225,000 reproduction cost new = $15,000 accrued deprecation
The lump-sum age-life method of calculating depreciation assumes that a structure depreciates at a constant rate. For this reason, it is sometimes called straight-line depreciation (the same amount of depreciation each and every year).
To demonstrate this point, let’s calculate the accrued depreciation in the previous example by first determining the amount of annual depreciation. Divide the reproduction cost by the economic life. The result is the annual depreciation. Multiply the annual depreciation by the effective age to derive the total accrued depreciation:
$225,000 reproduction cost new ÷ 60 years economic life = $3,750 annual depreciation × 4 years effective age = $15,000 accrued depreciation
An alternate accrued depreciation formula is: reproduction cost new ÷ total economic life = annual depreciation × effective age = accrued depreciation
The value of the structure today, in its current condition, is estimated by subtracting the accrued depreciation from the reproduction cost new:
$225,000 reproduction cost new - $15,000 accrued depreciation = $210,000 depreciated structure
Effective age
The age indicated by a structure’s condition and utility.
Economic Life
The total estimated time in years that an improvement will add value.
Income Approach
An estimated market value based on the present worth of future income from the subject property.
The object of the income approach (also called the income capitalization approach) is to measure a flow of income projected into the future.
This method is a complete departure from the sales comparison and cost-depreciation approaches.
The income approach develops an estimated market value based on the present worth of future income from the subject property.
It is the primary approach for appraising income-producing property and for comparing possible investments.
Potential Gross Income (PGI)
The total annual income a property would produce if it were fully rented and no collections losses were incurred.
Effective Gross Income (EGI)
The result of deducting vacancy and collection losses from annual potential gross income plus adding any income from miscellaneous sources.
Vacancy and collection losses
The expected income loss that will result from occasional turnover of tenants and periodic vacancies, as well as the likelihood that not all of the rental income will be collected.
Even when a property is 100% occupied, the probability of continuous total occupancy is unlikely. Therefore, some vacancy and collection losses should always be deducted from PGI.
The formula to calculate effective gross income is: potential gross income (PGI) – vacancy and collection losses \+ other income = effective gross income (EGI)