Chapter 15 Flashcards
What is the age and basics of the formal operational stage?
Piaget’s Fourth Stage – Formal Operation
• 11 to adulthood
• Can apply mental operations to abstract problems
• Can envision alternative or abstract realities
• Formal operational thinkers can solve problems by creating hypotheses and testing them
• Can use inferential thinking – the ability to think about things which the child has never seen before and draw conclusions from their thinking
What are the three aspects of the formal operational phase and what are the three experiments that show this?
- The can do abstract thinking and the proof for this is the third eye problem
- They cab do hypothetical thinking – solving problems by making and testing hypotheses and the proof of this is the pendulum problem
- They can do deductive reasoning and reason from logical premises even when those premises contradict everyday life and the proof for this is the glass and feather problem
What is the third eye problem?
If you had a third eye, where would you put it
Concrete operational says forehead cos that’s conventional
Formal says creative things like hand etc
Shows abstract thinking
What is the flask experiment?
Flask Experiment
• Give kids and adolescents flaks each containing what looks like the same clear liquid
• Tell them one combo of the liquids produces a blue liquid
• Ask them to determine the necessary combination
• Concrete operational ppl – start mixing liquids in a haphazard way
• Teens mix one liquid from a flask with all others, if this doesn’t work, they try it with the second flask etc
• They form hypotheses and they have to test them, and this is how they solve the problem
What is the pendulum problem?
Given several lengths of rope and weights and told to work out what influences the time it takes for one swing
- Can vary length of sting, weight, how far object Is raised before being released and how hard object is pushed
- Formal operative kids control for 3 and vary one eventually realising the length is all that matters
- Concrete kids vary things but not control for others
What is the glass and feather problem and what does it show?
- Adolescents can use deductive reasoning
- If you say (1) if you hit a glass with a feather, it will break and (2) Bernie hit a glass with a feather – concrete operational kids will use their experience to say that the glass doesn’t break, formal operational thinkers will say it boke because of their deductive reasoning
What is counterfactual thinking?
• This ability to work with counterfactual information – stuff not related to reality – improves with development
E.g. feather can break glass
What are the three characteristics of formal operational reasoning?
• The characteristics of formal operational reasoning are:
- Abstract – can reason with things not connected immediately to reality
- Hypothetical – can solve problems by forming hypotheses and testing them
- Deductive – Can better reason logically from premises, even when those premises contradict everyday experience
Do adolescents always use formal operational reasoning?
When do they do it?
When do adolescents use formal thinking?
• Kids who can formally operate don’t always
• They often revert to They are more likely to use sophisticated reasoning when the thing directly affects them
• When the product of reasoning is consistent with adolescents’ beliefs, they are less likely to find a flaw with the reasoning
• However, if they are told about the possible negative outcomes of their choices, this can weaken their experience of feeling regret once a risky decision is chosen – a weird finding
• So formal operation is more what people are capable of, not what they always do
What are the basics of information processing in adolescence?
Information Processing during Adolescence
• As usual, do not think this is a qualitatively different stage of cognitive development
• Considered to be a transitional period between the rapidly changing processes of childhood and mature cognitive processes of young adulthood
• Cognitive processes changes are different but less so than as seen in childhood
What happens to working memory and processing speed in adolescence?
- Adolescents working memory has the same speed as adults, so teenagers are better able to store information needed for ongoing processes
- This is shown experimental by response to a task in which you press a button when you see a stimulus: this time decreases with age, quickly up to 12 years old and relatively little after that
- This goes for several cognitive processes
What is working memory?
Working memory is the site of ongoing cognitive processing
What is processing speed?
• Processing speed is the speed with which individuals complete basic processes
How can we show that teenage and adult processing speeds are roughly equal?
- This is shown experimental by response to a task in which you press a button when you see a stimulus: this time decreases with age, quickly up to 12 years old and relatively little after that
- This goes for several cognitive processes
• Compared to kids, adolescents process information very efficiently
How does emotion affect processing times for adults and teenagers?
- Processing time for complex, emotional decision making becomes faster with age and experience
- When emotional factors are minimised and controlled, adolescents can be as capable of reasoning as adults
How does knowledge change in teenage years relative to childhood and adults?
Context Knowledge
• As kids move into adolescence, they get adult-levels of knowledge and understanding in many domains
• For example, parents ask teens to help them navigate the internet
• The increases knowledge allows adolescents to learn, understand and remember more of their new experiences
What is an overview of metacognition in teenage years?
Strategies and Metacognitive Skill
• Not fully developed but metacognitive skill allows adolescents to monitor their chosen strategy and verify that it is working
• They can also recognize that their thinking about a topic is ineffective
Do any adolescents use metacognitve processes better than others?
Adolescents who are gifted use metacognitive strategies differently and more flexibly
How does metacognition vary across adolescence?
Early adolescents have difficulty considering a broad range of outcomes when making choices
• In late adolescence, metacognitive skills are used to make reflective judgements – the ability to consider a broad range of information and outcomes in making a decision
What is Kholberg’s theory of moral reasoning?
Kohlberg’s Theory
• Kohlberg created a load of moral dilemmas which had no outcomes without undesirable parts
• There was no right answer
• Used them to explore how people made moral decisions
• He found people of different ages go through 6 stages across 3 levels:
Preconventional level - kohlberg
• Preconventional Level: For most kids, many adolescents and some adults, moral reasoning is controlled almost solely by obedience to authority, rewards and punishments
Stage 1 Kohlberg
• Stage 1 – Obedience orientation: People believe that adults know what is right and wrong. So a person should do what adult’s say is right to avoid punishment. Heinz should not steal the drug – cos adults made the law
Stage 2 Kohlberg
• Stage 2 – Instrumental orientation: People look out for their own needs. Are nice to others because they expect them to return the favour. Heinz should steal the drug because his wife will do something nice for him.
Preconventioanl level summary Kohlberg
- Preconventional Level: For most kids, many adolescents and some adults, moral reasoning is controlled almost solely by obedience to authority, rewards and punishments
- Stage 1 – Obedience orientation: People believe that adults know what is right and wrong. So a person should do what adult’s say is right to avoid punishment. Heinz should not steal the drug – cos adults made the law
- Stage 2 – Instrumental orientation: People look out for their own needs. Are nice to others because they expect them to return the favour. Heinz should steal the drug because his wife will do something nice for him.
Conventional level Kohlberg
• Conventional level: For most adolescents and most adults, moral decisions are based on social norms
Stage 3 Kohlberg
• Stage 3 – Interpersonal norms: Act according to other’s expectations. Aim is to win approval of others by being “good”. Heinz should not steal the drug because by doing so people will not think he is an honest person who obeys the law.
Stage 4 Kohlberg
• Stage 4 – Social system morality: Adolescents and adults believe that social roles, expectations and laws exist to maintain order within a society and promote the good of all people. Heinz should not steal because this is against the law and society must prohibit theft.
Conventional level kohlberg
- Conventional level: For most adolescents and most adults, moral decisions are based on social norms
- Stage 3 – Interpersonal norms: Act according to other’s expectations. Aim is to win approval of others by being “good”. Heinz should not steal the drug because by doing so people will not think he is an honest person who obeys the law.
- Stage 4 – Social system morality: Adolescents and adults believe that social roles, expectations and laws exist to maintain order within a society and promote the good of all people. Heinz should not steal because this is against the law and society must prohibit theft.
Postconventional level Kohlberg
• Postconventional level: For some adults, usually over 25, moral decisions are base on personal moral principles