Chapter 14 - Capital structure in perfect markets Flashcards

1
Q

What is capital structure and what is its meaning?

A

Capital structure refer to the issued equity, debt and other securities of a firm.

The meaning behind capital structure is to raise funds.
The other meaning behind capital structure is to hold a strategic mix that increase profits in the long run, for instance tax shields.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

a firm needs funds to start a new project. Ultimately, what determines the choice of capital structure?

A

The effect that the capital structure has on the NPV of the expansions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What choices do we typically consider when raising funds?

A

Raise funds by issuing equity.

Raise funds by borrowing money.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In perfect capital markets, what is the effect of the law of one price in regards to choice of capital structure?

A

Should not matter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the beta here?

A

Beta of 1 due to how the project has two states, and the economy has two states, and they swing together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How much would investors be willing to pay for the equity in this project, given that it is all-equity financed?

A

we know that the law of one price say that the price is equal to the cash generated by the assets in this case, since no cash from the asseets are allocated to creditors.

Therefore, investors view the project liek this: if I invest in it, how much do I get back?
The project leaders view: I need X money to start it, and I will get Y in return.

From the perspective of the investor, the assets generate expected value $1150.
We discount using the cost of capital: 15% –> present value of $1000.

Since the project’s assets generate cash flow worth $1000, this is the price for the entire equity of the project.

Now, since the owner of the project only need $800 to fund it, he essentially receives $200. This is the project’s NPV. This illustrate how the current owners of the firm receives this additional value if the firm initiate a new NPV positive project.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What do we call equity in a firm that has no debt?

A

unlevered equity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In our simple world, when can we say that using debt to raise funds is risk free?

A

If we know that the project will always generate cash flows that can pay the debt, then the debt is risk free.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What do we call equity in a firm that has outstanding debt?

A

Levered equity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is important regarding levered equity?

A

Payments to debt holder must take place before payment to equity holders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Suppose the firm decides to borrow 500. What happens in the various scenarios, given interest of 5%.

A

Strong economy: 1400 up, less the 525 we owe the debt holders = $875.
Weak economy: 900 up, less 525 we owe, = $375.

notice how the debt holders receive the same cash regardless.
Equity holders are significantly more fucked though, if the economy is weak.
We need to raise 800, and 500 is through debt, which require 300 from equity.

The question then becomes : What should the levered equity sell for?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

According to Modigliani and Miller, what should the levered equity sell for?

A

According to them, in perfect capital markets, the total value of the firm should not depend on capital structure. Their reasoning is that the same underlying assets still generate the same cash flows, and this is what we use to find present value.
The only differnece is how much of the cash flows that are being sent to debt holders and how much of it is being sent to equity holders.

If the assets generate $1000 in presnet value, then this is the total value of the firm. If the value of debt is 500, the value of the equity must be equal to 500 as well.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

equity is less valuable when a portion is financed through debt, vs when it is all equity (naturally) because the assets generate hte same cash flows. How does this affect existing owners of the project?

A

It doesnt. He will raise $1000, but hte cost is only $800.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why is this wrong?

A

It is wrong because it discount using only equity cost of capital.

The reason for this is that the levered equity makes it more risky, which means that we need to use a different discount rate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why is levered equity more risky than unlevered equity+

A

Levered equity is more risky because the effect leverage has on equity holders is relatively bigger than all equity. So that if the project suffer a little bit, equity holders are more fucked if there is a debt part there compared to as if the debt part is not there.

Recall from the example: All equity: 1400 or 900. Debt+equity mix: 875 or 375. Since the debt is worht 500, and the project value is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

elaborate on the argument of capital structure made by Modigliani and Miller

A

They argued that in perfect capital markets, the choice of capital structure does not matter. their reasoning is that the underlying assets still produce the very same cash flows. By the law of one price, the cash flows produced by the assets (present value) must equal to the total price of them, regardless of whether they are all equity, or debt and equity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

elaborate on the effect that levered equity has on equity holder’s demand

A

levered equity is more risky than unlevered equity. This is because the use of equity will amplify the returns in either case/outcome.

For instance, say some assets of a project will generate $1400 if economy is strong, and $900 if economy is weak.
If we do all-equity, we can find the expected value, which is $1150, and then use CAPM to find the required return. Since the project follow the economy in a binary way, it is correlated, and we use beta of 1.
required return = rf + beta(E[Rmkt] - rf) = 5% + 1(10%) = 15%

Then we would discount using 15%: 1150/1.15 = $1000

This means, when using all equity to finance the project, the equity is equal to $1000.

Then let us consider the mix of debt and equity. We borrow $500 at the risk free rate.
We can consider the debt risk free since we know we can repay it regardless.
Since 500 is done thourhg debt, there are 500 remainig that must be funded through equity.
Let us consider cash flows:
Strong economy: Debt holders receive $525. Equity holders receive $875.
Weak economy: Debt holders receive $525. Equity holders receive $375.
HOWEVER: The equity holders originally purchased the equity for $500, because this is what the value the assets produce is. the value is equal regardless of capital structure. recall why this is. (arbitrage).
Therefore, we can see that one outcome is positive, and the other is actually negative. The returns are now amplified.

All-equity had returns of 1400/1000 = 40% and 900/1000 = -10% with expected returns of 15%.

debt-equity mix has returns of (equity perspective) 875/500 = 75%, and 375/500 = -25%, with expected value 25%.

This example highlights the fact that when using debt, the EQUITY (levered equity) becomes risky. And since the levered equity is more risky, equity holders will demand a larger expected return to compensate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Can we increase risk of equity if there is no risk of default?

A

Yes obviously. this is because adding debt will make the equity more risky because it will amplify the returns in either direction. We have to be mindful of this, because levered equity can be quite volatile.

18
Q

briefly name the relationship between levered equity and required return

A

More levered (more risky) force the required return to be higehr

19
Q

name exactly the “size” /”metric” that is directly associated with systematic risk in beta

A

excess return.

19
Q

What is the relatioship between equity cost of capital and debt?

A

Adding debt, meaning that the equity goes from unlevered to levered, will increase the equity cost of capital. This basically means that the equity holders will require a higher return to be compensated for the additional risk imposed by the debt.

20
Q

What do we use to argue that the choice of capital structure does not matter in regards to the total value of the firm?

A

law of one price –> arbitrage opportunities cannot exist/should not exist.

Also, recall total value of the firm. This highlights the fact that we are not saying that equity/market cap is worth the same. In fact, adding debt will reduce the market cap as long as the underlying assets remain the same.
Total value of the firm highights the fact that we only change the allocation of hte cash flows that are produced by hte firms assets.

20
Q

Define perfect capital markets

A

Perfect capital markets have the follownig conditions apply:

1) Investors and firms can trade securities at competitive market prices, with the same level of availability, and the competitive market prices are equal to the present value of the cash flows produced by the firm’s assets.

2) There are not taxes, no transaction costs, or issuance costs related to the trading of securities

3) The firms choice of finanacing does not change the underlying assets, and the value that they will generate.

20
Q

What can potentially break MM1?

A

If the cash flows generated by the assets are affected by the capital structure

21
Q

MM proposition 1

A

In perfect capital markets, the total value of hte firm’s securities is equal to the present value of the cash flows that hte assets produce, and is not affected by the choice of capital structure.

22
Q

what is homemade leverage?

A

Homemade leverage refers to the case where an investor wants to buy a share in a firm, but is not happy with their dbet situauiton, and create more leverage by investing more in the firm using margin. This way, he can amplify his returns the same way as if the firm did it.

This is shown on the image. We can see how the original position is all equity, and cost 1000. However, the investor borrow 500 and use 500 of his own equity. This create the same old split as before. the difference is that now, the investor is the one who must pay the creditors the 525 before he gets the slice. This is virtually the exact same situaiton as if the firm used leverage,

23
Q

Say a firm use a mix of equity and debt (levered equity). As an investor, we want ot buy, but we do not want the added risk of the levered equity. What do we do?

A

We purcahse the total firm, meaning that instead of only buying equity, we buy the debt as well. this will make us have a claim to the entire cash flow.

24
Q

Main core outcome of MM1?

A

Capital structure does not alter the value of FIRM as a total

25
Q

define market value balance sheet

A

market value balance sheet is similar to the accounting balance sheet, but with some major differences:

1) Use current market value instead of historical acquisition cost
2) All assets are included, including brand and human capital and all that. Same with liabilities, all kinds of liabilities are included

26
Q

What is the purpose of the market value balance sheet?

A

To represent the fact that it is the firms choices in terms of choosing NPV positive projects that create value. If we hold the cash flows fixed, changing the capital structure will not change the total value of the firm.

27
Q

What is a leveraged recapitalization?

A

A firm that use borrowed funds to purchase its own shares

28
Q

elaborate on the process of a leveraged recapitalization

A

CORE IDEA: This is a financial transacation that does not change anything regartding the cash flows that hte firm is able to produce. Therefore, it is a zero-NPV transaction.

If the firm was all equity, and then purcahse back some shares using borrwoed funds, the portion of the firm that is finanaced through debt is given directly by this amount. Since the total value of the firm must remain the same (assets remain the same) then we know that the equity value must fall by exactly the same amount that the debt increased by.
Since we have used the funds to buy shares, the number of shares outstanding is now smaller than before. By using the new market value of equity divided by the sahres outstanding, we find the new share price. Since it is a zero-NPV transaction, the share price is exactly the same.

Why share price still same? Consider the position of a current equity holder. The firm perform a zero NPV transaction. Why the fuck would he be better of?

29
Q

What is the market value balance sheet used for?

A

Understand how the transacations affect the value of the firm. Accoutning balance sheets are al lfucked up. The goal of the market value sheet is to directly see the connection between a capital strucutre change and the influence this has on the firm’s value.

30
Q

According to MM1, what is the relationship between the market value of equity, debt, and unlevered market value of equity and the value of assets?

A

E + D = U = A

The total market value of the firm is always equal to the market value of its assets, regardless of whether the firm is levered or not.

31
Q

How do we find the returns of the unlevered equity, when the firm use debt and equity?

A

We do the average weighted: r_u = E/(E+D) r_e + D/(E+D) r_d

32
Q

Consider this equation. what is the additional risk compensaiton that follow from using debt?

A

We can find it by sovling for equiry returns:

Re = (Ru - D/(E+D)Rd)(E+D)/E

Re = Ru(E+D)/E - Rd (D/E)

Re = RuE/E + RuD/E - Rd(D/E)

Re = Ru + D/E (Ru - Rd)

Here we can see that the required return from the equity is equal to the unlevered return plus the debt-equity ratio multilplied by the differnece in returns from teh unlevered and the debt

33
Q

what is MM2?

A

The cost of capital of levered equity INCREASE with the increase in debt-equity ratio

34
Q

What can we say about a firm’s WACC?

A

It is independent of the capital structure, assuming PERFECT CAPITAL MARKETS. In such a case, WACC is alwyas equa lto the unlevered cost of capital

35
Q

Why are we always talking about share repurchases? Why not just add debt on top of already existing shite?

A

This would alter the underlying assets. A key assumptiuon is that the assets remain the same, and in such scenarios, the transaction made is simply a zero NPV transaction. We are only looking at changing the capital structure.

36
Q

Can using leverage increase EPS?

A

Yes. But this does not mean that the stock price should icnrease. this is because the risk involved has increased.The key is that the EXPECTED earnings per share might increase. The keyword “expected” is crucial because is highlights how there is now more risk involved. there is a greater probability that we are actually fucked now that we have introduced levered equity.

As long as there are perfect capital markets, the shareholders are not better off with tchanging the structure.

37
Q

Will EPS increase with more leverage?

A

It can, but it does not have to.

38
Q

elaborate on the statement that “issuing shares will dilute existing shareholders’ ownership, so debt is preferable”

A

Dilution refers to the case where issuing more shares means that the cake is now split among more people. THerefore, you have less a claim now than before.

This is wrong, because when we issue the shares, the firms equity is also worth more because the firm raise the money. So, we split the cash flows on more shares, but there is also more to split.

The key here is the share price used to issue the equity. As long as it is “fair”, there is no change in value per share.

39
Q

elaborate on the “conservation of value principle” for financial markets

A

A financial transaction can neither destroy nor create value. It only repackage the product.

This applies to perfect capital markets.

40
Q
A