Chapter 14 Flashcards
Timeline of religious changes under Edward
FIX
Feb 1546
Denunciation of images in London
Jul 1547
Issue of royal injunctions which are radical in nature
Dec 1547
Dissolution of the chantries
Jan
Act of Uniformity, which laid down the publication of the Book of Common Prayer
May 1549
Mar 1552
Book of Common Prayer introduced
Second Act of Uniformity, which laid down the publication of the second Book of Common Prayer
Dec 1552
Jun 1553
Revised Book of Common Prayer introduced
Forty-Two Articles of Religion published
Somerset overall approach to religious change
Religious policy under Edward VI saw a considerable move in the direction of Protestantism. Somerset himself seems to have been a genuine, albeit somewhat late, convert to Protestantism, and he welcomed religious radicals such as John Hooper and Thomas Becon into his household.
For the most part, religious policy under Somerset proved cautious. This is exemplified by the moderate Book of Common Prayer written in 1549 by Archbishop Cranmer, who was himself cautious by temperament and anxious to avoid an increase in religious tension. However, a much more radical approach was adopted in some areas, despite the reluctance of public opinion to embrace religious reform. In fact, Somerset’s period of power experienced a sustained attack on popular religious practice, particularly in London.
1549 Book of Common Prayer
Book of Common Prayer written in 1549 by Archbishop Cranmer, who was himself cautious by temperament and anxious to avoid an increase in religious tension. It had two key objectives: it established a single form for services within the Church of England and it translated the services into English to enhance understanding of the key texts. It therefore simply translated into English many of the traditional Latin services. Indeed, it included an ambiguous Eucharistic declaration which the Catholic Bishop Gardiner, a prisoner in the Tower, thought could still imply the acceptance of transubstantiation.
How widespread was Protestantism at start of reign and stats
Convinced Protestants were in a small minority at the start of Edward’s reign. Susan Brigden has suggested in The Reformation in London
(1991) that roughly 20 per cent of Londoners were Protestant by 1547, which does mean, of course, that 80 per cent were not. The leaders of London Protestantism, especially Nicholas Ridley, were a vocal lobby who were well placed among Somerset’s supporters. Kent, East Sussex, Essex, Bristol and the East Anglian ports were other places with entrenched Protestant minorities. Elsewhere, it was almost non-existent. Meanwhile, Catholic survivalism remained strong in the north, especially Lancashire, in Midland counties such as Staffordshire and Worcestershire, and in the far south-west (look ahead to Chapter 16, page 157, for a map of the distribution of Catholic and Protestant areas in the UK at this time).
Social impact of Somerset’s religious changes
The social impact of these religious changes was highly significant, given that they amounted to a sustained attack on the religious experience of ordinary people, and enabled a renewed plundering of the Church’s resources.
The injunctions of 1547 attacked many traditional Catholic practices. The subsequent attack on chantries and the plundering of their assets by the Crown destroyed one means of connecting the dead to the communities of which they had once been part, whilst the attack on guilds and confraternities meant that the Crown confiscated money and property which had previously underpinned charitable activities, feasts and celebrations. There was widespread fear that this would only be the start of systematic asset stripping of the Church.
1547 injunctions and why introduced
Attacked many features of popular
Catholicism, such as lights, images, stained glass, processions and practices associated with Candlemas, Ash Wednesday and Palm Sunday. Reflected radical attitudes in government.
Dissolution of chantries and religious guilds and why
Chantries, guilds and lay brotherhoods abolished and their property seized by Crown. This represented a further attack on popular Catholicism. Crown needed money to pay for expensive foreign policy.
Why was the 1549 Book of Common Prayer introduced
Need for uniform approach to religious services
Denunciation of images in London and why
Reflected radical attitudes among churchmen, especially Nicholas Ridley. Ridley was supported both within government and by Protestant activists within London who engaged in widespread iconoclasm.
Northumberland religious objectives
Northumberland had a twofold strategy in relation to the Church:
1. He wished to continue the Protestant reforms initiated by Somerset.
2. He sought to plunder more of its wealth.
Reasons Northumberland’s tenure saw increased radical policy (4)
- The tactically cautious Cranmer was beginning to move in a more radical direction. This was reflected in the much more radical Book of Common Prayer which he introduced in 1552.
- More radical senior clergy such as Nicholas Ridley, Bishop of London, and the even more radical John Hooper, Bishop of Gloucester, were becoming more influential
- Eminent continental reformers such as Martin Bucer and Peter Martyr had moved to England and were becoming influential in decisions on religious matters. Moreover, there were very close links between many English reformers and the Swiss reformer, Heinrich Bullinger of Zurich, who had carried on the Zwinglian Reformation in that city.
- Most importantly it reflected the increasing influence, as the reign progressed, of Edward VI on the policy making process. The king took his role as head of the Church very seriously and believed it was his mission to destroy idolatry.
What does Zwinglian mean
The term Zwinglian refers to the religious ideas of Ulrich Zwingli (1484-
1531), a Protestant reformer from Zurich in Switzerland; his ideas, which were more radical than those of Martin Luther, were the most important continental influence on the English Church during Edward VI’s reign; in Zwingl’s view the Eucharist was simply a commemoration of Christ’s sacrifice, and no transformation in the ‘elements’ (the bread and the wine) took place.
Forty-Two articles of religion
The firmly Protestant nature of official doctrine was confirmed in Cranmer’s Forty-Two Articles of Religion, although these left some ambiguity between competing varieties of Protestantism.
The Forty-Two Articles were issued by Archbishop Cranmer in June 1553 and defined the essentials of the faith of the Church of England. As such, they reflected the influence on Cranmer of the Swiss reformers Zwingli and Bullinger. They confirmed the firmly reformed path along which the Church had headed in Edward VIs reign.
However, the king’s death within a few weeks of their issue meant that they were never implemented. A revised and more moderate version, the Thirty-Nine Articles, was adopted in Elizabeth’s reign.
Changes under 1552 Book of Common Prayer
- Removal of remaining ‘conservative’ ceremonies
No longer fitted in with the regime’s religious radicalism. Conservatives could no longer find anything in the prayer book which they could accept - Rewriting of baptism, confirmation and burial services
To make services more easily understood by congregations. Showed Cranmer’s desire to see greater simplicity in church services. - Radical reform of communion service, including replacement of wafer by ordinary bread. Showed influence of Zwinglianism in the Eucharistic declaration, ‘Do this in remembrance that Christ’s blood was shed for thee’.
Need for decisive change from ambiguity of 1549 prayer book - Ban on use of ‘popish’ vestments
Seen as objects of ‘superstition’. Simpler clerical vestments were seen as more in keeping with the simpler approach to services - Restriction on use of church music
Moderate Protestants thought that church music hindered religious understanding; radical opinion considered it idolatrous. Simpler approach to music reflected the emphasis on greater simplicity in church services
Northumberland’s plundering of Church wealth
In addition to the adoption of a more strongly Protestant approach, the Crown, still in financial difficulties after the ruinous expenditure of the protectorate, pursued a systematic policy of asset stripping, extracting wealth from the Church through the plundering of the property of bishoprics. For example, the dioceses of Gloucester and Worcester were combined, with two thirds of the Worcester estate going to the Crown; the bishops of Exeter and Winchester made substantial grants’ from their property to the Crown; and there was a plan, never implemented, to divide the bishopric of Durham and to appropriate much of its wealth to the Crown.
The crisis at parish level was made worse by fear of a Crown attack on church plate. Many parishes tried to avoid this by selling their treasures. Such actions proved justified because in January 1553 the Crown started to confiscate church plate, although some resourceful parishes were able to hide their treasures. Not only was this an attack on the assets of parishes, it was also, as Eamon Duffy has argued, an attack on the history and collective memory of each parish, which encouraged a ‘climate of discontent and disobedience.