Chapter 1 - The Consolidation Of Power Flashcards

1
Q

How did Henry come to the throne?

A

He acceded following his victory over Richard III’s forces at the Battle of Bosworth on 22 August 1485. This victory terminated Plantagenet rule in England, and saw the establishment of a new dynasty, the Tudors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why was it essential for him to consolidate his power by establishing his dynasty and ensuring that any rivals to the throne were dealt with firmly?

A

Because his grasp of power was insecure; he had virtually no discernible claim to the throne and he had many enemies who were only too keen to see him experience the same fate as his immediate predecessor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why was his claim to the throne weak?

A

Henrys claim to the throne was weak in two respects:

  1. He was descended through the female line represented by his mother, Lady Margaret Beaufort.
  2. More importantly, the line came from John of Gaunt’s third wife: their son John Beaufort had been born before their marriage and was therefore seen as illegitimate.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why did Henry become the Lancastrian claimant?

A

Only because there was no one else who could fulfil the role. In reality, however, it was victory on the battlefield alone which had brought him to the throne.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Henry had lived abroad since what age?

A

14

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What happened at Henry’s trip to London as the new monarch and what was the reaction of the people?

A

He journeyed to London where on 3 September 1485 Henry was met by the lord mayor of the city. The London public was wooed by pageantry and ceremony into cheering the new monarch. In truth, by this point Richard
had become such an obiect of suspicion because of the disappearance of the princes in the lower, along with other presumed crimes, that it mattered little who Henry was and how slender was his claim to the throne. That he was not Richard was enough for the public to accept him.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who proclaimed Henry king on the battlefield at Bosworth?

A

Lord Stanley

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was Henry’s background before he became king?

A

Henry VII had not been brought up to rule. In 1471, when Henry was 14, Edward IV regained power for the House of York in the Battle of lewkesbury,
in which many of Henrys relations, the Lancastrians, died or were executed.
Henry fled to France, where he lived for most of the time as a fugitive in the Duchy of Brittany. To the historian Thomas Penn, Henry’s ability to think like a fugitive proved to be useful political training for his future as a ruler.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Henry’s main priority after he acceded?

A

to ensure that he kept his throne, mindful as he was that four monarchs from the previous hundred years had met untimely ends themselves. Therefore, his primary aim at the start of his reign was to consolidate his power, which he did by a number of political
actions combined with military success.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Methods/actions by which Henry consolidated his power after he came to the throne?

A

He did it by a number of political
actions combined with military success. Henry immediately consolidated his power in a number of ways:

. He dated his reign from 21 August 1485, the day before the Battle of Bosworth, thereby ensuring that anyone who had fought on the Yorkist side could be designated a traitor.

He publicly rewarded many of his key supporters, for example by conferring 11 knighthoods.

He arranged for supporters to detain Elizabeth of York, daughter of Edward IV, and the Earl of Warwick, Edward IV’s nephew, each of whom could be seen as having a much greater claim to the throne than Henry himsell.

• He made key appointments to his Council and household, for example making Sir Reginald Bray Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Sir William Stanley Chamberlain of the Household.

He arranged his coronation to take place on 30 October before the meeting of his first Parliament on 7 November, thereby demonstrating that his
right to the throne was based on hereditary right and not onlv because parliament had sanctioned it.

Parliamentary Acts of Attainder against Yorkists who had fought at Bosworth ensured that their property was forfeit to the Crown, thereby
increasing roval income. This was further enhanced when Parliament granted Henry the customs revenues of tonnage and poundage for life

Having had her detained the previous year, in January 1486 Henry married Elizabeth of York, the daughter of King Edward IV. By waiting until the other stens towards consolidation of power nad been completed. Henry was able to ensure that his assumption of the Crown was not brought about by his wife’s own claim to the throne. However, he was able to exploit in royal propaganda the union of the two houses of Lancaster and York. For example, the emblem of the Tudor rose combined the red rose of Lancaster with the white rose of York.

A vital step in the securing of the dynasty took place in September 1489 with the birth of an heir to the throne. Prince Arthur.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why was there potential for threats to his throne from pretenders?

A

Many Yorkists, not satisfied by his marriage to Elizabeth, still regarded him as a usurper. There were several potential Yorkist claimants to the throne, such as the earls of Warwick and Lincoln, Edward IV’s nephews and the situation was complicated by the appearance of pretenders to the throne who were allegedly either Edward V or his younger brother Richard, the two murdered ‘princes in the Tower’. However, what Henry had to fear most was the influence of Margaret of Burgundy, the sister of Edward IV and Richard III. Margaret was never reconciled to the Tudor takeover and, as the dowager duchess of Burgundy, she had access to funds which enabled her to encourage the ambitions of Yorkist claimants.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When was Viscount Lovell and Stafford’s threat, who was involved and what happened?

A

Easter 1486

It was led by Francis, Viscount Lovell - who had prospered as a key supporter of Richard III - and Humphrey and Thomas Stafford.

Lovell tried to raise a rebellion in Richard IlI’s heartland of support in the North Riding of Yorkshire.
Simultaneously, Stafford tried to raise forces against Henry, drawing upon another area of Yorkist support in the Midlands. Lovell managed to escape from the king’s forces, but Humphrey Stafford was captured and executed, though his younger brother and accomplice, Thomas, was pardoned. What seems significant about this rising is how little enthusiasm there was at this stage for a Yorkist rising in their traditional heartlands. It was easily suppressed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Change in strategy after Lovell rebellion (for rebels):

A

Following the Lovell rebellion, leading Yorkists realised that a change in
strategy was needed it they were to be successful in their attempts to get rid of Henry VII. There were two key aspects to this. Firstly, they needed a figurehead who could claim to be a Yorkist prince and, secondly, they needed the financial support to generate a significant military threat to Henry. Their figurehead was Lambert Simnel.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

1st Simnel threat:

A

Simnel was being passed off as the Earl of Warwick, who had been imprisoned by Henry, and was even crowned as King Edward in Ireland in May 1487. The conspiracy was put together by John de la Pole, the Earl of Lincoln, himself a potential Yorkist claimant. In response to this hoax, Henry now had the real Earl of Warwick exhibited in London for all to see. Lincoln subsequently fled from Henry VIl’s court and had joined the failed plotter Lord Lovell at the court of Margaret of Burgundy in the Netherlands. They persuaded Margaret to support Simnels bogus claim and to pay for a force of mercenaries to invade England.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Rebellion of the Earl of Lincoln

A

Lincoln and Lovell persuaded Margaret to support Simnels bogus claim and to pay for a force of mercenaries to invade England.
Henry had plenty of notice that a rebellious conspiracy was being planned, and thus he had ample opportunity to plan his response. Given that Richard Ill’s main power base was in the north of England, Henry took the gamble of reinstating the rather untrustworthy Earl of Northumberland, who led a major portion of Richard III’s army at the Battle of Bosworth, to power in the north.
This helped to neutralise Richard’s old power base and also ensured that the traditionally Yorkist Howard family had no intention of joining the conspiracy, as Northumberland was one of their descendants. He also reinforced coastal defences in East Anglia. However, the rebels landed on the northwest coast of England in Cumberland, and crossed the Pennines in order to drum ur support in Richard Ill’s old heartland in the North Riding of Yorkshire. In actual fact the Yorkist gentry of the North Riding were reluctant to commit themselves wholeheartedly to the cause, presumably waiting to see who was likely to win. Henry gathered a group of advisors, which included the close relatives of former Yorkists who had been victims of Richard Ill, in the south and Midlands. The two armies met at East Stoke near Newark in Nottinghamshire.
Henry himself was not confident. He could remember only too vividly how Richard had been double-crossed at Bosworth and feared that he himself might suffer the same fate. However, his army, led effectively by the Earl of Oxford, held firm and the Earl of Lincoln was killed in the battle, having crucially been unable to add sufficient followers to the army of mercenaries with which he had landed in England.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Henry’s actions following and significance of Battle of Stoke Field?

A

Henry’s victory at the Battle of Stoke Field was very significant. It was this battle rather than Bosworth which really brought an end to the Wars of the Roses, and Henry’s position became safer though by no means completely secure. Henry had been faced with a crisis which he had overcome by a combination of his own shrewdness and hard work, the organisational skills and military leadership of his key supporters and the willingness of landowners in many parts of the country to support his cause. He was relatively mild in his treatment of many of those who had rebelled, in the process weakening the resolve of many Yorkists to oppose him. He also began to develop the policy of using bonds of good behaviour to ensure well.
behaved landowners who might otherwise face financial ruin.

17
Q

Background of Perkin Warbeck

A

Perkin Warbeck, a cloth trader from Tournai in Flanders, was a persistent irritant to Henry VII over a period of eight years, during which he claimed to be Richard, Duke of York. Had his activities been confined to England he might have been dismissed as a deluded pest. However, it was his ability to
attract patronage from foreign rulers which transformed him from an irritant to a potentially serious threat. It also demonstrated how fragile Henry’s position was considered to be by other rulers.

18
Q

Threats from Warbeck

A

In 1491 Warbeck began to impersonate Richard, Duke of York in Ireland.
After a brief appearance at the court of Charles VIll of France, the following year, he was forced to flee from France, to the court of Margaret of Burgundy, where he was trained as a potential Yorkist prince and began to draw English:
courtiers into his conspiracies
Several years after the Battle of Stoke in 1487, Warbeck’s first attempt to land in England in 1495 proved to be a fiasco. Henry had been informed of Warbeck’s intentions by one of his royal agents, Sir Robert Clifford, who had infiltrated Warbeck’s retinue. Warbeck was quickly defeated, and fled to the court of James IV of Scotland.
However. it would be a mistake to write oft this event simply as a farce which had no chance of success. In actual fact, it could have proved verv costly for Henry because the conspirators had an accomplice in the heart of Henry’s government, Sir William Stanley. Stanley, Henry’s step-uncle and potential traitor, was Lord Chamberlain and headed the roval household at a time when household government was still the normal model of political operation. The modern historian Christine Carpenter believes it was therefore striking that this conspiracy actually revealed Henry at his most vulnerable in the very place where he should have been
In 1496. a small Scottish force crossed the border on Warbecks behalf but
Quickly retreated. Warbecks interests were soon sacriliced When james gave in to Henry’s offer of marriage to his daughter, Margaret. Having failed to successfully invade England from Scotland in 1496, Warbeck made a final attempt to seek the English throne by trying to exploit the uncertainties created by the Cornish Rebellion in 1497, but his forces were crushed and Warbeck eventually surrendered to the king. Henry, remarkably lenient at
first, allowed Warbeck to stay at court, but confined him to the Tower after he tried to abscond. This time there was to be no mercy. Having allegedly tried to escape with the Earl of Warwick, he was accused of treason, and they were both tried and executed.

19
Q

Significance of Earl of Warwick’s execution in 1499?

A

It was highly convenient for Henry that Warbeck’s final attempts at conspiracy enabled him to get rid of the Earl of Warwick, potentially the most obvious Yorkist claimant to the throne. He met his fate in 1499; having been accused of plotting with Perkin Warbeck against Henry VII, he was beheaded.

20
Q

Threat posed by Edmund de la Pole, Earl of Suffolk and Richard de la Pole,
‘The White Rose’ and their fate?

A

The final piece of dynastic security concerned Edmund de la Pole, Earl of Suffolk, and Richard de la Pole, younger brothers of the Earl of Lincoln.

-Suffolk had fled to Flanders in 1498. He was persuaded to return after a short exile, but once again fled in 1501, this time seeking refuge at the court of the Emperor Maximilian. For as long as Margaret of Burgundy was politically opposed to Henry VII, Suffolk was safe. However, with the Treaty of Windsor in 1506, more friendly relations were restored. One teature of this improvement in relations was that Maximilian agreed to give up Suffolk, who was duly imprisoned in the Tower of London. Henry VII took no further action against him. However, Henry VIII had him executed for treason in 1513.

-This still left Richard de la Pole, nicknamed the ‘White Rose, at large during his time in exile, but he was killed fighting for the French forces at the Battle of Pavia in 1525.

21
Q

Henry’s long-term aims?

A

He aimed to ensure the succession of his line to the throne, ensure law and order by keeping control over the nobility who had engaged in bitter power struggles, improve the crowns minancial position and stabilise the avnasty by securing the recognition of toreign powers

22
Q

Degree of success in consolidating his power and establishing his dynasty?

A

It is clear that Henry enjoyed some success in consolidating his power and establishing his dynasty. How much of this was due to his own actions and qualities and how much was the consequence of the way in which the Yorkists had become demoralised even before the death of Richard IlI is open to debate.
It should not be assumed that his victory at the Battle of Stoke left Henry in an unchallengeable position; Henry himself certainly did not think so. The immediate threat from the House of York might have been vanquished and many Yorkists had made their peace, albeit reluctantly in some cases, with the regime.
The immediate threat from his own relative Sir William Stanley had not, however, been vanquished, as the crisis with Warbeck of 1497 made only too clear. There had certainly been royal leadership, though whether it was as unquestioned as Wallace MacCaffrey and John Guy have suggested, is open to some doubt.