Chapter 13 Flashcards
The Connected Mind: Social Psychology
ultrasocial species
species that form large societies, divide labour, cooperate, and have food management systems (e.g. agriculture)
four examples of ultrasocial species
- ants
- bees
- termites
- mole rats
Humans are considered ultrasocial because…
they demonstrate most (but, not all) ultrasocial characteristics
social psychology
the study of the causes and consequences of being social
The social behaviours of animals are typically governed by…
resource availability
cooperation vs. competition
- cooperation is working together toward a common goal
- competition is struggling with one another to obtain limited resources
aggression
behaviour with the purpose of harmoing one another
cooperation and competition both serve this same purpose
survival
the prisoner’s dilemma
You and your friend are arrested, but the police have limited evidence against you. Without being able to communicate with your partner, you are given the choice to confess or to remain silent. If you both remain silent, you will each be sentenced to one year. If you both confess, you will each receive ten years. However, if one confesses and the other remains silent, the prisoner who confesses will be set free, and the silent prisoner will receive a 20-year sentence.
This is a classic model of competition and cooperation. Cooperation is moderately rewarded (a one-year sentence), while competition is punished (ten years). If only one of you confesses, however, the confessor is highly rewarded (freedom), while the other person is severely punished (20 years).
the tit-for-tat (TFT) strategy
you make cooperation your first move, and then repeat your partner’s successive moves
- it is nice (cooperation first)
- allows for retaliation (competition after your partner competes)
- allows for forgiveness (cooperation after your partner cooperates
social loafing
reaping the benefits of cooperation without putting in the same effort (e.g. certain group members carrying a project)
in-groups
collections of people often cooperation together, due to having something in common (e.g. families, teams, religions, ethnicities)
prejudice
- judgments made before meeting individuals
- often positive prejudice (positive assumptions) to in-groups and negative prejudice (negative assumptions) to out-groups
discrimination
- unequal treatment/sharing
- often positive discrimination (better treatment) to in-groups, and negative discrimination (worse treatment) to out-groups
the onset of human biases
- prejudice and discrimination is deeply engrained in human evolution
- present in non-human primates
- arises early in childhood
experiment on infant/children preferences
- 5-6 month olds looked more at native speakers, than non-native speakers
- 10 month olds were more likely to take a toy from native speaker, than non-native speakers when offered
- 5 year olds would rather be friends with a native speaker their age, than a non-native speaker their age
the impact of experience with diversity on group biases
increased experience with diversity decreases group biases (e.g. white students with Black teachers are less likely to show discrimination to Black people)
implicit biases (or unexamined beliefs)
group biases that we are unaware of
the Implicit Association Test
- measures biases that we are unable (not unwilling) to report ourselves
- you categorize words into groups as quickly as possible
- you’ll categorize words slower and less accurately if it doesn’t match implicit biases
social facilitation
- the presence of other people changes individual performance
- can be positive (e.g. practicing best with a team) or negative (e.g. choking during a performance)
group cognition
group decision-making
four problematic patterns of group cognition
- group polarization: making more extreme decisions (e.g. individual jurors often want softer punishments than a riled up grand jury)
- groupthink: reaching a consensus too quickly, agreeing is easier than disagreeing
- diffusion of responsibility: worse decisions often made due to less responsibility for your actions when with others as opposed to yourself, “mob mentality”
- common knowledge effect: only talking about information everybody knows, no new information inputted
the frustration-aggression hypothesis
- animals are aggressive when their desires are frustrated (i.e. scarcity of resources)
- e.g. Animal A frustrates Animal B’s desire for food, so Animal B attacks Animal A.
two reasons researchers think the frustration-aggression hypothesis is too narrow
- humans can aggress when feeling negative emotions or pain
- seasonal variation in aggression (higher in summer in the Northern hemisphere)