Chapter 13 Flashcards
Sumner (1906) Before Contact Hypothesis
intergroup contact leads to more conflict and negative intergroup attitudes
Williams (1947) initial ideas for contact hypothesis
benefits of contact on racial attitudes
Allport (1953) Positive Features:
Equal Status Between Group Members
doesn’t mean group members are equal in status, but in intergroup conversations
Allport (1953) Positive Features:
Common Goals
active effort by group members toward shared goal
Allport (1953) Positive Features:
Intergroup Cooperation
attainment of common goals achieved through interdependent effort based on cooperative interdependence not competition
Jigsaw Classroom
classrooms situated so that students need to work together to reach common goals, shown to reduce prejudice
Allport (1953) Positive Features:
Support of Authorities, Laws or Customs
intergroup contact has positive benefits when backed by explicit support from institutions and authorities; laws can forbid and encourage interactions
Later work suggests Allport’s 4 positive features can be reduced to two
Opportunity for development of intergroup friendships, and presence of one or more of Allport’s positive features
Intergroup Contact and Intergroup Friendships
when friendship used as a measure of prejudice reduction, cross-group friendships are associated with less prejudice than when other outcome measures used
Davies & Aron (2016) Interpersonal Processes in Cross-Group Friendships
Self Disclosure: exchange of personal info encourages reciprocal trust and creates emotional bonds
New Directions in Intergroup Contact
Negative situational factors that restrict effects of contact need to be considered; contact is more effective with some groups than others; emotional reactions to outgroups and history between groups affects contact hypothesis
Paollini et al (2016) argue one motivation for outgroup contact is ‘self-expansion’
Self-expansion is positive orientation toward others stemming from human motivation to expand self to increase one’s general self-efficacy; create relationships to acquire new resources, perspectives, and identities
Cooperative Learning Groups
Essential Features
Cooperative interdependence, divide work or rewards, considerable interaction between students, stress importance of each person’s contribution to goal
Cooperative Learning Groups
General Outcomes
improves academic achievement, intergroup relations, and opportunities to learn from others, base judgements on stereotypes, and positive interactions
Cognitive Dissonance Theory
argues tension is experienced when discrepancies in one’s prejudicial attitudes are revealed