Chapter 12 The Cognitive Perspective Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Cognitive Perspective- Basic Assumptions

A
  • Personality reflects decision making, and decision making is not always rational
  • How people represent experiences mentally
  • How people make decisions
  • Source of information
  • You integrate and organize the bits of information the world provides you.
  • The flow of life consists of an elaborate web of decisions
  • Some are conscious
  • Outside awareness
  • Mental organization -> personality (biases)
  • The flow of implicit decisions is less predictable than theorists used to think
  • How the mind is organized and how personality thus is structured
  • How events are represented in memory and how memories guide your experience of the world
  • How all this complexity is organized and used is an important issue from the cognitive vantage point.
  • George Kelly: cognitive theorists view people as implicit scientists
  • Use partial information to make inferences about the rest
  • Conserves mental resources
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Schemas

A
  • mental organizations of information (knowledge structures)
  • Roughly categories
  • Sometimes explicit
  • Sometimes implicit
  • Can include many kinds of elements: perceptual images, abstract knowledge, emotion qualities, and information about time sequence
  • Include information about specific cases called exemplars
  • Include information about the more general sense of what the category is
  • For any given category, you can bring to mind specific examples
  • You can also bring to mind a sense of the category as a whole- captured in an idealized best member of the category, often called it prototype
  • It’s an idealized member an average of those you’ve experienced so far
  • Organizing quality
  • Integrate meaning
  • Event: collection of people, movements, objects in use
  • But unless there’s a sense of what the event is about, the bits might just as well be random.
  • Once schemas have been developed -> recognize new experiences
  • By quickly (and mostly unconsciously) comparing them to the schemas
  • If the features of the new event resemble an existing schema -> recognized as “one of those”
  • Category: there’s a definition of what’s in it and what’s not, but that’s not always so
  • Contribute to its nature but often they aren’t necessary
  • Fuzzy set
  • The more criteria relevant -> more likely it will be seen as a category member
  • If there’s no required criterion, members can vary a lot in what attributes they do and don’t have.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Fuzzy set

A
  • the sense that a schema is defined in a vague way by a set of criteria that are relevant but not necessary.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Personal constructs

A
  • George Kelly: the uniqueness of each person’s subjective worldview
  • impose them on reality
  • People don’t experience the world directly but know it through the lens of their constructs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Effects of Schemas

A
  • Make it easy to put new information into memory
  • What information sticks depends on what schema you use
  • Tells where in the ongoing experience to look for information
  • Look for information related to the schema
  • Changing schemas changes what you look for -> notice different things
  • Schema-based biases -> self-perpetuating
  • Schemas tell you more than just where to look
  • Suggest what you’re going to find
  • You’re more likely to remember what confirms your expectation than what doesn’t
  • Make the schema more solid in the future -> more resistant to change
  • Default
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Default

A
  • something you assume is true unless you’re told otherwise

- Bring default information from memory to fill gaps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Semantic memory

A
  • organzied by meaning

* Categories of objects and concepts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Episodic memory

A
  • memory for events or episodes
  • Memory for experience in space and time
  • Elements of an event are strung together as they happened
  • Some are long and elaborate, and some are brief
  • A brief event can be stored both by itself and as part of a longer event
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Script

A
  • if you experience enough episodes of a given type -> schema for that class of episodes starts to form
  • A prototype of an event category
  • Used partly to perceive and interpret a common event
  • Provides a perception with a sense of duration and a sense of flow and change throughout the event
  • Defaults- things you assume to be true- supplied information to fill gaps in the story
  • Allow a lot of diversity, but each has a basic structure
  • When you encounter a new variation on it, you easily understand what’s going on.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Procedural knowledge

A
  • knowledge structures that pertain to actions
  • Structures about the process of doing, rather than the more passive process of perceiving and understanding
  • Sometimes means engaging in mental manipulations
  • Harder to gain conscious access to much of this knowledge base
  • Forms schematic structures that are used in different contexts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Social cognition

A

*personality and social psychologists began to study how the processes involved in forming categories apply to socially meaningful stimuli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Self-schema

A
  • The one you form about yourself
  • Little like self-concept, but also a little different
  • Provides you with a lot of default information
  • Tells you where to look for new information
  • Bias your recall, twisting your recollections so they fit better with how you see yourself now
  • Be larger and more complex
  • Spent more time noticing things about yourself
  • Incorporates both trait labels and information about concrete behaviors
  • Has more emotional elements than other schemas
  • Whether the self-schema is truly special
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Self schemas differ in the level of self complexity

A
  • Some people keep different self-aspects distinct from each other
  • Each role these people play, each goal they have, each activity they do has its own place in their self-image= high in self-complexity
  • Lower in self-complexity= self-aspects are less distinct, everything blends together
  • Feelings relating to a bad event in one aspect of life tend to spill over into other aspects of the self
  • Individuals with more complex self schemas are more protected from stress/emotional costs of failure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Possible selves (Markus)

A
  • selves they expect to become; selves they’d like to become; selves they’re afriad of becoming; disliked selves; selves they think they ought to be
  • Brought to bear as motivators, because they provide goals to approach or to avoid.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Entity schemas

A
  • Entity view: attend to and remember cues of consistency

* View of ability as fixed, leads to performance goals, helpless response, avoidance of challenge, loss of persistence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Incremental schemas

A
  • Incremental view: attend to and remember cues of change

* View of ability as malleable, leads to learning goals, mastery response, embrace challenge, increased persistence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Dweck and Leggett (1988): A Social-Cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality

A
  • Entity theorist: more likely to give up after challenges; tend to lost of persistence; don’t believe that hard-work is going to pay off
  • Incremental: embrace challenges; challenges as the ways to get better
  • Children is being labeled in early age -> danger of the labels
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Grant & Dweck: Clarifying Achievement Goals and Their Impact

A
  • Goal: Learning, Outcome, Ability, Normative
  • Are all learning goals better than performance goals? Not all performance goals are the same.
  • Learning: best types of goals (more coping)
  • Negative correlation with loss of intrinsic motivation and withdrawel of time and effort
  • Positive correlation with help-seeking and planning
  • Ability
  • Positive correlation with loss of intrinsic motivation and withdrawel of time and effort
  • Negative correlation with help-seeking and planning
  • If you have a learning goal, you are going to be more engage in deep processing, increase commitment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Attribution

A
  • inferring the cause of an event
  • People do this spontaneously, without even knowing they’re doing it
  • Relies partly on schemas about the nature of social situations
  • Default values -> make inferences beyond the information that’s present
  • Using different schemas -> make different inferences about the causes of events
20
Q

Weiner’s Attibutional Theory of Motivation and Emotion

A
  • Causes of success and failures: ability, effort, task difficulty, luck or chance factors
  • Locus of causality: internal (ability and effort); external (chance factors, task difficulty, powerful others)
  • Pride/Self Esteem vs. None
  • Vary in stability
  • Stable (ability)
  • Vary from one time to another (effort)
  • Hopelessness vs. Hopefulness
  • Controllability
  • Intentional vs. Not Intentional
  • Shame vs. Guilt (when self directed) (control but not do well vs. control but did not put enough effort)
  • Angry (intentionally to be bad) vs. Gratitude (wasn’t intentional and good outcome) vs. Pity (uncontrollable and lost job) (when other directed)
  • People generally tend to interpret their successes as having internal stable causes- their ability
  • People tend to see failures as caused by relatively unstable influences- bad luck or too little effort
  • Individual differences in attributional tendencies -> big effects
  • See failure as caused by unstable factors -> no need to worry about the future (the situation probably won’t be the same next time)
  • If the cause is stable -> see failures as caused by ability or the world is permanently against you -> face the same situation next time and every time -> your failure hold only more failure
  • Seeing stable and permanent reasons for bad life outcomes -> depression, sickness and death
21
Q

Nodes

A
  • areas of storage, are linked if they have a logical connection
  • Some are semantic -> linking attributes that contribute to a category
  • Others are episodic -> linking attributes that form an event
  • Bits of information that have a lot to do with each other are strongly linked
  • All knowledge is an elaborate web associations of different strengths among huge number of nodes of information
  • When a memory node is actived -> the information it contains is in consciousness
  • A node can be activated by an intentional search
  • As one node becomes active -> partial activation spreads to other nodes related to it
  • The stronger the relation -> the greater the degree of spreading
  • Makes it easier for the related area to come all the way to consciousness
  • Takes less of a boost to make it fully active
  • An extra boost sometimes comes from another source -> the node becomes active enough for its content to pop into awareness
  • If the node hadn’t already been partially active, the boost wouldn’t have been enough
22
Q

Priming

A
  • activating a node by a task that precedes the task of interest
    *First used to study two questions
    -Whether the same information is more accessible later on
    =It takes a while for the activation to fade
    =This partial activation would leave the node more accessible than before until the activation is gone.
    -Whether related information becomes more accessible after the priming
    =Yes
    *These effects occur only if the primed information can plausibly be applied to the later event.
    *Priming seems to activate the full dimension, not just the end that’s primed
    *Events can make information more accessible
    *Differ in what categories are readily accessible for them
    *The most accessible categories are the ones the people use the most
    *Chronic accessibility reflects people’s readiness to use particular schemas in seeing the world -> provide information about how that person sees the world
    *Influence people’s actions
    -Goals activated -> makes attitudes more positive toward stimuli that could facilitate achieving the goal
    -Increases tendencies toward different but related behaviors- as young as 18 months
    *Primes of particular type of procedural knowledge -> use of that same knowledge in the future
23
Q

Subliminal primes (John Bargh)

A
  • primes outside their awareness
  • Often have the same effects as overt primes
  • Goal linked to particular relationships -> priming the relationship outside awareness activates the related goal pursuing unconsciously
  • Subliminally priming an emotion -> judgments of subsequent stimuli to take on that emotional quality
24
Q

Connectionism

A
  • uses neuronal processes as a metaphor for cognitive processes
  • Nervous system processes information simultaneously along many pathways -> parallel processing
  • Holds that representations aren’t centralized in specific nodes
  • A representation exists in a pattern of activation of an entire network of neurons
  • Describe cognition in terms of networks of simple neuron-like units, in which processing means passing activations from one unit to another
  • Each unit can be either excitatory or inhibitatory -> either adds to or subtracts from the total activity of the unit for which it serves as input
  • Each unit sums its inputs (pluses and minuses) and passes the total onward
  • Energy passes in only one direction for each connection, as in neurons
  • But links are often assumed in which activation goes from a “later” unit back to an “earlier” one -> true for neurons
  • Network reacts to an input with a pattern of activity
  • Input -> connections -> output (response to input)
  • The pattern of activations in the network is updated repeatedly- potentially, quite often.
  • Gradually, the system “settles” into a configuration, and further updates yield no more change.
25
Q

Social perception and decision making in connectionism

A
  • Selecting one possibility from among two or more
  • Experience is being constructed from bits of input
  • Activations get transferred from unit to unit, around and around
  • As the activation pattern is updated over and over, some constraints get stronger and some get weaker.
  • The network, as a whole, settles into a pattern -> perception or the decision
  • Decisions re made from fitting bits of evidence together despite their constraints on one another.
  • Once a decision has been reached -> influence back on your evaluation of the evidence, making it more coherent with the decision
  • Very hard to tell ahead of time how they will settle out
  • These networks can be very stable, they sometimes reorganize abruptly
  • Effects of that small change are amplified instead of dampened -> profound reverberation over cycles -> drastic reorganization
26
Q

Dual-process models (Smolensky)

A
  • Conscious processor is used for effortful reasoning and following of programs of instructions
  • intuitive processor manages intuitive problem solving, heuristic strategies, and skilled or automatic activities using connectionist processes
27
Q

Seymour Epstein’s cognitive-experiential self-theory

A
  • assumes that we experience reality through two systems
  • The rational system operates mostly consciously, uses logical rules, and is fairly slow - symblic processor in rational mind
  • The experiential system is tuitive; “quick and dirty” way of assessing and responding to reality; relies on shortcuts and readily available information; functions automatically and largely outside consciousness
  • Both systems are always at work and that they jointly determine behavior
  • Each can also be engaged to a greater degree by circumstances
  • The more emotionally charged a situation is, the more thinking is dominated by the experimential system
  • The experiential system resulted from eons of evolution.
  • Dominates when speed is needed as when the situation is emotionally charged
  • Act fast; can’t even wait to form an intention (avoid danger)
  • The rational system- recent in origin
  • Provides a more cautious, analytic, planful way of proceeding
  • When you have enough time and freedom from pressure to think things through
28
Q

Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion

A
  • Two different routes to persuasion in making decisions
  • Central route occurs when a person is thinking carefully about a situation, elaborating on the information they are given, and creating an argument. This route occurs when an individual’s motivation and ability are high.
  • The peripheral route occurs when a person is not thinking carefully about a situation and uses shortcuts to make judgments. This route occurs when an individual’s motivation and ability are low.
29
Q

Explicit knowledge

A
  • accessible on demand
  • comes from verbal, conceptual learning
  • rational, deliberative system
30
Q

Implicit knowledge

A
  • which isn’t accessible on demand; existence of automatic mental associations we aren’t really aware of
  • Concerns prejudices and how they’re mentally represented
  • comes from simple association learning- classical and instrumental conditioning
  • starts forming earlier in life than explicit knowledge
  • experiential or reflexive or intuitive system
31
Q

Implicit self-esteem

A
  • Relate to negative feeling states in day-to-day life, independent of any role of explicit self-esteem
  • Isn’t very highly correlated with explicit self-esteem
  • Both implicit and explicit attitudes -> behaviors (different aspects of behavior)
32
Q

Cognitive-social learning person variables (Mischel)

A
  • Person’s competencies: the skills that one develops over life
  • Skills for manipulating the physical world
  • Develop social skills and problem-solving strategies, tools for analyzing the social world
  • Different people have different patterns of competencies
  • Situations also vary in what competencies they call for
  • Different situations provide opportunities for different persons to take advantage of.
  • Encoding strategies and personal constructs
  • Covers schemas
  • Unique worldview each person develops
  • People construe events and people differently, depending on the schema they’re using
  • Two people react to the same situation differently because they literally experience it differently.
  • But to know what people will do in that world, you also need to know their expectancies
  • An anticipation that one kind of event typically leads to another event
  • Expectancies about what’s connected to what provide continuity in experience
  • Behavior-outcome expectancy: the belief that particular acts typically lead to particular outcomes
  • Expectancies begin to specify what people do: people do what they think will produce outcomes
  • Knowing what outcomes the person wants to produce: the person’s subjective values
  • Cause people to use their expectancies in action
  • Self-regulatory systems and plans
  • Set goals, make plans, and do the various things that need to be done to see that the plans are realized in action
33
Q

Cognitive-affective processing system (Mischel and Shoda) (1995)

A
  • reflects the recognition that emotion plays a key role in much of cognitive experience
  • People develop organizations of information about the nature of situations, other people and the self.
  • These schema are more complex
  • Have a kind of if…then property- a conditional quality
  • People normally think in conditional terms about each other
  • People also think conditionally about themselves
  • Norms- appropritate actions in those situations
34
Q

Individuality arises from two sources

A
  • People differ in the accessibility of their various schemas and the cues that evoke the schemas
  • Different schemas are likely to pop up for different people in a given setting
  • People literally perceive different things in the same situation.
  • People differ in their if…then profiles
  • When a schema is active, the person will act in ways that fits it.
  • Different actions for different people
35
Q

To predict consistency of action -> you need to know two things

A
  • You need to know how the person construes the situation (which depends on the person’s schemas and their accessibility)
  • You need to know the person’s if …then profile
36
Q

Behavioral signature

A
  • the unique profile of if…then relations for a person’s personality
  • May define personality
  • Relatively stable over time
  • Account for temporal consistency in behavior- element in conceptions of personality
37
Q

Mirror neurons

A
  • certain neurons that are active when a monkey does an action are also active when the monkey sees the same action
  • Perceptual memories may actually be organized in terms of potentials for action
38
Q

Cognitive assessment

A
  • range from interviews and self-reports to think-aloud protocols, in which a person says what comes to mind while doing an acitivity.
  • A variation on this is experience sampling, which is more intermittent.
39
Q

Think-aloud approaches

A

*assess cognition during problem solving

40
Q

Experience sampling

A
  • People report at certain times what they’ve been thinking and doing
  • Some are made at scheduled times
  • Sometimes are randomly paged and asked to report
  • Allows researchers to sample across a wide range of events in a person’s day
  • Find out what cognitions and emotions go along with which kinds of events
41
Q

Event recording or self-monitoring

A
  • Focuses not on particular moments of the day but on particular classes of events
  • The person records instances of specific event types, noting the behavior, emotion, or thought pattern and documenting information about what was going on at that moment.
  • Lets the person see regularities in the contexts that surround particular thoughts and emotions
  • Provides a better understanding of what schemas he or she is automatically using
42
Q

Automatic thoughts

A
  • Inaccurate schemas are used quickly and spontaneously
  • Influence feelings and behaviors
  • Run-on quality: negative feelings -> more use of negative schemas -> more negative affect and so on
  • Expecting emotional distress makes distress more likely
  • People who are prone to depression or anxiety seem to over-rely on information in memory and under-rely on the reality of the situation
43
Q

Cognitive triad (Beck)

A

*negative thinking about the self, the world, and the future

44
Q

Cognitive restructuring/reframing

A
  • Therapy should help people to put faulty schemas aside and build new ones
  • People must learn to recognize automatic self-defeating thoughts and substitute other self-talk
  • People must also learn to focus on the information in the situation and rely less on their preconceptions
  • These people should become more controlled in processing what’s going on and less automatic
45
Q

Cognitive therapies

A
  • Changing faulty schemas and their consequences
  • Getting people to go ahead and do things they expect (unrealistically) to have bad consequences
  • If the bad outcome doesn’t happen -> re-examine/change expectations
  • People are encouraged to view their thought patterns as hypotheses to be tested, instead of as certainties
  • Encouraged to go ahead and test the hypotheses
  • Large impact on how people view themselves