Chapter 10: Thinking, Problem Solving, & Reasoning Flashcards

1
Q

Thinking

A

Going beyond the info give, a complex/high level skill that fills gaps in evidence
Refers to more than one specific activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Focused Thinking

A

Clear starting point and has a specific goal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Unfocused Thinking

A

Character of daydreaming, or unintentionally calling to mind a number of loosely related ideas
Not sure if creative thinking falls under focused or unfocused thinking (mixed research, might be a combination)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Reasoning

A

Cognitive processes we use when we draw inferences from info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Introspection

A

Detailed, concurrent, non judgemental observation of contents of consciousness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Well-Defined Problems

A

Clear goal, present a small set of info to start from, often present set of rules to abide by while working to solution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Ill-Defined Problems

A

Don’t have goals, starting info, or steps clearly spelled out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Generate & Test Technique

A

Generating numerous possible solutions and testing them
Useful when there aren’t a lot of possibilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Classic Problems/Methods of Solution

A

Generate and test
Means-ends analysis
Working backward
Reasoning by analogy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Problems With Generate & Test Technique

A

Doesn’t work well when;
Too many possibilities
No guidance over generation
Can’t keep track of possibilities tested

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Means-Ends Analysis Steps

A

Initial state: conditions at beginning of problem
Goals state: condition at the end of problem
Intermediate states: various conditions that exist along pathways between the initial and goal state
Operators: permissible moves that can be made towards the problem’s solution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Means-Ends Analysis Downfalls

A

However, sometimes the optimal way to reach solution is to take a temporary step backward from the goal
Can make it more difficult to see that most efficient path to a goal isn’t always the most direct one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Means-Ends Analysis

A

Reduce the difference between initial state and goal state
Involves generating a goal and sub goals
Any sequence of moves beginning at initial state and ending at final goal constitutes a solution path

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Working Backward

A

Analyze goal to determine the last step needed to achieve it, then next to last step, etc
Involves creating sub goals and reducing differences between the current state and the goal state
Sub goals are created working backwards from the goal state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Backtracking

A

Problem solving involves making working assumptions
To correct mistakes in problem solving, we need to;
Remember assumptions
Assess which assumptions failed
Correct the assumption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Reasoning By Analogy

A

Find comparisons between two situations and apply the solution from one situation to another
Involves a deep understanding of elements of problem and their relationships
Map a solution from one problem to a different problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Risk of Reasoning by Analogy

A

Can be taken too far if one assumes that the links map on too directly between the two domains

18
Q

Blocks To Problem Solving

A

Mental sets
Lack of problem specific knowledge/expertise
Finding creative solutions
Unconscious processing/incubation
Everyday mechanisms

19
Q

Mental Set

A

Tendency to adopt a certain framework, strategy, or procedure based on your initial assumption instead of other equally plausible ways
Induced by short amounts of practice
Often cause people to make unwarranted assumptions without awareness

20
Q

Perceptual Set

A

Tendency to perceive an object or pattern in a certain way on the basis of your immediate perceptual experience

21
Q

Functional Fixedness

A

Adopting a rigid mental set toward an object
E.g. using screwdriver as a weighted pendulum on a string to reach two far apart strings at once

22
Q

Expertise

A

Expertise alone is not always enough for problem solving
Brain damage can disrupt the role of expertise

23
Q

Chess Players & Expertise

A

Examined chess masters and novices
Both considered the same number of possible moves
But masters somehow chose the best move more easily

Experts can recall more items from a 5 second exposure of a chessboard
But only when the pieces are configured to depict a possible chess game

24
Q

Why Are Experts Better

A

More domain specific categorization skills (draw form more exemplars)
Represent problems at a deeper more conceptual level
Better chunking

25
Q

Insight

A

Change in frame of reference or in way elements of problem are interpreted/organized

26
Q

Creativity

A

Appropriate novelty
Originality that suits a purpose

27
Q

Unconscious Processing/Incubation

A

While mind is actively running other cognitive process, some other sort of processing was happening in background
Unconscious processes can help us find answers to problems

28
Q

Rebus Puzzles

A

Participants solve 15 word puzzles, 16th has a misleading cue inducing a fixation on incorrect interpretation
Participants given filled interval breaks (e.g. playing music during break between tasks) were more likely to forget misleading cue and solve the rebus later

29
Q

Creative Processes

A

Directed remembering
Noticing
Contrary recognition

30
Q

Directed Remembering

A

Ability to channel your memory to make conscious some past experience or knowledge that meets various constraints

31
Q

Noticing

A

Noticing where problems are
Plays a role in noticing similarities between one problem and another

32
Q

Contrary Recognition

A

Ability to recognize objects not for what they are but as something else
E.g. see a cloud as a castle

33
Q

Reasoning

A

Typically have one or more particular goals in mind
Focused thinking
Involves inferences or conclusions drawn from other info

34
Q

Deductive Reasoning

A

From general to specific/particular
No new information added
Drawn conclusions represent info that was already implicit in the premises
E.g. all uni students like pizza, terry is uni student, therefore he likes pizza

35
Q

Inductive Reasoning

A

From specific to general
Can result in conclusions that contain new info
Deals with probable truth, not guaranteed truth
E.g. Brian is a uni student, he lives in a dorm, therefore all uni students live in dorms

36
Q

Deductive Validity

A

Arguments are deductively valid if and only if it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to be false
Provides reasoner with guarantee that if start with true premises and reason according to logic, conclusion must be true
Only holds for deductive reasoning

37
Q

Inductive Strength

A

Arguments have inductive strength if it is improbable (not impossible) for the premises to be true and the conclusion false
If has begun with true premises and followed acceptable principles

38
Q

Type 1 Process

A

Intuitive
Autonomous, intuitive, do not require working memory

39
Q

Type 2 Process

A

Analytic
Deliberative, analytic, require working memory, different thinking styles
Biases observed in reasoning tasks thought to be due to failure to engage analytic thinking

40
Q

Willingness To Engage in Type 2 Process

A

When reasoning depends on efficiency of metacognitive monitoring of type 1 outputs
Confidence in type 1 response determines chance of engaging in type 2 processes (lower confidence = more type 2)
Explicit instructions to use logic increases type 2 thinking

41
Q

Thinking/Problem Solving & Prefrontal Damage

A

Catastrophically hampered in ability to reason with problems requiring integration of multiple propositions when premises were not in order permitting easy integration
Did not show deficits in IQs or semantic memory