Chapter 10-11: Aggression & Prejudice Flashcards

1
Q

Two types of aggression

A

Hostile aggression
Stems from anger and is aimed at inflicting pain

Instrumental aggression
Means to some goal other then causing pain
Ie aggression to get ahead

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Cultural differences:

Culture of honor

A

Southern males supposedly have a heightened sense of masculinity, and react aggressively when it is threatened.

Cohen 1996

Males from south who were bumped into and threatened had heightened levels of cortisol and testosterone. They also walked further into a threatening game of chicken.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Gender differences in aggression:

A

Men are more physically aggressive

Women are more relationally aggressive
-gossip, backstabbing rumors etc

Bettencourt 1996:
Men are more aggressive but: The gender difference dissolves when either gender is threatened.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Rewards for aggression

A

Positive reinforcement
It gets you things you want

Negative reinforcement
Stops bad things from happening
Using aggression to discourage something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reducing aggression by punishment

A

Reducing by Punishments
Can be effective under certain circumstances

Must:

  • Immediately follow behavior
  • be strong enough to deter aggressor
  • Consistently applied and seen as fair/legitimate

However

  • May provoke retaliation
  • provides model to imitate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Social learning theory and experiment

A

Social learning theory
People learn social behavior by observing others and imitating them

Children imitate aggression in degree and kind (bandura, 1961)

  • Experimenters beat up a bobo doll
  • Kids would match that behavior in degree and kind, and not in control
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Media exposure

Effects and study

A
Violent TV (short and long term)
Correlational study shows positive correlation in the short term violence and the long term violence

Violent video games and music
(Anderson & dill, 2000)
People played violent or nonviolent video game/music
Then they delivered noise blasts to others
Participants who played violent games sent much longer times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How does media exposure increase aggressions?

Five ways

A

Weakened inhibitions via social influence
-When you see other people engaging in aggressive behaviors it tells
you it’s ok, others do it, so your inhibitions are chipped away

Imitation, ie social learning theory
-You see others doing it so you imitate

Priming anger appraisals
-When you encounter or engage in aggression it primes aggression to
make it more accessible

Habituation to violence
-We see it all the time and so we get used to it.

Increasing defensiveness
-You perceive the world as a dangerous violent place, and are violent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Frustration aggression hypothesis

A

Frustration aggression hypothesis

Frustration occurs when you’re being blocked from being able to attain a goal, it increases likelihood of a aggression

Interrupting progress toward goal leads to frustration leads to aggressiveness

Claims all aggression is caused by frustration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Catharsis and experiment

A

Catharsis: letting out anger makes you feel better

This is wrong, evidence against

Green 1975
Participants were shocked by a confederate. They were either aggressively shocked or lightly shocked, supposedly the aggression would create a need for catharsis. In the second part, the confederate was shocked by no one, an experimenter, or the participant. If catharsis, the participant should shock less if they’ve already had chance to shock. However, those who got to shock already shocked more instead of less, knocking down catharsis, pushing that violence perpetuates violence

Engaging in aggression increases future aggression likelihood. Creates aggression reward chain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Negative affect

A

When you don’t feel good you’re more aggressive

Eg:
People are more aggressive in heat
-murders rapes up
-baseball batters hit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Provocation and humor

A

Baron & ball
Yes it leads to aggression but humor can neutralize the situation

Participant was attacked like first study
Then they were supposed to rate cartoons or neutral pics
Dependent was average shocks
Provocation lead to higher shocks only with neutral participants, funny ones had no difference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Associated cues

A

Associated cues
Just the presence of guns or accessibility of them increases aggression

Berkowitz and lepage 1968
Subjects were angered or not
There were either actual guns on the table or badminton rackets or nothing
Dependent was how much participant shocks
Increase on aggression with guns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Prejudice- ________ component

A

Prejudice- affective component

Hostile or negative attitude based solely on group membership
Persists despite evidence to the contrary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Implicit v explicit attitudes

A

Implicit attitudes

  • Automatic,
  • uncontrollable,
  • involuntary,
  • unconscious

Explicit attitudes
Consciously endorse or verbally agree to
In American culture the structure of prejudice has shifted to a decrease of explicit prejudice values yet implicit attitudes still lie there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Stereotype: ________ component

A

Stereotype: cognitive component

Geteneraoizealtion of a group of people where certain traits are assigned to all members

Ignoring individuability of members

Seeing people less of person more as group member

17
Q

Cognitive ______

Confirmation bias

A

Cognitive misers”
people tend to spend as little effort as they can resulting in stereotypes

Confirmation bias-
when we see someone act in these stereotypes if confirms it but we ignore when they act against

18
Q

Discrimination: _______ component

Micro aggression

A

Discrimination- behavioral component
Negative harmful action toward member of a group solely because group membership

Microaggressions- not intended to be hostile small ways we act different
Talking down to women
Telling Asian his English is good

19
Q

Three parts and components:

A

Prejudice
-Affective, how we feel

Stereotypes
-Cognitive, how we think

Discrimination
-Behavioral, how we act

20
Q

Scapegoating and displacement

A

When frustrated taking it out on safe targets and displace aggression on them

21
Q

Reaction formation

A

Reaction formation
Reduces unacceptable feelings you’re uncomfortable with so you’re uncomfortable with

Eg:
Homophobia is associated with homosexual arousal
The most homophobic were the most attracted to gay porn

22
Q

Economic theory of discrimination

A

Economics
Group conflict stems from competition over limited resource

Eg:
Robbers cave experiment
Inter group conflict arose immediately when competition was introduced
Super-ordinate goals (goals above each group) reduced inter group conflict

23
Q

Motivational hypothesis of discrimination

Minimal groups paradigm

A

Motivational
Inter group hostility can develop in the absence of competition

Minimal groups paradigm
Hostility arises even in dumb meaningless groups with no competition, shown in underestimator overestimator experiment

24
Q

Social identity theory and study

A

Social identity theory
Self concept and self esteem derive from status and accomplish from groups
Boost status of in groups, boosts own self esteem (BURGing)

Can derogating out group members boost ones self esteem?
(Fein, 1997) eg are people motivated to discriminate out group to boost ones self esteem

People took an exam, those who had self esteem hurt by gold they did badly released racism against Jews when rating profiles, actively making themselves feel better

25
Q

Aggression

A

Aggression is behavior intended to cause physical harm or psychological pain to another personal

Emphasis on intent

26
Q

Stereotyping:

Conserving mental resources via categorization:

A

Conserving mental resources via categorization

Categorizing people helps conserve mental resources
(Think back to schemas and social categorization helps process info)

More likely to use stereotypes when we are ego depleted
Eg: during nonoptimal times of day
-(morning people stereotype at night and vice versa

Can stereotypes conserve resources?
Macrame et al 1994
People remembered information better when they viewed t through the schema of a stereotype, this allowed them more mental resources
-stereotype of Indonesian people in this study

27
Q

Effects of biased assessment: two examples

A

Effects of biased assessments
Even if we assume stereotypes conserve resources they don’t make it more accurate

Out group homogeneity
Paired distinctiveness

28
Q

Out group homogeneity

A

People tend to view in group members as unique and individuals and out group members as similar and ununique

You overestimate how similar out group members are

You may want to think of in group as multifaceted and out group as boring

29
Q

Paired distinctiveness and study

A

Pairing of two distinctive effects stands out even more because they cooccur (eg illusionary corollary)
-People in minority groups are distinctive because they’re rare, crime is
also distinctive plus negativity bias
-which says we remember negative things more

Eg: We’re more likely to remember minority’s who commit crimes
because of paired distinctiveness

Hamilton (1976)
Saw slides of people in either group a or b doing good or bad things
-Group A: Majority
-Group B: Minority (1/3)
More positive actions than negative for both

Results
People were much more likely to say that negative actions were committed by group b

Caused by fact that
-minorities are distinctive and
-negative things are more distinctive
therefore they are more likely to be paired together

30
Q

Modern racism/expression of racism

A

Modern racism

Outwardly acting nonprejudiced while inwardly maintaining racist views
Social norms regarding appropriate inter group behavior have changed
Same holds for sexism homophobia etc

31
Q

Implicit measures of attitudes

Two ways

A

Implicit measures of attitudes
Instead of directly asking attitudes that measure explicit attitudes

Implicit association test (IAT)
The association test with black good etc
Shows your internal biases

Affect Misattribution procedure (AMP)
Operates off of Misattribution effect:
-People aren’t good at identifying where their emotions come from
Quick presentation of a picture. Then you rate pleasantness of pictograph, the early flasher influences their rating
-They’re misattributing the affect of the photo onto the earlier photo

32
Q

Benevolent racism v Hostile racism

A

“Good stereotypes” are still damaging to a group!

Still distinguish one rom another

Chivalry, athleticism, etc

Point to hostile racism below

33
Q

Attributional ambiguity

A

Attributional ambiguity

Difficult to determine whether outcomes are result of prejudice or not
Applies to Good or bad events

34
Q

Stereotype threat

A

Stereotype threat- like self fulfilling prophesy

Being anxious or fearful that you’ll fit into the stigma or stereotype, often making you do it
Leads to increased arousal which can interfere with performance on complex tasks
Can also lead to negative thinking or just fixating more on avoiding failure than attaining success

Pittinsky 1999
Can we shift salience of identity to change performance?
Shifting Asian women’s focus on gender or race can make them perform better or worse at math exams

35
Q

Contact hypothesis: six things

A

Contact between groups is the best way to reduce conflict. However six factors best facilitate this:

Prejudice can be reduced by:

  1. Mutual independence
  2. Shared Common goals
  3. Equal status
  4. Supportive environment
  5. Multiple group members
  6. Supportive social norms