Chap 12 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define nonequivalent control group design

A

A quasi-experimental study that has at least one treatment group and comparison group, but participants have not been randomly assigned to the two groups

(Groups are not perfectly equivalent)

(Ex: head start program children vs non head start children)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Repeated measures: quasi-experiments

A

Participants experience both levels of an independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define interrupted time-series design

A

A quasi experimental study that measures people repeatedly on a dependent variable before, during and after the “interruption” caused by some event

(Ex: vacation and job burn outs, tested before during and after vacation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define quasi-experiments

A

Similar to true experiments except experimenters don’t have full experimental control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define nonequivalent groups interrupted time-series design

A

It combines two of the previous studies (nonequivalent control group and interrupted time-series)

One treatment group and comparison group (without treatment) and tested multiple times throughout study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What’s the main problem with quasi-experiments?

A

Internal validity: the researchers ability to draw causal conclusions from the results

We’re there alternate explanations for your findings?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Selection effects are relevant for which group design

A

Independent group designs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When does a selection threat to internal validity apply

A

When the groups at the various levels of an independent variable contain different types of participants

This makes it unclear whether it was the independent variable or the different type of participants in each group that led to a difference in the dependent variable between the groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define maturation threats

A

When and experiment or quasi-experimental design has a pretest and post test and a treatment group that shows an improvement over time but it is not clear whether the improvement was caused by the treatment or whether the group would’ve improved spontaneously or even without the treatment

(Comparison groups help rule these out)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define history threat

A

Occurs when external historical events happen for everyone in a study at the same time as the treatment variable or by the common external event.

(Comparison groups help rule these out)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define selection history threat

A

History threat that applies to only one group not the other

Historical event systematically affects the subjects only in the treatment groups or in the comparison group not both

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define regression to the mean

A

Occurs when an extreme score is caused by a combination of random factors that are unlikely to happen in the same combination again so the extreme score gets less extreme overtime

(Ex: Phillies lucky 22-1 win over the Reds, did not repeat itself in the next game)

Could be just luck, and luck changes over time

Regression effects are a threat to validity primarily when a group is selected because of its extremely high or low scores.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define attrition (mortality) threat

A

Applies when people drop out of a study for some systematic reason.

Occurs mainly in designs with protest and post test

(To check for you should only count people who complete all parts of study)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define testing threats

A

Can occur whenever researchers measure participants more than once.

A testing threat is a kind of order fact in which participants tend to change as a result of having been test before

Repeated testing my cause people to improve regardless of the treatment they received

It can also cause people to decline because of fatigue or boredom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define instrumentation threats

A

Can be an internal validity threat when participants are tested or observed twice

A measuring instrument to change over repeated uses and this change to threaten internal validity

(Ex: study uses two versions of a test with different standards)

Comparison group can help rule this out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define observer bias

A

When the experimenters expectations influence their interpretation of the results

To check: Was the study double blind?

17
Q

Define experimental demand

A

And participants guess with the study is about and change their behavior in the expected direction

To check: you can think about whether the participants were able to detect the study’s goals and respond accordingly

18
Q

Define placebo effect

A

When the participants improve but only because they believe they’re receiving an effective treatment

To check: comparison group that received inert, placebo, or treatment

19
Q

Why do we do quasi-experiments

A

Opportunity: take advantage of real-world opportunities

External validity: enhances external validity. We don’t have to question real world setting because it did (not manipulated)

Ethics: not withholding treatment or benefits it happens on it’s own

Construct validity: how well study is manipulated or measured

Statistical validity: how large the groups differences were (the effect size) and whether the results were statistically significant

20
Q

How are quasi-experiments and correlation all studies different and the same

A

Same: not randomly assigned, 2 measured variables

Different: in quasi-experiments researchers tend to do more meddling

21
Q

Define small-N design

A

Obtain a lot of info from a few cases

Each participant is treated as a separate experiment.

Almost always repeated measures design in which researchers observe how the person or animal response to several systematic design conditions.

Individuals data are presented

Researchers decide whether result is replicated by repeating our experiment on a new participant

22
Q

Define large-N designs

A

Participants are grouped. The data from an individual participant are not of interest to themselves; data from all participants in each group are combined and studied together.

Dara are represented as group averages

Researchers decide whether a result is replicated by doing a test of statistical significance

23
Q

Define single-N design

A

Restricting the study to only one animal or person

24
Q

Define experimental control

A

What the experimenter controls

25
Q

Manipulation

A

The task given

Ex: strong manipulation task would be easy for someone and difficult for someone else

26
Q

Define replication

A

Repeating the study

27
Q

Define study special cases

A

Takes advantage of a unique population

Just as a quasi-experiment it can take advantage of natural accidents laws and historical events

28
Q

Are the disadvantages of small-N studies

A

Few participants might not represent the human population very well

May not be ethical to test on more people in some cases

29
Q

What are the three small-N designs

A

Stable-baseline design: researchers spent in several weeks recording baseline information, then taught new strategy/given treatment

The stable baseline meant that there was not a single extremely low point for much improvement would almost definitely occur

30
Q

Define multiple-baseline design

A

First recorded a baseline of multiple behaviors

Overcorrection was applied to one behavior and then later extended to other behaviors

31
Q

Define reversal designs

A

Researchers observe a problem behavior both with and without treatment

Reversal designed the practitioner takes the treatment away for a while the (reversal phase) to see whether the problem behavior returns

If the treatment was really working then the behavior should worsen again when the treatment is discontinued