Ch9 - Ownership and Corporate Control Flashcards

1
Q

Types of investors

A
  • Individuals: company founders, families, executives, directors, other private investors
  • Institutions: pension funds, mutual funds, exchange traded funds (ETF), banks, insurances, sovereign & hedge funds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Pro & Con of ETFs

A

Exchange Traded Funds

+One single investment necessary for private investor to hold a diversified portfolio
+ Low management fees
- Beneficial Ownership: Investors in ETFs don’t directly own shares, limiting their voting rights.
- Passive Management: Focus on tracking indices reduces incentives for shareholder activism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Def. of Shareholder Activism

A

Defined as actions taken by shareholders to influence corporate policies and practices.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Channels fo Shareholder Activism

A

○ Direct negotiation with management/board
○ Proxy contests
○ Public campaigns
○ Shareholder proposals
○ Litigation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reasons for historically low overall levels of shareholder activism

A

○ High costs and free-rider problems for small shareholders
○ Passive investment approach favored by many institutional investors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The “Heuschrecken (Locust) Debate”

A

● German term criticising activist investors (particularly hedge funds) for perceived short-termism and potential job losses.
● Sparked by Grohe acquisition, despite eventual positive outcomes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Costs of Activism

A

○ Engaging without management involvement: 0.5 basis points per year (assets)
○ Active management involvement: 50-100 basis points per year

1 basis point = 0.01%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Obstacles for pension and mutual funds (shareholder activism)

A

○ Diversification requirements
○ Weak personal incentives for fund managers
○ Insider trading regulations restricting board nominations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Hedge Funds in Activism

A
  • hedge fund activism can lead to positive returns for target companies in the short term
  • long-term effects of their activism and their potential impact on stakeholders beyond shareholders remain subjects of debate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are Hedge Funds

A

○ Pooled, private, not widely available
○ Operate outside typical US securities regulations
○ Performance-based compensation, significant manager investment

○ Advantages over traditional funds:
○ Not required to diversify portfolios
○ Allowed to use leverage, lock-up periods, and charge higher performance fees
○ Can engage in derivatives trading, enhancing flexibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evolution of Activism

A

○ Institutional investors becoming key activists:
○ Driven by regulation, long-term focus, and ESG concerns
● Globalization of activism:
○ Expansion of investor service companies (ISS, Glass Lewis)
● Emergence of ESG:
○ Investors push for climate action, diversity, and social responsibility
○ Prominent stances by BlackRock, Vanguard, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What voting rights are there as shareholder?

A

○ Board elections
○ Capital changes
○ Bylaw amendments
○ Say-on-pay votes
○ Tender offers
○ Auditor appointments
○ CEO and board discharge

(might depend on the charta)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Cash-flow rights vs. voting rights

A

may not be proportional due to:
○ Departures from one-share one-vote
○ Complex ownership structures
○ Investor heterogeneity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ownership Structures to limit other voting rights

A

● Pyramids: Control via a chain of ownership stakes.
● Dual-class shares: Different classes with varying voting and cash-flow rights.
● Cross-shareholdings: Companies holding stakes in each other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Weakest Link Approach (simple pyramid)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Weakest Link Approach (multi channel)

A
17
Q

Voting-Power Indices

A
18
Q

Pro and Cons of Weakest-Link Approach

A

– Arbitrary threshold (α): Depending on the chosen threshold, the results can differ significantly.
– Other control-related information, such as the remaining shareholder structure, is not taken into account.

19
Q

Dispersed Ownership

A

○ Common in Anglo-Saxon countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia)
○ Broad base of individual and institutional investors
○ Market for corporate control as a disciplinary mechanism

20
Q

Concentrated Ownership

A

○ Prevalent in Continental Europe (Germany, Italy, France)
○ Family ownership and cross-shareholdings common
○ Large shareholders incentivized to monitor management
○ Risk of expropriation of minority interests

21
Q

State Ownership

A

○ Common globally, especially in strategic sectors (utilities, energy, finance)
○ Examples: China, Middle East, Russia, France, Norway
○ Debate on the effectiveness and economic costs of state ownership