Ch3 - Empirical Methods in Corporate Governance Research Flashcards

1
Q

Endogeneity

A
  • Arises when explanatory variables are correlated with the error term in a regression model
  • This correlation leads to biased and inconsistent parameter estimates
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sources of Endogeneity

A
  • Omitted Variables
  • Reverse Causation
  • Measurement Errors
  • Signaling Effects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Reverse Causation

A
  • direction of causality between variables is unclear.
  • change in one variable causes a change in another or if the relationship is bidirectional (-> Egg Chicken)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Measurement Errors

A
  • Discrepancies between the true values of variables and their measured ones
  • Especially for proxy variables
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Signaling Effects

A

These occur when actions taken by firms or individuals convey information to stakeholders (bad signal when firing CG officer)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Addressing Endogeneity

A
  • Advanced Econometric Techniques (two-stage least squares (2SLS))
  • Smart Empirical Design (randomized trials)
  • Natural Experiments (exogenous shocks)
  • Improved Data and Proxy Variables (better data sources)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Randomized trials (RTs)

A
  • gold standard
  • treatment and control
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Randomized Experiments vs Endogeneity

A

– reverse causation and simultaneity (only the input variable is changed),
– omitted variables (all controls are orthogonal to the shock),
– measurement errors in the covariates (all controls are independent of the
shock),
– signaling effects (the shock is exogenous).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Natural Experiments

A

exploit exogenous shocks as treatments to assess causal relationships (e.g. regulatory changes) for comparing outcomes before and after the shock

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Difference-in-differences (DID) designs

A

compares changes in the variable of interest between treatment and control groups over time (natural experiments)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why are Natural Experiments and DID difficult for CG-Research?

A

It’s not possible to have to variants of markets running at the same time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Regression discontinuity designs (RDD)

A

Leverage a threshold that determines treatment assignment. Entities above the threshold receive treatment, while those below do not.
-> RDD regressions utilize a dummy variable indicating treatment status and interactions between the forcing variable and the treatment dummy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Sharp RDD

A

Treatment assignment is deterministic based on the forcing variable. Knowing the forcing variable’s value definitively determines treatment status

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Fuzzy RDD

A

The probability of treatment assignment changes discontinuously at the threshold. While the forcing variable influences treatment assignment, there is not a perfect one-to-one relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly